Time and time again

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 143-158

  Hollnagel, Erik ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Context; Control; Dynamics; Time; User model

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008852588     PISSN: 1463922X     EISSN: 1464536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14639220210124111     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ashby, W. R. 1956, An Introduction to Cybernetics (London: Methuen & Co).
2. Bergan, M. and Alty, J. L. 1992, Multimedia interface design in process control, IEE Colloquium on Interactive Multimedia: a Review and Update for Potential Users, 9/1-9/6.
3. Blom, H. A. P., Stroeve, S., Daams, J. and Nijhuis, H. B. 2001, Human cognition performance model based evaluation of air traffic safety, in S. W. A. Dekker (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Human Error, Safety and Systems Development, Linkoping, Sweden, 11-12 June 2001.
4. Broadbent, D. E. 1980, The minimization of models, in A. J. Chapman and D. M. Jones (eds), Models of Man (Leicester: The British Psychological Society), 113-128.
5. Bye, A., Hollnagel, E. and Brendeford, T. S. 1999, Human-machine function allocation: a functional modelling approach, Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 64, 291-300.
6. Colburn, T. R. 1991, Program verification, defeasible reasoning, and two views of computer science, Minds and Machines, 1, 97-116.
7. Conant, R. C. and Ashby, W. R. 1970, Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system, International Journal of Systems Science, 1, 89-97.
8. Corker, K. and Verma, S. 2000, Introduction of context in human performance model as applied to dynamic resectorization, Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, Ohio, 5-7 March 2000 (Ohio State University Press).
9. Craik, K. 1943, The Nature of Explanation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
10. Decortis, F. and De Keyser, V. 1988, Time: the Cinderella of man-machine interaction, IFAC/IFIP/IEA/IFORS Conference on Man-Machine Systems, 14-16 June 1988, Oulu, Finland.
11. Dekker, S. W. A. and Woods, D. D. 1999, To intervene or not to intervene: the dilemma of management by exception, Cognition, Technology & Work, 1, 86-96.
12. Donders, F. C. 1969, On the speed of mental processes, Acta Psychologica, 30, 412-431. (Translated from Over de snelheid van psychische processen. Onderzoekingen gedaan in het Physiologisch Laboratorium der Utrechtsche Hoogeschool, 1868-1869, Tweede reeks, II, 92-120.)
13. FITTER, M. J. and Sime, M. E. 1980, Responsibility and shared decision-making, in H. T. Smith and T. R. G. Green (eds), Human Interaction with Computers (London: Academic Press), 59-67.
14. Furukawa, H. and Inagaki, T. 1999, Situation-adaptive interface based on abstraction hierarchies with an updating mechanism for maintaining situation awareness of plant operators, IEEE SMC ‘99 Conference Proceedings Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 3, 693-698.
15. Hollnagel, E. 1993a, Models Of cognition: procedural prototypes and contextual control, Le Travail Humain, 56, 27-51.
16. Hollnagel, E. 1993b, Human Reliability Analysis: Context and Control (London: Academic Press).
17. Hollnagel, E. 1998, Context, cognition, and control, in Y. Waern (ed.), Co-operation in Process Management—Cognition and Information Technology (London: Taylor & Francis), 27-52.
18. Hollnagel, E. and Woods, D. D. 1983, Cognitive systems engineering: new wine in new bottles, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18, 583-600.
19. Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1980, Mental models in cognitive science, Cognitive Science, 4, 71-115.
20. McRuer, D. T., Allen, W., Weir, D. H. and Klein, R. H. 1977, New results in driver steering control, Human Factors, 19, 381-397.
21. MORAY, N. 1981, Human Information Processing and Supervisory Control (Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Industrial Liaison Program).
22. Neisser, U. 1976, Cognition and reality (San Francisco: W. H. Freeman).
23. Peirce, C. S. 1868, Some consequences of four incapacities, Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2, 140-157. (Reprinted in P. P. Wiener (ed.), Charles S. Peirce—Selected Writings. New York: Dover, 1958.)
24. RASMUSSEN, J. 1986, Information Processing and Human±Machine Interaction: an Approach to Cognitive Engineering (New York: North-Holland).
25. Reason, J. T. 1990, Human Error (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
26. Stanton, N. A., Ashleigh, M. j., Roberts, A. D. and Xu, F. 2001, Testing Hollnagel’s contextual control model: assessing team behaviour in a human supervisory control task, International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 5, 21-33.
27. Vicente, K. J., Christoffersen K. and Pereklita, A. 1995, Supporting operator problem solving through ecological interface design, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 25, 529-545.
28. Volta, G. 1986, Time and decision, in E. Hollnagel, G. Mancini and D. D. Woods (eds), Intelligent Decision Support in Process Environments (Berlin: Springer), 45-57.
29. WORM, A. 2001, Breaking the barriers: Facilitating efficient command and control in multiservice emergency management, 8th World Conference on Emergency Management (TIEMS), 19-22 June, Oslo, Norway.
30. Yoshida, H., Takeda, M., Hayashi, Y. and Hollnagel, E. 1997, Cognitive control beha-vior of the operator in the emergency, in P. Seppala, T. Luopajarvi, C.-H. Nygard and M. Mattila (eds), Proceedings of the 13th Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, 29 June-4 July 1997, Tampere, Finland, Vol. 3 (Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health), 82-84.