The advancement of a new human factors report - 'The Unique Report' - facilitating flight crew auditing of performance/operations as part of an airline's safety management system

Ergonomics

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 164-183

  Leva, M C ^a   Cahill, J ^a   Kay, A M ^a   Losa, G ^b   McDonald, N ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b Iberia Airlines ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Accident reporting; Aviation psychology; Flight plan; Human factors; Incident reports; Line operations safety audit; Performance management; Safety management system; Threat and error management

Indexed keywords

ERROR MANAGEMENT; FLIGHT PLANS; HUMAN FACTORS; INCIDENT REPORTS; LINE OPERATIONS; PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT; SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; THREAT AND ERROR MANAGEMENT;

AIR TRANSPORTATION; AVIATION; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL; RESEARCH;

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS;

ARTICLE; AVIATION; BIOENGINEERING; HUMAN; MANDATORY REPORTING; METHODOLOGY; SAFETY; STANDARD;

AVIATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; MANDATORY REPORTING; SAFETY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 75649096360     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130903437131     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Cahill, J. and Losa, G., 2007. Flight crew task performance and the design of cockpit task support tools. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2007 (ECCE 2007), 28-31 August, Covent Garden, London, UK. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 250, ISBN 978-1-84799-849-1.
2. Cahill, J., et al., 2007. HILAS flight operations research: Development of risk/safety management, process improvement and task support tools. In: D. Harris, ed. Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics, HCII 2007, LNAI 4562. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 648-657.
3. Carroll, J.M., 2001. Community computing as humancomputer interaction. Behaviour and Information Technology, 20 (5), 307-314.
4. European Commission, 2001. Group of personalities. European aeronautics: A vision for 2020. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985.
5. FAA, 2005. LOSA advisor circular, resubmitted to AFS-230, FAA, 13 January. Washington, DC: FAA.
6. Gilbreth, F. and Gilbreth, L., 1921. Time and motion study as fundamental factors in planning and control. Shaftesbury, VT: The Mountainside Press.
7. Helmreich, R.L., Klinect, J.R., and Wilhelm, J.A., 1999. Models of event, error, and response in flight operations. In: R.S. Jensen, ed. Proceedings of the tenth international symposium on aviation psychology. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University, 124-129.
8. Helmerich, R.L., Klinect, J.R., and Wilhelm, J.A., 2001. System safety and threat and error management: The line operations safety audit (LOSA). In: Proceedings of the eleventh international symposium on aviation psychology. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, 1-6.
9. Huber, G.P., 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2 (1), 88-115.
10. International Civil Aviation Organization, 2006a. Safety management manual. Doc 9859-AN/460. Montreal, Quebec: ICAO.
11. International Civil Aviation Organization, 2006b. ECCAIRS 4.2.6 data definition [online]. Available from: standard. http://www.icao.int/anb/aig/Taxonomy/ [Accessed 4 August 2008].
12. Klinect, J.R., et al., 2003. Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA): Definition and operating characteristics. In: Proceedings of the twelfth international symposium on aviation psychology. Dayton, OH: The Ohio state University, 663-668.
13. McDonald, N., 2007. Human integration in the lifecycle of aviation systems. In: D. Harris, ed. Engineering psychology and cognitive ergonomics, HCII 2007, LNAI 4562. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 648-657.
14. Muller, M., 1991. PICTIVE - An exploration in participatory design. In: Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference Proceedings, New Orleans, LA, USA, ACM Press, 225-231.
15. Muller, M. and Kuhn, S., 1993. Special issue on participatory design. Communications of the ACM, 36.
16. O'Hare, D., 2006. Cognitive functions and performance shaping factors in aviation accidents and incidents. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16 (2), 145-156.
17. Oxford English Dictionary, 1989. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
18. Patankar, M.S. and Taylor, J.C., 2008. MRM training, evaluation, and safety management. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 18 (1), 61-71.
19. Read, J.C., 2008. Using wizard of Oz to evaluate mobile applications. In: J. Lumdsen, ed. Handbook of research on user interface design and evaluation for mobile technology. Information science reference, ISBN: 978-1-59904-871-0, Vol. 2, Ch. XLVII, 802-812.
20. Straeter, O., 2004. Considerations of the elements of quantifying human reliability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 83 (2), 225-264.
21. Thomas, M.J.W., 2004. Predictors of threat and error management: identification of core non-technical skills and implications for training system design. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14 (2), 207-231.
22. Turner, B.A. and Pidgeon, N.F., 1997. Man-made disasters, 2nd edition. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
23. Wiegmann, D.A. and von Thaden, T.L., 2003. Using schematic aids to improve recall in incident reporting: the critical event reporting tool (CERT). International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13 (2), 153-171.