Erratum to Do student achievement outcomes differ across teacher preparation programs? An analysis of teacher education in Louisiana (Journal of Teacher Education, (2012), 63, (304-317), 10.1177/0022487112439894);Do Student Achievement Outcomes Differ Across Teacher Preparation Programs? An Analysis of Teacher Education in Louisiana

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 304-317

  Gansle, Kristin A ^a   Noell, George H ^a,b   Burns, Jeanne M ^c  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Louisiana State Department of Education   (United States)

^c Louisiana Board of Regents   (United States)

Author keywords

multivariate longitudinal analysis; student outcomes; teacher preparation; value added assessment

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867680301     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487112470806a     Document Type: Erratum

References (43)

1. Anderman E. M.,Anderman L. H.,Yough M. S.,Gimbert B. G.Value-added models of assessment: Implications for motivation and accountability.Educational Psychologist. 2010;45:123-137.
2. AndersonN. (2011, March10). Most schools could face "failing" label under No Child Left Behind, Duncan says. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.thewashingtonpost.com/local/education/duncan-most-schools-could-face-failing-label/2011/03/09/AB7L2hP_story.html.
3. BakerE. L.BartonP. E.Darling-HammondL.HaertelE.LaddH. F.LinnR. L. ShepardL. A. (2010). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers. Washington, DC: The Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://epi.3cdn.net/b9667271ee6c154195_t9m6iij8k.pdf.
4. Ballou D.,Sanders W.,Wright P.Controlling for student background in value-added assessment of teachers.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2004;29:37-65.
5. Boyd D. J.,Grossman P. L.,Lankford H.,Loeb S.,Wyckoff J.Teacher preparation and student achievement.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2009;31:416-440.
6. Cochran-Smith M.,Zeichner K. M.Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association; 2005a:1-36.
7. Cochran-Smith M.,Zeichner K. M.Studying teacher education. New York, NY: Routledge; 2005b:.
8. Darling-Hammond L.,Bransford J.Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2005:.
9. DeWeeseT. (2007, December25). Why is public education failing? Retrieved from http://www.newswithviews.com/DeWeese/tom100.htm.
10. Duckworth A. L.,Quinn P. D.,Seligman M. E. P.Positive predictors of teacher effectiveness.Journal of Positive Psychology. 2009;4:540-547.
11. Glazerman S.,Loeb S.,Goldhaber D.,Raudenbush S.,Staiger D.,Whitehurst G.Evaluating teachers: The important role of value-added. Washington, DC: The Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings; 2010:.
12. Goldhaber D.,Brewer D.Why don't schools and teachers seem to matter? Measuring the impact of unobservables on educational productivity.Journal of Human Resources. 1997;32:505-523.
13. Hanson G. R.Critical issues in the assessment of value added in education.New Directions for Institutional Research. 1988;59:53-67.
14. Harris D.Measurement issues and assessment for teaching quality. Gitomer D., ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2009:99-130.
15. Hart C. W. L.,Bogan C. E.The Baldrige: What it is, how it's won, how to use it to improve quality in your company. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1992:.
16. Heitin L.Evaluation system weighing down Tennessee teachers.Education Week. 2011;31 1 (8): 14-15.
17. Hershberg T.,Simon V.,Lea-Kruger B.The revelations of value-added: An assessment model that measures student growth in ways that NCLB fails to do.School Administrator. 2004;61 (11): 10-13.
18. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. (2004). Pub. L. No 108-446, 20 USC 1400.
19. Koretz D. M.Limitations in the use of achievement tests as measures of educators' productivity.Journal of Human Resources. 2002;37:752-777.
20. Krovetz M. L.Fostering resilience: Expecting all students to use their minds and hearts well. 2008). Fostering resilience: Expecting all students to use their minds and hearts well (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press; 2008:.
21. Lasley T. J.,Siedentop D.,Yinger R.A systemic approach to enhancing teacher quality: The Ohio model.Journal of Teacher Education. 2006;57:13-21.
22. Louisiana Department of Education. (2008a). iLEAP 2008 technical summary. Retrieved from http://www.louisianaschools.net/lde/uploads/13125.pdf.
23. Louisiana Department of Education. (2008b). LEAP GEE 2008 technical summary. Retrieved from http://www.louisianaschools.net/lde/uploads/13306.pdf.
24. McCaffrey D. F.,Lockwood J. R.,Kortez D. M.,Hamilton L. S.Evaluating value-added models for teacher accountability. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2003:.
25. McCaffrey D. F.,Lockwood J. R.,Kortez D. M.,Louis T. A.,Hamilton L. S.Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2004;29:67-102.
26. McCulloch C. E.,Searle S. R.Generalized, linear, and mixed models. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2001:.
27. McNeil M.Starting gun sounds for "Race to the Top.".Education Week. 2009;29 1 (12): 18-19.
28. No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). Pub. L. No. 107-110, §1601 et seq. (2002).
29. Noell G. H.,Burns J. L.Value-added assessment of teacher preparation: An illustration of emerging technology.Journal of Teacher Education. 2006;57:37-50.
30. NoellG. H.GansleK. A.PattR. M.SchaferM. J. (2009). Value added assessment of teacher preparation in Louisiana: 2005-2006 to 2007-2008. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Department of Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.laregentsarchive.com/Academic/TE/2009/2008-09VATechnical(8.24.09).pdf.
31. NoellG. H.PorterB. A.PattR. M. (2007). Value added assessment of teacher preparation in Louisiana: 2004-2006. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Department of Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.laregentsarchive.com/Academic/TE/2008/Final%20Value-Added%20Report%20(12.02.08).pdf.
32. NoellG. H.PorterB. A.PattR. M.DahirA. (2008).Value added assessment of teacher preparation in Louisiana: 2004-2005 to 2006-2007. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Department of Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.laregentsarchive.com/Academic/TE/2009/2008-09VATechnical(8.24.09).pdf.
33. Olson L.Houston board OKs revamped performance-pay plan.Education Week. 2007;27 (4): 11.
34. Papay J. P.Different tests, different answers: The stability of teacher value-added estimates across outcome measures.American Educational Research Journal. 2010;48:163-193.
35. PostalL.RothL. (2011, July19). More than 150 "failing" schools must allow student transfers. The Orlando Sentinel. Retrieved from http://articles.orlandosentinel.com.
36. Raudenbush S. W.What are value-added models estimating and what does this imply for statistical practice?.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2004;29:121-129.
37. Raudenbush S. W.,Bryk A. S.Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.London, England: SAGE; 2002:.
38. Reusser J.,Butler L.,Symonds M.,Vetter R.,Wall T. J.An assessment system for teacher education program quality improvement.International Journal of Educational Management. 2007;21:105-113.
39. Rice J. K.Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute; 2003:.
40. SawchukS. (2010). New vigor propelling training. Education Week, 30(13), 1-20. Available from http://search.ebscohost.com.
41. Tekwe C. D.,Carter R. L.,Ma C.,Algina J.,Lucas M. E.,Roth J., Resnick M. B.An empirical comparison of statistical models for value added assessment of school performance.Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2004;29:11-37.
42. Todd P. E.,Wolpin K. I.On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement.Economic Journal. 2003;113:3-33.
43. Wilson S.,Floden R. Y.,Ferrini-Mundy J.Teacher preparation research: Content knowledge, gaps and recommendations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2001:.