A systemic approach to enhancing teacher quality the Ohio model

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 13-21

  Lasley II, Thomas J ^a   Siedentop, Daryl ^b   Yinger, Robert ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

Ohio Teacher Quality Partnership; Professional development; Teacher preparation

Indexed keywords

EID: 32044468524     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487105284455     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Belcher, E. (2004, December 12). Among kids, Ohio doesn't compare. Dayton Daily News, p. B6.
2. Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
3. Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). The problem of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(4), 295-299.
4. Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research on Teacher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved July 18, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1/2000
6. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Kanstoroom, M., & Finn, C. E., Jr. (1999). Better teachers, better schools. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
8. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
9. Olsen, L. (2004, November 17). Researchers debate merits of "value-added" measures. Education Week, pp. 14-15.
10. RAND Corporation. (2004). The promise and peril of using value-added modeling to measure teacher effectiveness (Education Research Brief No. RB-9050-EDU). Santa Monica, CA: Author.
11. Sanders, W. L. (1998). Value-added assessment. The School Administrator, 55(11), 24-27.
12. Vergari, S., & Hess, F. M. (2002). The accreditation game. Education Next, 2(3), 48-57.
13. Viadero, D. (2005, June 22). Review panel turns up little evidence to back teacher ed. practices. Education Week, pp. 1, 20.
14. Walsh K., & Snyder, E. (2004). NCTQ reports. Washington, DC: National Council on Teacher Quality.
15. Wenglinsky, H. (2002). The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20(12). Retrieved July 18, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/