Traveling down the road: From cognitive neuroscience to mathematics education ... and back

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 649-654

  de Smedt, Bert ^a   Verschaffel, Lieven ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867513420     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-010-0282-5     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ansari, D., & Coch, D. (2006). Bridges over troubled waters: Education and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 146-151.
2. Bornemann, B., Foth, M., Horn, J., Ries, J., Warmuth, E., Wartenburger, I., et al. (2010). Mathematical cognition-Individual differences in resource allocation. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0253-x.
3. Butterworth, B., & Laurillard, D. (2010). Low numeracy and dyscalculia: Identification and intervention. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0267-4.
4. Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2008). Neuroimaging as a new tool in the toolbox of psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 62-67.
5. De Corte, E., Greer, B., & Verschaffel, L. (1996). Learning and teaching mathematics. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 491-549). New York: MacMillan.
6. De Smedt, B., Ansari, D., Grabner, R. H., Hannula, M. M., Schneider, M., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Cognitive neuroscience meets mathematics education. Educational Research Review, 5, 97-105.
7. Dowker, A. (2005). Individual differences in arithmetic. Implications for psychology, neuroscience and education. Hove: Psychology Press.
8. Gabrieli, J. E. D. (2009). Dyslexia: A new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325, 280-283.
9. Grabner, R. H., & Ansari, D. (2010). Promises and pitfalls of a "cognitive neuroscience of mathematics learning". ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0283-4.
10. Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15-46). New York: MacMillan.
11. Howard-Jones, P. (2008). Education and neuroscience [special issue]. Educational Research, 50(2):119-201.
12. Landgraf, S., van der Meer, E., & Krueger, F. (2010). Cognitive resource allocation for neuronal activity underlying mathematical cognition: A multi-method study. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0264-7.
13. Lee, K., Yeong, S. H. M., Ng, S. F., Venkatraman, V., Graham, S., & Chee, M. W. L. (2010). Computing solutions to algebraic problems using a symbolic vs. a schematic strategy. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0265-6.
14. Luna, B., Garver, K. E., Urban, T. A., Lazar, N. A., & Sweeney, J. A. (2004). Maturation of cognitive processes from late childhood to adulthood. Child Development, 75, 1357-1372.
15. Menon, V. (2010). Developmental cognitive neuroscience of arithmetic: Implications for learning and education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0242-0.
16. Nickerson, S. D., & Whitacre, I. (2010). A local instruction theory for the development of number sense. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 3, 227-252.
17. Obersteiner, A., Dresler, T., Reiss, K., Vogel, C. M., Pekrun, R., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2010). Bringing brain imaging to the school to assess arithmetic problem solving. Chances and limitations in combining educational and neuroscientific research. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0256-7.
18. Preusse, F., van der Meer, E., Ullwer, D., Brucks, M., Krueger, F., & Wartenburger, I. (2010). Long-term characteristics of analogical processing in high-school students with high fluid intelligence. An fMRI study. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0259-4.
19. Sloane, F. C. (2008). Randomized trials in mathematics education: Recalibrating the proposed high watermark. Educational Researcher, 9, 624-630.
20. Stavy, R., & Babai, R. (2010). Overcoming intuitive interference in mathematics: Insights from behavioural, brain imaging and intervention studies. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0251-z.
21. Stern, E. (2005). Pedagogy meets neuroscience. Science, 310, 745.
22. Stern, E., & Schneider, M. (2010). Editorial: A digital roadmap analogy of the relation between neuroscience and educational research. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0278-1.
23. Tang, Y. Y., Zhang, W. T., Chen, K. W., Feng, S. G., Ji, Y., Shen, J. X., et al. (2006). Arithmetic processing in the brain shaped by cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 10775-10780.
24. Thomas, M. J., Wilson, A. J., Corballis, M. C., Lim, V. K., & Yoon, C. (2010). Evidence from cognitive neuroscience for the role of graphical and algebraic representations in understanding function. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0272-7.
25. van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. (2007). Ten steps to complex learning. A systematic approach to four-component instructional design. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Zago, L., Petit, L., Mellet, E., Joliot, M., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2010). Neural correlates of counting large numerosity. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0254-9.
27. Zamarian, L., Ischebeck, A., & Delazer, M. (2009). Neuroscience of learning arithmetic-Evidence from brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 909-925.