Evidence from cognitive neuroscience for the role of graphical and algebraic representations in understanding function

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 607-619

  Thomas, Michael O J ^a   Wilson, Anna J ^a,b   Corballis, Michael C ^a   Lim, Vanessa K ^a   Yoon, Caroline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Algebra; Conversion; FMRI; Function; Graphs; Mathematical cognition; Representation; Versatility

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867487338     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-010-0272-7     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Akkoc, H., & Tall, D. O. (2002). The simplicity, complexity and complication of the function concept. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 25-32). Norwich: IGPME.
2. Anderson, J. R., Qin, Y., Sohn, M.-H., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2003). An information-processing model of the BOLD response in symbol manipulation tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 241-261.
3. Ansari, D. (2008). Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(4), 278-291.
4. Ansari, D., Dhital, B., & Siong, S. C. (2006). Parametric effects of numerical distance on the intraparietal sulcus during passive viewing of rapid numerosity changes. Brain Research, 1067(1), 181.
5. Baroody, A. J., & Dowker, A. (Eds.). (2003). The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Bruer, J. T. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 26(8), 4-16.
7. Cantlon, J. F., Brannon, E. M., Carter, E. J., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2006). Functional imaging of numerical processing in adults and 4-y-old children. PLoS Biology, 4(5), e125.
8. Cantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 83-91.
9. Catani, M., Jones, D. K., & ffytche, D. H. (2005). Perisylvian language networks of the human brain. Annals of Neurology, 57(1), 8-16.
10. Chein, J. M., Fissell, K., Jacobs, S., & Fiez, J. A. (2002). Functional heterogeneity within Broca's area during verbal working memory. Physiology & Behavior, 77(4-5), 635-639.
11. Chinnappan, M., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2001). Prospective teachers' perspectives on function representations. In J. Bobis, B. Perry, & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Numeracy and beyond. Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 155-162). Sydney: MERGA.
12. Chochon, F., Cohen, L., van de Moortele, P. F., & Dehaene, S. (1999). Differential contributions of the left and right inferior parietal lobules to number processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 617-630.
13. Cobb, P. (2000). From representations to symbolizing: Introductory comments on semiotics and mathematical learning. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing, communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspective on discourse, tools and instructional design. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Cohen Kadosh, R., Kadosh, K. C., & Henik, A. (2008). When brightness counts: The neuronal correlate of numerical-luminance interference. Cerebral Cortex, 18(2), 337-343.
15. Cohen Kadosh, R., & Walsh, V. (2009). Numerical representation in the parietal lobes: Abstract or not abstract? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(3-4), 313-328.
16. Culham, J. C., & Kanwisher, N. G. (2001). Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 11(2), 157-163.
17. Danker, J. F., & Anderson, J. R. (2007). The roles of prefrontal and posterior parietal cortex in algebra problem solving: A case of using cognitive modeling to inform neuroimaging data. Neuro-Image, 35(3), 1365.
18. de Saussure, F. (1966). Course in general linguistics. C. Bally & A. Sechehaye, in collaboration with Albert Riedlinger (Eds.) (W. Baskin, Trans.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19. Dehaene, S. (2009). Origins of mathematical intuitions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 232-259.
20. Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487-506.
21. Delazer, M., Ischebeck, A., Domahs, F., Zamarian, L., Koppelstaetter, F., Siedentopf, C. M., et al. (2005). Learning by strategies and learning by drill-evidence from an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 25(3), 838.
22. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103-131.
23. Eisenberg, T., & Dreyfus, T. (1991). On the reluctance to visualize in mathematics. In W. Zimmermann & S. Cunningham (Eds.), Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics. MAA Notes #19.
24. Even, R. (1998). Factors involved in linking representations of functions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17, 105-121.
25. Even, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2006). Implications of competing interpretations of practice for research and theory in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103-131.
26. Fias, W., Lammertyn, J., Reynvoet, B., Dupont, P., & Orban, G. A. (2003). Parietal representation of symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 47-56.
27. Grabner, R. H., Ansari, D., Reishofer, G., Stern, E., Ebner, F., & Neuper, C. (2007). Individual differences in mathematical competence predict parietal brain activation during mental calculation. NeuroImage, 38(2), 346-356.
28. Grabner, R. H., Ischebeck, A., Reishofer, G., Koschutnig, K., Delazer, M., Ebner, F., et al. (2009). Fact learning in complex arithmetic and figural-spatial tasks: The role of the angular gyrus and its relation to mathematical competence. Human Brain Mapping, 30(9), 2936-2952.
29. Hatano, G., & Oura, Y. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 26-29.
30. Heinze, A., Star, J. R., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Flexible and adaptive use of strategies and representations in mathematics education. ZDM, 45(1), 535-540.
31. Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 6, 435-448.
32. Ischebeck, A., Zamarian, L., Egger, K., Schocke, M., & Delazer, M. (2007). Imaging early practice effects in arithmetic. NeuroImage, 36(3), 993.
33. Kaufmann, L., Vogel, S. E., Wood, G., Kremser, C., Schocke, M., Zimmerhackl, L.-B., & Koten, J. W. (2008). A developmental fMRI study of nonsymbolic numerical and spatial processing. Cortex, 44(4), 376-385.
34. Knops, A., Thirion, B., Hubbard, E. M., Michel, V., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science, 324(5934), 1583-1585.
35. Krueger, F., Spampinato, M. V., Pardini, M., Pajevic, S., Wood, J. N., Weiss, G. H., et al. (2008). Integral calculus problem solving: An fMRI investigation. Neuroreport, 19(11), 1095-1099.
36. Kucian, K., Loenneker, T., Dietrich, T., Dosch, M., Martin, E., & von Aster, M. (2006). Impaired neural networks for approximate calculation in dyscalculic children: A functional MRI study. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2, 31.
37. Lee, K., Lim, Z. Y., Yeong, S. H. M., Ng, S. F., Venkatraman, V., & Chee, M. W. L. (2007). Strategic differences in algebraic problem solving: Neuroanatomical correlates. Brain Research, 1155, 163-171.
38. Lerman, S. (1994). Articulating theories of mathematics learning. In E. Paul (Ed.), Constructing mathematical knowledge: Epistemology and mathematics education. London: The Falmer Press.
39. Lesh, R. (1999). The development of representational abilities in middle school mathematics. In I. E. Sigel (Ed.), Development of mental representation: Theories and application (pp. 323-350). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Lesh, R. (2000). What mathematical abilities are most needed for success beyond school in a technology based age of information. In M. O. J. Thomas (Ed.), Proceedings of TIME2000 an international conference on technology in mathematics education (pp. 72-82). Auckland: The University of Auckland.
41. Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge-Falmer.
42. Mason, J. (2008). Doing ≠ construing and doing + discussing ≠ learning: The importance of the structure of attention. Proceedings of ICME-10, Copenhagen (CD version of proceedings). http://www.icme10.dk/proceedings/pages/regular_pdf/RL_John_Mason.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2009.
43. Mason, J., & Spence, M. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 38, 135-161.
44. Menon, V., Rivera, S. M., White, C. D., Glover, G. H., & Reiss, A. L. (2000). Dissociating prefrontal and parietal cortex activation during arithmetic processing. NeuroImage, 12, 357-365.
45. Naccache, L., & Dehaene, S. (2001). The priming method: Imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. Cerebral Cortex, 11(10), 966-974.
46. Neider, A. (2005). Counting on neurons: The neurobiology of numerical competence. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 6, 177-190.
47. Nistal, A. A., Van Dooren, W., Clarebout, G., Elen, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Conceptualising, investigating, and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem-solving and learning: A critical review. ZDM, 45(1), 627-636.
48. Otte, M. (2006). Mathematical epistemology from a Peircean semiotic point of view. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 11-38.
49. Peirce, C. S. (1894). What is a sign? http://members.door.net/arisbe/menu/library/bycsp/bycsp.htm. Accessed 29 Oct 2007.
50. Pesenti, M., Thioux, M., Seron, X., & De Volder, A. (2000). Neuroanatomical substrates of Arabic number processing, numerical comparison, and simple addition: A PET study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(3), 461-479.
51. Piazza, M., Izard, V., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Tuning curves for approximate numerosity in the human intraparietal sulcus. Neuron, 44, 547-555.
52. Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2007). A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron, 53(2), 293.
53. Pinel, P., Piazza, M., Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2004). Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number size and luminance during comparative judgements. Neuron, 41, 983-993.
54. Presmeg, N. (2006). Semiotics and the "connections" standard: Significance of semiotics for teachers of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 163-182.
55. Qin, Y., Carter, C. S., Silk, E., Stenger, V. A., Fissell, K., Goode, A., et al. (2004). The change of the brain activation patterns as children learn algebra equation solving. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 101(15), 5686-5691.
56. Rosano, C., Sweeney, J. A., Melchitzky, D. S., & Lewis, D. A. (2003). The human precentral sulcus: chemoarchitecture of a region corresponding to the frontal eye fields. Brain Research, 972(1-2), 16-30.
57. Saenz-Ludlow, A., & Presmeg, N. (2006). Guest editorial: Semiotic perspectives on learning mathematics and communicating mathematically. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 1-10.
58. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime users guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
59. Simon, O., Kherif, F., Flandin, G., Poline, J.-B., Riviere, D., Mangin, J.-F., et al. (2004). Automatized clustering and functional geometry of human parietofrontal networks for language, space, and number. NeuroImage, 23(3), 1192.
60. Simon, O., Mangin, J., Cohen, L., Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Topographical layout of hand, eye, calculation and language related areas in the human parietal lobe. Neuron, 33(3), 475-487.
61. Sohn, M.-H., Goode, A., Koedinger, K. R., Stenger, V. A., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., et al. (2004). Behavioral equivalence, but not neural equivalence-neural evidence of alternative strategies in mathematical thinking. Nature Neuroscience, 7(11), 1193.
62. Sternberg, R. J. (2003). What is an "expert student"? Educational Researcher, 32(8), 5-9.
63. Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2007). Embodied, symbolic and formal thinking in linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(7), 927-937.
64. Stocco, A., & Anderson, J. R. (2008). Endogenous control and task representation: An fMRI study in algebraic problem-solving. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(7), 1300-1314.
65. Szucs, D., & Goswami, U. (2007). Educational neuroscience: Defining a new discipline for the study of mental representations. Mind, Brain and Education, 1(3), 114-127.
66. Tall, D. O., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169.
67. Thomas, M. O. J. (2003). The role of representation in teacher understanding of function. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 291-298). Honolulu: University of Hawai'i.
68. Thomas, M. O. J. (2008). Developing versatility in mathematical thinking. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7(2), 67-87.
69. Thomas, M. O. J., & Hong, Y. Y. (2001). Representations as conceptual tools: Process and structural perspectives. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 257-264). Utrecht: Utrecht University.
70. Thomas, M. O. J., Wilson, A. J., Corballis, M. C., & Lim, V. K. (2008). Neuropsychological evidence for the role of graphical and algebraic representations in understanding function. In M. Goos, K. Makar, & R. Brown (Eds.), Navigating currents and charting directions. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australasia (pp. 515-521). MERGA Inc: Brisbane.
71. Tootell, R. B. H., Hadjikhani, N. K., Vanduffel, W., Liu, A. K., Mendola, J. D., Sereno, M. I., et al. (1998). Functional analysis of primary visual cortex (V1) in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(3), 811-817.
72. Varma, S., McCandliss, B. D., & Schwartz, D. (2008). Scientific and pragmatic challenges for bridging education and neuroscience. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 140-152.
73. Venkatraman, V., Ansari, D., & Chee, M. W. L. (2005). Neural correlates of symbolic and non-symbolic arithmetic. Neuropsychologia, 43(5), 744.
74. Venkatraman, V., Siong, S. C., Chee, M. W. L., & Ansari, D. (2006). Effect of language switching on arithmetic: A bilingual fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(1), 64.
75. Williams, C. G. (1998). Using concept maps to assess conceptual knowledge of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 414-421.
76. Wilson, A. J., Thomas, M. O. J., Lim, V. K., & Corballis, M. C. (2008). Parietal areas involved in format-independent representation of mathematical functions. Poster presented at Human Brain Mapping, Melbourne, Australia.
77. Yackel, E. (2000). Introduction: Perspectives on semiotics and instructional design. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel, & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing, communicating in mathematics classrooms: Perspective on discourse, tools and instructional design (pp. 1-13). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
78. Zamarian, L., Ischebeck, A., & Delazer, M. (2009). Neuroscience of learning arithmetic-evidence from brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(6), 909-925.