Using In-Service and Coaching to Increase Teachers' Accurate Use of Research-Based Strategies

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 348-361

  Kretlow, Allison G ^a   Cooke, Nancy L ^b   Wood, Charles L ^b  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

coaching; fidelity; professional development

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867373776     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741932510395397     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Armendariz F.,Umbreit J.Using active responding to reduce disruptive behavior in a general education classroom.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 1999;1:152-158.
2. Barbetta P. M.,Heron T. E.,Heron W. L.Relative effects of whole-word and phonetic-prompt error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of sight words by students with developmental disabilities.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1993;26:99-110.
3. Barbetta P. M.,Heward W. L.,Bradley D. M.,Miller A. D.Effects of immediate and delayed error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of sight words by students with developmental disabilities.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1994;27:177-178.
4. Bell J.,Bell M.Everyday Mathematics. Grade 1. Chicago, IL: SRA/McGraw-Hill; 2004:.
5. Blakely M. R.A survey of levels of supervisory support and maintenance of effects reported by educators involved in direct instruction implementation.Journal of Direct Instruction. 2001;1:73-83.
6. Brent G.,DiObilda N.Curriculum alignment verses direct instruction: Effects on stable and mobile urban children.Journal of Educational Research. 1993;86:333-338.
7. Burns M.,Ysseldyke J.Reported prevalence of evidence-based instructional practices in special education.Journal of Special Education. 2009;4:3-11.
8. Buzhardt J.,Greenwood C. R.,Abbott M.,Tapia Y.Scaling up ClassWide Peer Tutoring: Investigating barriers to wide-scale implementation from a distance.Learning Disabilities-A Contemporary Journal. 2007;5:75-96.
9. Christie C. A.,Schuster J. W.The effects of using response cards on student participation, academic achievement, and on-task behavior during whole-class, math instruction.Journal of Behavioral Education. 2003;12:147-165.
10. Cooper J. O.,Heron T. E.,Heward W. L.Applied behavior analysis. 2007). Promoting generalized behavior change. In CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed., pp. 613-656). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.Cooper J. O.Heron T. E.Heward W. L., ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall; 2007:613-656.
11. Crawford D. B.,Snider V. E.Effective mathematics instruction: The importance of curriculum.Education and Treatment of Children. 2000;23:122-142.
12. Delquadri J.,Greenwood C. R.,Stretton K.,Hall R. V.The peer tutoring game: A classroom procedure for increasing opportunity to respond and spelling performance.Education and Treatment of Children. 1983;6:225-239.
13. Desimone L. M.,Porter A. C.,Garet M. S.,Yoon K. S.,Birman B. F.Effects of professional development on teachers' instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 2002;24:81-112.
14. Engelmann S.,Carnine D.,Kelly B.,Engelmann O.Connecting math concepts. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill; 1996:.
15. Foorman B. R.,Schatschneider C.Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning. Vaughn S.Briggs K. L., ed. Baltimore, MD: Brookes; 2003:.
16. Fuchs L. S.,Fuchs D.,Hamlett C. L.,Ferguson C.Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task.Exceptional Children. 1992;58:436-450.
17. Gagnon J. C.,Maccini P.Teacher-reported use of empirically validated and standards-based instructional approaches in secondary mathematics.Remedial and Special Education. 2007;28:43-56.
18. Gettinger M.Effects of error correction on third graders' spelling.Journal of Educational Research. 1993;87:39-45.
19. Gleason M. M.,Hall T. E.Focusing on instructional design to implement a performance-based teacher training program.Education and Treatment of Children. 1991;14:316-332.
20. Godfrey S. A.,Grisham-Brown J.,Schuster J. W.,Hemmeter M. L.The effects of three techniques on student participation with preschool children with attending problems.Education and Treatment of Children. 2003;26:255-272.
21. Greenwood C. R.,Abbott M.The research to practice gap in special education.Teacher Education and Special Education. 2001;24:276-289.
22. Greenwood C. R.,Delquadri J. C.,Hall R. V.Focus on behavior analysis in education. Heward W. L.Heron T. E.Hill D. S.Trap-Porter J., ed. Columbus, OH: Merrill; 1984:58-88.
23. Greenwood C. R.,Hart B.,Walker D.,Risley T. R.Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction. Gardner R.Sainato D. M.Cooper J. O.Heron T. E.Heward W. L.Eshleman J. W.Grossi T. A., ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1994:213-223.
24. Greenwood C. R.,Maheady L.Are future teachers aware of the gap between research and practice and what they should know.Teacher Education and Special Education. 2001;24:333-347.
25. Greer R. D.Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction. Gardner R.Sainato D. M.Cooper J. O.Heron T. E.Heward W. L.Eshleman J. W.Grossi T. A., ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1994:161-171.
26. Gunter P. J.,Reffel J. M.,Barnett C. A.,Lee J. M.,Patrick J.Academic response rates in elementary school classrooms.Education and Treatment of Children. 2004;27:105-113.
27. Heward W. L.Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior instruction. Gardner R.Sainato D. M.Cooper J. O.Heron T. E.Heward W. L.Eshleman J. W.Grossi T. A., ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1994:283-320.
28. Hollingsworth M.,Woodward J.Integrated learning: Explicit strategies and their role in problem-solving instruction for students with learning disabilities.Exceptional Children. 1993;59:444-455.
29. Idol-Maestas L.Group story mapping: A comprehension strategy for both skilled and unskilled readers. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Reading; 1995:.
30. Institute for Education Sciences. (2007). What Works Clearinghouse intervention report: Everyday Mathematics. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/WWC_Everyday_Math_043007.pdf.
31. Jackson B.,Larzelere R.,St. Clair L.,Corr M.,Fichter C.,Egertson H.The impact of HeadsUp! Reading on early childhood educators' literacy practices and preschool children's literacy skills.Early Childhood Research Quarterly. 2006;21:213-226.
32. Jager B.,Reezigt G. J.,Creemers B. P.The effects of teacher training on new instructional behavior in reading comprehension.Teaching and Teacher Education. 2002;18:831-842.
33. Joyce B.,Showers B.Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal. New York, NY: Longman; 1995:.
34. Kamps D. M.Enhanced small group instruction using choral responding and student interaction for children with autism and developmental disabilities.American Journal on Mental Retardation. 1994;99:60-73.
35. Kohler D. W.,Crilley K.,Shearer D. D.Effects of peer coaching on teacher and student outcomes.Journal of Educational Research. 2001;90:240-250.
36. Kohler D. W.,Ezell H. K.,Paluselli M.Promoting changes in teachers' conduct of student pair activities: An examination of reciprocal peer coaching.Journal of Special Education. 1999;33:154-165.
37. Kretlow A. G.,Bartholomew C. C.Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies.Teacher Education and Special Education. 2010;33:279-299.
38. Kretlow A. G.,Wood C. L.,Cooke N. L.Using inservice and coaching to improve kindergarten teachers accurate delivery of instructional units.Journal of Special Education. 2010;:.
39. Lambert M. C.The effects of increasing active student responding with response cards during mathematics instruction on the disruptive behavior of fourth-grade urban learners.Dissertation Abstracts International. 2002;62 (8): 2727.
40. Lambert M. C.,Cartledge G.,Heward W. L.,Lo Y.Effects of response cards on disruptive behavior and academic responding during math lessons by fourth-grade urban students.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 2006;8:88-99.
41. Maheady L. Presented at the annual convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International; 2008Chicago, IL; 2008.
42. Maheady L.,Harper G. F.,Mallette B.,Karnes M.Preparing preservice teachers to implement class wide peer tutoring.Teacher Education and Special Education. 2004;27:52-62.
43. McKenzie M. A.,Marchand-Martella N. E.,Martella R. C.,Moore M. E.Teaching basic math skills to preschoolers using Connecting Math Concepts: Level K.Journal of Direct Instruction. 2004;4:85-94.
44. Morgan R. L.,Menlove R.,Salzberg C. L.,Hudson P.Effects of peer coaching on the acquisition of direct instruction skills by low-performing teachers.Journal of Special Education. 1994;28:59-76.
45. Nelson J. S.,Alber S. R.,Gordy A.Effects of systematic error correction and repeated readings on the reading accuracy and proficiency of second graders with disabilities.Education and Treatment of Children. 2004;27:186-198.
46. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 6319 (2008).
47. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2011). North Carolina standard course of study and grade level competencies. Retrieved from http://www.ncpublicschools.org/curriculum/mathematics/scos/.
48. O'Reilly M.F.,Renzaglia A.,Hutchins M.,Koterba-Bass L.,Clayton M.,Halle J.W., et al.Teaching systematic instruction competencies to special education student teachers: An applied behavioral supervision model.Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped. 1992;17:104-111.
49. Parks C.,Weber K. P.,McLaughlin T. F.The effects of fading, modeling, prompting, and direct instruction on letter legibility for two preschool students with physical and developmental delays.Child and Family Behavior Therapy. 2007;29:13-21.
50. Randolph J. J.Meta-analysis of the research on response cards: Effects on test achievement, quiz achievement, participation, and off-task behavior.Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions. 2007;9:113-128.
51. Sindelar P. T.,Bursuck W. D.,Halle J. W.The effect of two variations of teacher questioning on student performance.Education and Treatment of Children. 1986;9:56-65.
52. Snider V.,Crawford D.Action research: Implementing Connecting Math Concepts.Effective School Practices. 1996;15 (2): 17-26.
53. Stanley S. O.,Greenwood C. R.How much "opportunity to respond" does the minority disadvantaged student receive in school?.Exceptional Children. 1983;49:370-373.
54. Tarver S.,Jung J.A comparison of mathematics achievement and mathematics attitudes of first and second graders instructed with either a discovery learning mathematics curriculum or a direct instruction curriculum.Effective School Practices. 1995;14 (1): 49-57.
55. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act. Washington, DC: Author; 2007:.
56. Van Houten R.Rote vs. rules: A comparison of two teaching and correction strategies for teaching basic subtraction facts.Education and Treatment of Children. 1993;16:147-160.
57. Vreeland M.,Vail J.,Bradley L.,Buetow C.,Cipriano K.,Green C.,... Huth E.Accelerating cognitive growth: The Edison school math project.Effective School Practices. 1994;13 (2): 64-69.
58. Watkins C.,Slocum T.Introduction to direct instruction. Marchand-Martella N. E.Slocum T. A.Martella R. C., ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 2004:28-65.
59. Wayne A. J.,Yoon K. W.,Zhu P.,Cronen S.,Garet M. S.Experimenting with teacher professional development: Motives and methods.Educational Researcher. 2008;37:469-479.
60. Wellington J.Evaluating a mathematics program for adoption: Connecting Math Concepts.Effective School Practices. 1994;13 (2): 70-75.
61. WheatleyR. K. (1986). Effects of hand raising and response card conditions on nine intermediate developmentally handicapped students during and after money instruction (Unpublished master's thesis). Ohio State University, Columbus.
62. YoonK. S.DuncanT.LeeS. W.ScarlossB.ShapleyK. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 003). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.