Exploration and exploitation strategies, profit performance, and the mediating role of strategic learning: Escaping the exploitation trap

Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 18-41

  Sirén, Charlotta A ^a   Kohtamäki, Marko ^a,b   Kuckertz, Andreas ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VAASA   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ambidexterity; Exploitation strategy; Exploitation trap; Exploration strategy; Profit performance; Strategic learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867373633     PISSN: 19324391     EISSN: 1932443X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sej.1126     Document Type: Article

References (126)

1. Aldrich HE, Auster ER. 1986. Even dwarfs started small: liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behavior 8: 165-198.
2. Amburgey TL, Miner AS. 1992. Strategic momentum, the effects of repetitive, positional, and contextual momentum on merger activity. Strategic Management Journal 13(5): 335-348.
3. Anderson BS, Covin JG, Slevin DP. 2009. Understanding the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and strategic learning capability: an empirical investigation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 3(3): 218-240.
4. Armstrong JS, Overton TS. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 16: 396-402.
5. Atuahene-Gima K, Murray J. 2007. Exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development: a social capital perspective on new technology ventures in China. Journal of International Marketing 15(2): 1-29.
6. Auh S, Menguc B. 2005. Balancing exploration and exploitation: the moderating role of competitive intensity. Journal of Business Research 58(12): 1652-1661.
7. Barney JB. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120.
8. Baruch Y. 1999. Response rate in academic studies: a comparative analysis. Human Relations 52(4): 421-438.
9. Benner MJ, Tushman ML. 2003. Exploration, exploitation, and process management: the productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review 28(2): 238-256.
10. Bierly PE, Daly PS. 2007. Alternative knowledge strategies, competitive environment, and organizational performance in small manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 31(4): 493-516.
11. Bierly PE, Hämäläinen T. 1995. Organizational learning and strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Management 11(3): 209-224.
12. Birkinshaw J, Gibson C. 2004. Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review 45(4): 47-55.
13. Bontis N, Crossan MM, Hulland J. 2002. Managing an organizational learning system by aligning stocks and flows. Journal of Management Studies 39(4): 437-469.
14. Bourgeois L III. 1981. On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review 6(1): 29-39.
15. Bromiley P. 1991. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal 34(1): 37-59.
16. Burgelman RA. 1991. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: theory and field research. Organization Science 2: 239-262.
17. Burgelman RA. 2002. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly 47(2): 325-357.
18. Chen EL, Katila R. 2008. Rival interpretations of balancing exploration and exploitation: simultaneous or sequential?In Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management Shane S (ed). John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, U.K.; 197-214.
19. Chin WW. 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research, Marcoulides GA (ed). Laurence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ; 295-336.
20. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128-152.
21. Collis DJ. 1994. Research note: how valuable are organizational capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 15: 143-152.
22. Combs JG, Crook TR, Shook CL. 2005. The dimensionality of organizational performance and its implications for strategic management research. In Research Methodology in Strategy and Management Ketchen DJ, Bergh DD (eds). Elsevier: Oxford, U.K.; 259-286.
23. Cool K, Dierickx I, Jemison D. 1989. Business strategy, market structure, and risk-return relationships: a structural approach. Strategic Management Journal 10(6): 507-522.
24. Covin JG, Green KM, Slevin DP. 2006. Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation-sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 30(1): 57-81.
25. Covin JG, Miles MP. 1999. Corporate entrepreneurship and the pursuit of competitive advantage. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 23(3): 47-63.
26. Covin JG, Prescott JE, Slevin DP. 1990. The effects of technological sophistication on strategic profiles, structure, and firm performance. Journal of Management Studies 27(5): 485-510.
27. Crossan MM, Berdrow I. 2003. Organizational learning and strategic renewal. Strategic Management Journal 24(11): 1087-1105.
28. Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE. 1999. An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review 24(3): 522-537.
29. Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE, Djurfeldt L. 1995. Organizational learning: dimensions for a theory. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(4): 337-360.
30. Cyert RM, March JG. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Basil Blackwell: Cambridge, MA.
31. Davis LL. 1992. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research 5(4): 194-197.
32. Day G. 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing 58(4): 37-52.
33. Deeds DL, Decarolis D, Coombs J. 2000. Dynamic capabilities and new product development in high technology ventures: an empirical analysis of new biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing 15(3): 211-229.
34. Diamantopoulos A. 2008. Formative indicators: introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Research 61(12): 1201-1202.
35. Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA. 2006. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management 17(4): 263-282.
36. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal 21(10): 1105-1121.
37. Eisenhardt KM, Sull DN. 2001.Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Business Review 79(1): 107-116.
38. Garrett RP, Covin JG, Slevin DP. 2009. Market responsiveness, top management risk taking, and the role of strategic learning as determinants of market pioneering. Journal of Business Research 62(8): 782-788.
39. Garvin DA. 1993. Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review 71(4): 78-91.
40. Gibson C, Birkinshaw J. 2004. The antecedents, consequences and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal 47(2): 209-266.
41. Gilbert CG. 2006. Change in the presence of residual fit: can competing frames coexist? Organization Science 17(1): 150-167.
42. Grant R. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Winter Special Issue 17: 109-122.
43. Green KM, Covin JF, Slevin DP. 2008. Exploring the relationship between strategic reactiveness and entrepreneurial orientation: the role of structure-style fit. Journal of Business Venturing 23(3): 356-389.
44. Greve H. 2007. Exploration and exploitation in product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 16(5): 945-975.
45. Gupta AK, Govindarajan V. 1984. Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Academy of Management Journal 27(1): 25-41.
46. Hamel G. 2009. Moon shots for management. Harvard Business Review 87(2): 91-98.
47. Harman HH. 1976. Modern Factor Analysis (3rd edn). University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.
48. He Z, Wong P. 2004. Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science 15(4): 481-494.
49. Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Camp SM, Sexton DL. 2001. Strategic entrepreneurship: strategies for wealth creation. Strategic Management Journal 22(6/7): 479-491.
50. Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Sirmon DG, Trahms C. 2011. Strategic entrepreneurship: creating value for individuals, organizations, and society. Academy of Management Perspectives 25(2): 57-75.
51. Holmqvist M. 2004. Experiential learning processes of exploitation and exploration within and between organizations: an empirical study of product development. Organization Science 15(1): 70-81.
52. Huber GP. 1991. Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science 2(1): 88-115.
53. Ireland RD, Hitt MA, Sirmon DG. 2003. A model of strategic entrepreneurship: the construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management 29(6): 963-989.
54. Iverson RD, Maguire C. 2000. The relationship between job and life satisfaction: evidence from a remote mining community. Human Relations 53(6): 807-839.
55. James LR, Brett JM. 1984. Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology 69: 307-321.
56. James LR, Mulaik SA, Brett JM. 2006. A tale of two methods. Organizational Research Methods 9(2): 233-244.
57. Jansen JJ, Tempelaar MP, van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW. 2009. Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: the mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science 20(4): 797-811.
58. Jansen JJ, van den Bosch FA, Volberda HW. 2006. Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science 52(11): 1661-1674.
59. Jerez-Gómez P, Céspedes-Lorente J, Valle-Cabrera R. 2005. Organizational learning capability: a proposal of measurement. Journal of Business Research 58(6): 715-725.
60. Katila RA, Ahuja G. 2002. Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 45(6): 1183-1194.
61. Kautonen T, Zolin R, Kuckertz A, Viljamaa A. 2010. Ties that blind? How strong ties affect small business owner-managers' perceived trustworthiness of their advisors. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 22(2): 189-209.
62. Kenny DA, Kashy DA, Bolger N. 1998. Data analysis in social psychology. In Handbook of Social Psychology Gilbert D, Fiske S, Lindzey G (eds). McGraw-Hill: Boston, MA; 233-265.
63. Kohtamäki M, Kautonen T, Kraus S. 2010. Strategic planning and small business performance: an examination of the mediating role of exploration and exploitation behaviours. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation 11(3): 221-229.
64. Korsgaard AM, Roberson L. 1995. Procedural justice in performance evaluation: the role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management 21(4): 657-669.
65. Kuratko DF, Audretsch DB. 2009. Strategic entrepreneurship: exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33(1): 1-17.
66. Kuwada K. 1998. Strategic learning: the continuous side of discontinuous strategic change. Organizational Science 9(6): 719-736.
67. Kyrgidou LP, Hughes M. 2009. Strategic entrepreneurship: origins, core elements, and research directions. European Business Review 22(1): 43-63.
68. Law KS, Wong C-S, Mobley WH. 1998.Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. The Academy of Management Review 23(4): 741-755.
69. Leonard-Barton D. 1992. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue 13: 111-125.
70. Levinthal DA, March JG. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal 14(4): 95-112.
71. Levitt B, March JG. 1988. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14(3): 319-340.
72. Lichtenthaler U. 2009. Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal 52(4): 822-846.
73. Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, Widaman KF. 2002. To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling 9(2): 151-173.
74. Lohmöller J. 1989. Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Physica: Heidelberg, Germany.
75. Lubatkin MH, Simsek Z, Ling Y, Veiga JF. 2006. Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: the pivotal role of top management behavioral integration. Journal of Management 32(5): 646-672.
76. Lumpkin GT, Dess GG. 1996. Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review 21(1): 135-172.
77. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variables effects. Psychological Methods 7(1): 83-104.
78. March JG. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1): 71-87.
79. McFarlin DB, Sweeney PD. 1992. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 35(3): 626-637.
80. McGrath RG. 2001. Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal 44(1): 118-131.
81. Miles RH, Snow CC. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. McGraw-Hill: New York.
82. Mintzberg H, Lampel J. 1999. Reflecting on the strategy process. Sloan Management Review 40(3): 21-30.
83. Mintzberg H, Waters JA. 1985. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal 6(3): 257-272.
84. Mitchell RK, Mitchell JR, Smith JB. 2008. Inside opportunity formation: enterprise failure, cognition, and the creation of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 2(3): 225-242.
85. Moorman C, Miner AS. 1997. The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research 34(1): 91-106.
86. Murphy GB, Callaway SK. 2004. Doing well and happy about it? Explaining variance in entrepreneurs' stated satisfaction with performance. New England Journal of Entrepreneurship 7(2): 15-26.
87. Murphy GB, Trailer JW, Hill RC. 1996. Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Research 36(1): 15-23.
88. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242-266.
89. Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. 1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press: New York.
90. Nunnally J. 1978. Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill: New York.
91. O'Reilly CA III, Tushman ML. 2008. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior 28: 185-206.
92. Peterson RA. 1994. A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Journal of Consumer Research 21(2): 381-391.
93. Pietersen W. 2002. Reinventing Strategy: Using Strategic Learning to Create and Sustain Breakthrough Performance. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
94. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5): 879-903.
95. Podsakoff PM, Organ DW. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12(4): 531-544.
96. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. 2007. Focus on research methods: is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health 30(4): 459-467.
97. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J. 2008. Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management 34(3): 375-409.
98. Raisch S, Birkinshaw J, Probst G, Tushman ML. 2009. Organizational ambidexterity: balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science 20(4): 685-695.
99. Richardson HA, Simmering MJ, Sturman MC. 2009. A tale of three perspectives: examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Organizational Research Methods 12(4): 762-800.
100. Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A. 2005. SmartPLS 2.0. University of Hamburg: Hamburg, Germany.
101. Rothaermel FT, Alexandre MT. 2009. Ambidexterity in technology sourcing: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Organization Science 20(4): 759-780.
102. Schneider B, Ehrhart MG, Mayer DM, Saltz JL, Niles-Jolly K. 2005. Understanding organization-customer links in service settings. Academy of Management Journal 48(6): 1017-1032.
103. Simsek Z, Heavey C, Veiga JF, Souder D. 2009. A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's dimension, antecedents, and performance outcomes. Journal of Management Studies 46(5): 864-894.
104. Sinkula J, Baker WE, Noordewier T. 1997. A framework for market-based organizational learning: linking values, knowledge, and behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25(4): 305-318.
105. Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland, RD. 2007. Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review 32(1): 273-292.
106. Slater SF, Narver JC. 1995. Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing 59(3): 63-74.
107. Stam W, Elfring T. 2008. Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: the moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal 51(1): 97-111.
108. Steensma KH. 1996. Acquiring technological competencies through inter-organizational collaboration: an organizational learning perspective. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 12(4): 267-286.
109. Teece DJ. 2007. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal 28(13): 1319-1350.
110. Thomas JB, Sussman SW, Henderson JC. 2001. Understanding 'strategic learning:' linking organizational learning, knowledge management, and sensemaking. Organizational Science 12(3): 331-345.
111. Tippins MJ, Sohi RS. 2003. IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal 24(8): 745-761.
112. Tushman ML, O'Reilly CA. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38(4): 8-30.
113. Uotila J, Maula M, Keil T, Zahra S. 2009. Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal 30(2): 221-231.
114. Venkatraman N, Lee CH, Iyer B. 2007. Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: a longitudinal test in the software sector. Working paper, Boston University. Available at: http://www.softwareecosystems.com/SMJManuscript_revised.pdf (accessed 12 October 2010).
115. Verona G, Ravasi D. 2003. Unbundling dynamic capabilities: an exploratory study of continuous product innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 12(3): 577-606.
116. Volberda H. 1996. Toward the flexible form: how to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science 7(4): 359-374.
117. Voronov M, Yorks L. 2005. Taking power seriously in strategic organizational learning. The Learning Organization 12(1): 9-25.
118. Walsh JP, Ungson GR. 1991. Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review 16(1): 57-91.
119. Wang CL. 2008. Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 32(4): 635-657.
120. Werner S, Praxedes M, Kim H-G. 2007. The reporting of nonresponse analyses in survey research. Organizational Research Methods 10(2): 287-295.
121. Wernerfelt B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180.
122. Wu J, Shanley MT. 2009. Knowledge stock, exploration, and innovation: research on the United States electromedical device industry. Journal of Business Research 62(4): 474-483.
123. Yang B, Watkins KE, Marsick VJ. 2004. The construct of the learning organization: dimensions, measurement, and validation. Human Resource Development Quarterly 15(1): 31-55.
124. Ylitalo J. 2009. Controlling for common method variance with partial least squares path modeling: a Monte Carlo study. Research project, Helsinki University of Technology.
125. Zack M. 2002. Developing a knowledge strategy. In The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge Choo C, Bontis N (eds). Oxford University Press: New York; 255-276.
126. Zahra SA, George G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27(2): 185-203.