Bone remodeling after total hip arthroplasty with a short stemmed metaphyseal loading implant: Finite element analysis validated by a prospective DEXA investigation

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1822-1829

  Lerch, Matthias ^a   Kurtz, Agnes ^a   Stukenborg Colsman, Christina ^a   Nolte, Ingo ^b   Weigel, Nelly ^c   Bouguecha, Anas ^c   Behrens, Bernd A ^c  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE HANNOVER   (Germany)

^c LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

bone remodeling; dual energy X ray absorptiometry; finite element analysis; short stemmed implant; total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE MASS; BONE REMODELING; CEMENTLESS PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GREATER TROCHANTER; HUMAN; MALE; METAPHYSIS; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE REMODELING; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84867231759     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22120     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M., 2000. A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82: 952-958.
2. Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B., 1992. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 274: 124-134.
3. Falez F, Casella F, Panegrossi G, et al. 2008. Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems. J Orthop Traumatol 9: 49-54.
4. Albanese CV, Rendine M, De Palma F, et al. 2006. Bone remodelling in THA: a comparative DXA scan study between conventional implants and a new stemless femoral component. A preliminary report. Hip Int 16: 9-15.
5. Panisello JJ, Herrero L, Herrera A, et al. 2006. Bone remodelling after total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented anatomic femoral stem: a three-year prospective study using bone densitometry. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 14: 32-37.
6. Brodner W, Bitzan P, Lomoschitz F, et al. 2004. Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86: 20-26.
7. Braun A, Lazovic D, Zigan R., 2007. Modular short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implant positioning and the influence of navigation. Orthopedics 30: 148-152.
8. Synder M, Drobniewski M, Pruszczynski B, et al. 2009. Initial experience with short Metha stem implantation. 4. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 11: 317-323.
9. Lerch M, von der Haar-Tran A, Windhagen H, et al. 2011. Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study. Int Orthop 36: 533-538.
10. Behrens BA, Nolte I, Wefstaedt P, et al. 2009. Numerical investigations on the strain-adaptive bone remodelling in the periprosthetic femur: influence of the boundary conditions. Biomed Eng Online 8: 7.
11. Rho JY, Hobatho MC, Ashman RB., 1995. Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. Med Eng Phys 17: 347-355.
12. Speirs AD, Heller MO, Duda GN, et al. 2007. Physiologically based boundary conditions in finite element modelling. J Biomech 40: 2318-2323.
13. Morlock M, Schneider E, Bluhm A, et al. 2001. Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients. J Biomech 34: 873-881.
14. Bitsakos C, Kerner J, Fisher I, et al. 2005. The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur. J Biomech 38: 133-139.
15. Duda GN, Heller M, Albinger J, et al. 1998. Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution. J Biomech 31: 841-846.
16. Heller MO, Bergmann G, Kassi JP, et al. 2005. Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing. J Biomech 38: 1155-1163.
17. Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, et al. 2001. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech 34: 859-871.
18. Duda GN, Schneider E, Chao EY., 1997. Internal forces and moments in the femur during walking. J Biomech 30: 933-941.
19. Behrens BA, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Nolte I, et al. 2009. Femoral load change and caused bone remodeling after hip arthroplasty. In:, Dössel O, Schlegel WC, editors. World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, 7-12 September, 2009. Munich, Germany: Image Processing, Biosignal Processing, Modelling and Simulation; Biomechanics. 25/IV ed. Springer.
20. Speirs AD, Heller MO, Taylor WR, et al. 2007. Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22: 431-439.
21. Roth A, Richartz G, Sander K, et al. 2005. Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration. Orthopade 34: 334-344.
22. Martini F, Lebherz C, Mayer F, et al. 2000. Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82: 1065-1071.
23. Mortimer ES, Rosenthall L, Paterson I, et al. 1996. Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom. Clin Orthop Relat Res 324: 269-274.
24. Lengsfeld M, Gunther D, Pressel T, et al. 2002. Validation data for periprosthetic bone remodelling theories. J Biomech 35: 1553-1564.
25. Aldinger PR, Sabo D, Pritsch M, et al. 2003. Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 73: 115-121.
26. Boden HS, Skoldenberg OG, Salemyr MO, et al. 2006. Continuous bone loss around a tapered uncemented femoral stem: a long-term evaluation with DEXA. Acta Orthop 77: 877-885.
27. Chen HH, Morrey BF, An KN, et al. 2009. Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 24: 945-950.
28. Fottner A, Schmid M, Birkenmaier C, et al. 2009. Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotions. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24: 429-434.
29. Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, et al. 1994. Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76: 912-917.
30. Tai CL, Shih CH, Chen WP, et al. 2003. Finite element analysis of the cervico-trochanteric stemless femoral prosthesis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18: S53-S58.
31. Taylor WR, Ploeg H, Hertig D, et al. 2004. Bone remodelling of a proximal femur with the thrust plate prosthesis: an in vitro case. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 7: 131-137.
32. Tanzer M, Kantor S, Rosenthall L, et al. 2001. Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 16: 552-558.
33. Puthumanapully PK, Browne M., 2011. Tissue differentiation around a short stemmed metaphyseal loading implant employing a modified mechanoregulatory algorithm: a finite element study. J Orthop Res 29: 787-794.
34. Fernandes PR, Folgado J, Jacobs C, et al. 2002. A contact model with ingrowth control for bone remodelling around cementless stems. J Biomech 35: 167-176.