Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 533-538

  Lerch, Matthias ^a   Von Der Haar Tran, Annelene ^a   Windhagen, Henning ^a   Behrens, Bernd A ^b   Wefstaedt, Patrick ^c   Stukenborg Colsman, Christina M ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GREATER TROCHANTER; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; LESSER TROCHANTER; LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY; MALE; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOLYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; X RAY ANALYSIS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE DENSITY; FEMALE; FEMUR; HEALTH STATUS; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; QUALITY OF LIFE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84859159994     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1361-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M (2000) A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:952-8
2. Huiskes R, Weinans H, van RB (1992) The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res 124-34.
3. Falez F, Casella F, Panegrossi G et al (2008) Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems. J Orthop Traumatol 9:49-54
4. Brodner W, Bitzan P, Lomoschitz F et al (2004) Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:20-6 (Pubitemid 38128699)
5. Sabo D, Reiter A, Simank HG et al (1998) Periprosthetic mineralization around cementless total hip endoprosthesis: longitudinal study and cross-sectional study on titanium threaded acetabular cup and cementless Spotorno stem with DEXA. Calcif Tissue Int 62:177-82
6. Speirs AD, Heller MO, Taylor WR et al (2007) Influence of changes in stem positioning on femoral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon ) 22:431-9 (Pubitemid 46498364)
7. Cohen B, Rushton N (1995) Accuracy of DEXA measurement of bone mineral density after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:479-83
8. Martini F, Lebherz C, Mayer F et al (2000) Precision of the measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density in hips with a custom-made femoral stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1065-71
9. Mortimer ES, Rosenthall L, Paterson I, Bobyn JD (1996) Effect of rotation on periprosthetic bone mineral measurements in a hip phantom. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269-74. (Pubitemid 26071776)
10. Albanese CV, Rendine M, De PF et al (2006) Bone remodelling in THA: A comparative DXA scan study between conventional implants and a new stemless femoral component. A preliminary report. Hip Int 16(Suppl 3):9-15
11. Panisello JJ, Herrero L, Herrera A et al (2006) Bone remodelling after total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented anatomic femoral stem: a three-year prospective study using bone densitometry. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong ) 14:32-7
12. Aldinger PR, Sabo D, Pritsch M et al (2003) Pattern of periprosthetic bone remodeling around stable uncemented tapered hip stems: a prospective 84-month follow-up study and a median 156-month cross-sectional study with DXA. Calcif Tissue Int 73:115-21 (Pubitemid 37082357)
13. Korovessis P, Droutsas P, Piperos G et al (1997) Course of bone mineral content changes around cementless Zweymueller total hip arthroplasty. A 4-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116:60-5
14. Skoldenberg OG, Boden HS, SalemyrMO et al (2006) Periprosthetic proximal bone loss after uncemented hip arthroplasty is related to stem size: DXA measurements in 138 patients followed for 2-7 years. Acta Orthop 77:386-92
15. Mulier M, Jaecques SV, Raaijmaakers M et al (2011) Early periprosthetic bone remodelling around cemented and uncemented custom-made femoral components and their uncemented acetabular cups. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:941-8
16. Pitto RP, Hayward A, Walker C, Shim VB (2010) Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taperdesign stem: a five year follow-up study. Int Orthop 34:783-7
17. Rahmy AI, Gosens T, Blake GM et al (2004) Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss. Osteoporos Int 15:281-9 (Pubitemid 38543946)
18. Braun A, Lazovic D, Zigan R (2007) Modular short-stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty: implant positioning and the influence of navigation. Orthopedics 30:148-52
19. Katano H (2007) Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density in Bicontact SD Stem. Five to Ten Years Follwo-up. In: Weller S, Braun A, Eingartner C, Maurer F, Weise K, Winter E, Volkmann R (eds) The Bicontact Hip Arthroplasty System 1987-2007. Tübingen, Georg Thieme Verlag, pp 63-69
20. Thorey F, Lerch M, Klages P, et al. (2010) Ist eine metaphysäre Verankerung durch neue Kurzschaftsysteme realisierbar? Welche Potentiale verbergen sich hinter diesen Designkonzepten für unseren Klinikalltag? 58 Jahrestagung der Vereinigung Süddeutscher Orthopäden e V Poster No. 48:
21. Albanese CV, Santori FS, Pavan L et al (2009) Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs. ultra-short custommade femoral stems: 37 patients followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop 80:291-7
22. Decking R, Puhl W, Simon U, Claes LE (2006) Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon ) 21:495-501 (Pubitemid 44389484)
23. Sychterz CJ, Topoleski LD, Sacco M, Engh CA, Sr. (2001) Effect of femoral stiffness on bone remodeling after uncemented arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 218-27. (Pubitemid 32729660)
24. Tanzer M, Kantor S, Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD (2001) Femoral remodeling after porous-coated total hip arthroplasty with and without hydroxyapatite- tricalcium phosphate coating: a prospective randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 16:552-8 (Pubitemid 32754866)
25. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, et al. (1992) Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 79-96.
26. Munting E, Smitz P, Van SN et al (1997) Effect of a stemless femoral implant for total hip arthroplasty on the bone mineral density of the proximal femur. A prospective longitudinal study. J Arthroplasty 12:373-9 (Pubitemid 29023759)