Numerical investigations on the strain-adaptive bone remodelling in the periprosthetic femur: Influence of the boundary conditions

BioMedical Engineering Online

Volumn 8, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Behrens, Bernd Arno ^a   Nolte, Ingo ^b   Wefstaedt, Patrick ^b   Stukenborg Colsman, Christina ^c   Bouguecha, Anas ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VETERINARY MEDICINE HANNOVER   (Germany)

^c HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPARENT BONE DENSITY; BONE ADAPTATION; BONE REMODELLING; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; FE CALCULATIONS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GAIT CYCLES; LOADING REGIMES; MASS LOSS; NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS; NUMERICAL STUDIES; PHYSIOLOGICAL LOADS; SIMULATION RESULT; STATIC LOADING; STATIC LOADS; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; LOADING; NUMERICAL METHODS;

BONE;

TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE MASS; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GAIT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MUSCLE FORCE; PHYSICAL STRESS; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WEIGHT BEARING; YOUNG MODULUS; ADAPTATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELASTIC MODULUS; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 65649147588     PISSN: 1475925X     EISSN: 1475925X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-8-7     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adam F Kohn D Computergestützte Entwicklung eines anatomischen Hüftprothesenschaftes Magazin Forschung 2000, 1:41-48.
2. Behrens B-A Wirt CJ Windhagen H Nolte I Meyer-Lindenberg A Bouguecha A Numerical investigations of stress shielding in total hip prostheses J Engineering in Medicine 2008, 222:593-600. 10.1243/09544119JEIM139
3. Wolff J Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. 1892 Berlin, Hirschwald
4. Sumner DR Galante JO Determinants of Stress Shielding Clinical Orthopaedics and related Research 1992, 274:203-212.
5. Bouguecha A Nolte I Pressel T Stukenborg C Behrens B-A Numerische Berechnung des beanspruchungsadaptiven Knochenumbaus im periprothetischen Femur. 41 Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Biomedizinische Technik im VDE BMT2007, Aachen 2007
6. Bitsakos C Kerner J Fischer I Amis AA The effect of muscle loading on the simulation of bone remodelling in the proximal femur J Biomech 2005, 38:133-139. 15519348
7. Engh CA Amis AA Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling J Biomechanics 1999, 32:695-703. 10.1016/ S0021-9290(99)00041-X
8. Fernandes PR Folgado J Jacobs C Pellegrini V A contact model with ingrowth control for bone remodelling around cementless stems J Biomechanics 2002, 35:167-176. 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00204-4
9. Huiskes R van Rietbergen B Preclinical Testing of Total Hip Stems Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995, 319:64-76. 7554651
10. Kuiper JH Huiskes R The predictive value of stress shielding for quantification of adaptive bone resorption around hip replacements J Biomech Eng 1997, 119(3):228-231. 10.1115/1.2796084 9285333
11. Taylor WR Ploeg H Hertig D Warner MD Clift SE Bone Remodelling of a proximal femur with the thrust plate prosthesis: An in vitro case Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2004, 7(3):131-137. 10.1080/ 10255840410001712108 15512756
12. Turner AW Gillies RM Sekel R Morris P Bruce W Walsh WR Computational bone remodelling simulations and comparisons with DEXA results J Orthopaedic Research 2005, 23:705-712. 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.02.002
13. Weinans H Huiskes R van Rietbergen B The Relationship between Stress Shielding and Bone Resorption Around Total Hip Stems and the Effects of Flexible Materials J Orthopaedic Research 1992, 10:845-853. 10.1002/ jor.1100100614
14. Ang KC De SD Goh JCH Low SL Bose K Periprosthetic bone remodelling after cementless total hip replacement J Bone & Joint Surgery 1997, 79-B(4):675-679. 10.1302/0301-620X.79B4.7410
15. Nygaard M Zerahn B Bruce C Soballe K Borgwardt A Early periprosthetic femoral bone remodelling using different bearing material combinations in total hip arthroplasties: A prospective randomised study Eur Cell Mater 2004, 8:65-72. 15647996
16. Morlock M Schneider E Bluhm A Vollmer M Bergmann G Müller V Honl M Duration and frequency of every day activities in total hip patients J Biomechanics 2001, 34:873-881. 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00035-5
17. Ebbecke B Nackenhorst U Simulation of stress adaptive bone remodelling J Structural Mechanics 2005, 38:177-180.
18. Nackenhorst U Numerical simulation of stress stimulated bone remodelling Technische Mechanik 1997, 17:31-40.
19. Tai CL Shih CH Chen WP Lee SS Liu YL Hsieh PH Finite element analysis of the cervico-trochanteric stemless femoral prosthesis Clinical Biomechanics. (Bristol, Avon) 2003, 18:S53-S58. 10.1016/ S0268-0033(03)00085-8 12828915
20. Speirs AD Heller MO Duda GN Taylor WR Physiologically based boundary conditions in finite element modelling J Biomechanics 2007, 40:2318-2323. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.10.038
21. Rho JY Hobatho MC Ashman RB Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone Medical Engineering and Physics 1995, 17:347-355. 10.1016/1350-4533(95)97314-F
22. Carter DR Hayas WC The compressive behaviour of bone as a two-phase porous structure J Bone Joint Surg Am 1977, 59(7):954-962. 561786
23. Reiter TJ Böhm HJ Krach W Rammerstorfer FG Some applications of the finite-element method in biomechanical stress analyses International J Computer Application in Technology 1994 7 3-6 233 241
24. Duda GN Heller M Albinger J Schulz O Schneider E Claes L Influence of muscle forces on femoral strain distribution J Biomechanics 1998, 31:841-846. 10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00080-3
25. Polgár K Gill HS Viceconti M Murray DW O'Connor JJ Strain distribution within the human femur due to physiological and simplified loading: Finite element analysis using the muscle standardized femur model J Engineering in Medicine 2003, 217:173-189. 10.1243/ 095441103765212677
26. Viceconti M Ansaloni M Baleani M Toni A The muscle standardized femur: A step forward in the replication of numerical studies in biomechanics J Engineering in Medicine 2003, 217:105-110. 10.1243/09544110360579312
27. Heller MO Bergmann G Kassi J-P Claes L Haas NP Duda GN Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing J Biomechanics 2005, 38:1155-1163. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.022
28. Bergmann G Deuretbacher G Heller M Graichen F Rohlmann A Strauss J Duda GN Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities J Biomechanics 2001, 34:859-871. 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00040-9
29. Duda GN Schneider E Chao EYS Internal forces and moments in the femur during walking J Biomechanics 1997, 30:933-941. 10.1016/ S0021-9290(97)00057-2
30. Carter DR Fyhrie DP Whalen RT Trabecular bone density and loading history: Regulation of connective tissue biology by mechanical energy J Biomechanics 1987, 20:785-794. 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90058-3
31. Goetzen N Lampe F Nassut R Morlock MM Load-shift-numerical evaluation of a new design philosophy for uncemented hip prostheses J Biomechanics 2005, 38:595-604. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.01.023
32. Fritz ST Volkmann R Winter E Bretschneider C The BICONTACT hip endoprosthesis- a universal system for hip arthroplasty for traumatic and idiopathic indications results after 10 years European J Trauma, E-Supplement 2001, 1:18-22.
33. Lengsfeld M Günther D Pressel T Leppek R Schmitt J Griss P Validation data for periprosthetic bone remodelling theories J Biomechanics 2002, 35:1553-1564. 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00187-2