Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis : DDependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration;Verlauf der periprothetischen knochendichte nach hü fttotalendoprothesenimplantation: Abhängigkeit von prothesentyp und knöcherner ausgangssituation

Orthopade

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 334-344

  Roth, A ^a   Richartz, G ^b   Sander, K ^a   Sachse, A ^a   Fuhrmann, R ^a   Wagner, A ^a   Venbrocks, R A ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b Abteilung für Innere Medizin   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

DEXA; Hip endoprosthesis; Periprosthetic bone density

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; COBALT; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; ATROPHY; BONE DENSITY; BONE MARROW; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; HYPERTROPHY; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERIAL COATING; OSTEOLYSIS; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE RESORPTION; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 19344366964     PISSN: 00854530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00132-005-0773-1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adler E, Stuchin SA, Kummer FJ (1992) Stability of press-fit acetabular cups. J Arthroplasty 7: 295-301
2. Arabmotlagh M, Hennigs T, Rittmeister M (2003) Periprothetischer Knochenumbau am proximalen Femur nach Implantation von Individual- und Standard-Hüftendoprothesen. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141:519-525
3. Barnett E, Nordin (1960) The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 11: 166-174
4. Bobyn JD, Glassman AH, Goto H, Krygier JJ, Miller JE, Brooks CE (1990) The effect of stem stiffness on femoral bone resorption after canine porous-coated total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 261: 196-213
5. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, Engh CA, Miller JE, Brooks CE (1992) Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 274: 79-96
6. Bryan JM, Sumner DR, Hurwitz DE, Tompkins GS, Andriacchi TP, Galante JO (1996) Altered load history affects periprosthetic bone loss following cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 14: 762-768
7. Bugbee WD, Culpepper WJ, Engh CA Jr, Engh CA Sr (1997) Long-term clinical consequenses of stress-shielding after total hip arthroplasty without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79: 1007-1012
8. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in hip replacement. Clin Orthop 121: 20-33
9. Engh CA, Bobyn JD (1988) The influence of stem size and extent of porous coating on femoral bone resorption after primary cementless hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 231: 7-28
10. Engh CA, Hooten JP Jr, Zettl-Schaffer KF, Ghaffarpour M, McGovern TF, Macalino GE, Zicat BA (1994) Porous-coated total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 298: 89-96
11. Engh CA, McGovern TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH (1992) A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone-remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74: 1009-1020
12. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components. Clin Orthop 141: 17-27
13. Hennigs T, Arabmotlagh M, Schwarz A, Zichner L (2002) Dose-dependent prevention of early periprosthetic bone loss by alendronate. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 140: 42-47
14. Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B (1992) The Relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop 274: 124-134
15. Ingle BM, Hay SM, Bottjer HM, Eastell R (1999) Changes in bone mass and bone turnover following ankle fracture. Osteoporos Int 10: 408-415
16. Kinner B, Willmann G, Storz S, Kinner J (1999) Erfahrungen mit einer Hydroxylapatit-beschichteten, makroporös strukturierten Hüftendoprothese. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 137: 114-121
17. Kröger H, Venesmaa P, Jurvelin J, Miettinen H, Suomalainen O, Alhava E (1998) Bone density at the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 352: 66-74
18. Kummer B (1998) Grundlagen der Pauwels, Theorie der funktionellen Anpassung des Knochens. Orthopäde 24: 387-393
19. McAuley JP, Culpepper WJ, Engh CA (1998) Total Hip Arthroplasty. Concerns with extensively porous coated femoral components. Clin Orthop 355: 182-188
20. McAuley JP, Moore KD, Culpepper WJ, Engh CA (1998) Total hip arthroplasty with porous-coated prostheses fixed without cement in patients who are sixty-five years of age or older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80: 1648-1655
21. McAuley JP, Sychterz CJ, Engh CA Sr (2000) Influence of porous coating level on proximal femoral remodeling. Clin Orthop 37: 146-153
22. Morrey BF (1998) A femoral component for hip replacement. Orthopedics 21: 1011-1012
23. Morscher E (1994) Prinzipien der Pfannenfixation bei der Hüftarthroplastik mit spezieller Berücksichtigung des Press-Fit Cup. Med Orthop Tech 114: 217-222
24. Nishii T, Sugano N, Masuhara K, Shibuya T, Ochi T, Tamura S (1997) Longitudinal evaluation of time related bone remodeling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 339: 121-131
25. Ohta H, Kobayashi S, Saito N, Nawata M, Horiuchi H, Takaoka K (2003) Sequential changes in periprosthetic bone mineral density following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Miner Metab 21: 229-233
26. Pritchett JW (1995) Femoral bone loss following hip replacement. Clin Orthop 314: 156-161
27. Reiter A, Gellrich JC, Bachmann J, Braun A (2003) Verlauf der periprothetischen Mineralisationsdichte nach Implantation des zementfreien Bicontact-Schaftes; Einfluss verschiedener Parameter - ein prospektives Follow up über 4 Jahre. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 141: 283-288
28. Reiter A, Sabo D, Simank HG, Buchner T, Seidel M, Lukoschek M (1997) Periprothetische Mineralisationsdichte zementfreier Hüftendoprothetik. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 135: 499-504
29. Richmond BJ, Eberle RW, Stulberg BN, Deal CL (1991) DEXA-measurement of periprosthetic bone mineral density in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Miner Res 6: 241-249
30. Rubash HE, Sinha RK, Shanbhag AS, Kim SY (1998) Pathogenesis of bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 29: 173-186
31. Sabo D, Reiter A, Simank HG, Thomson M, Lukoschek M, Ewerbeck V (1998) Periprosthetic mineralization around cementless total hip endoprosthesis: longitudinal study and cross-sectional study on titanium threaded acetabular cup and cementless Spotorno stem with DEXA. Calcif Tissue Int 62: 177-182
32. Spittlehouse AJ, Smith TW, Eastell R (1998) Bone loss around 2 different types of hip prostheses. J Arthroplasty 13: 422-427
33. Spotorno L, Schenk RK, Dietschi C, Romagnoli S, Mumenthaler A (1987) Unsere Erfahrungen mit nicht-zementierten Prothesen. Orthopäde 16: 225-238
34. Sychterz CJ, Topoleski LD, Sacco M, Engh CA Sr (2001) Effect of femoral stiffness on bone remodeling after uncemented arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 389: 218-227
35. Theis JC, Beadel G (2003) Changes in proximal femoral bone mineral density around a hydroxyapatite-coated hip joint arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg 11: 48-52
36. Trevistan C, Bigoni M, Randelli G, Marinoni EG, Peretti G, Ortolani S (1997) Periprosthetic bone density around fully hydroaptite coated femoral stem. Clin Orthop 340: 109-117
37. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B, Morscher EW (1997) Kontaktflache und Druckbelastung im Implantat-Knochen-Interface bei Press-Fit-Hüftpfannen im Vergleich zum natürlichen Hüftgelenk. Orthopäde 26: 181-189
38. Wixson RL, Stulberg SD, Van Flandern GJ, Puri L (1997) Maintenance of proximal bone mass with an uncemented femoral stem analysis with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Arthroplasty 12: 365-372
39. Wolf JH (1995) Julius Wolff und sein "Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen". Orthopäde 24: 378-386