Reliance: A mchine learning and literature-based prioritization of receptor-ligand pairings

Bioinformatics

Volumn 28, Issue 18, 2012, Pages

  Iacucci, Ernesto ^a   Tranchevent, Léon Charles ^a   Popovic, Dusan ^a   Pavlopoulos, Georgios A ^a   De Moor, Bart ^a   Schneider, Reinhard ^b   Moreau, Yves ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LUXEMBOURG   (Luxembourg)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL SURFACE RECEPTOR; LIGAND;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION; DATA MINING; DOG; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PROTEIN DATABASE; RAT;

ANIMALS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA MINING; DATABASES, PROTEIN; DOGS; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MICE; RATS; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE;

EID: 84867026120     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts391     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aerts,S. et al. (2005) TOUCAN 2: the all-inclusive open source workbench for regulatory sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, W393-W396.
2. Bader,G.D. et al. (2001) BIND-The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 242-245.
3. Booth,G. et al. (2008) Gene expression profiles at different stages of collagen-induced arthritis. Autoimmunity, 41, 512-521.
4. Dennis,G., Jr. et al. (2003) DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol., 4, 3.
5. Gavin,A.C. et al. (2002) Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature, 415, 141-147.
6. Gertz,J. et al. (2003) Inferring protein interactions from phylogenetic distance matrices. Bioinformatics, 19, 2039-2045.
7. Goel,R. et al. (2012) Human Protein Reference Database and Human Proteinpedia as resources for phosphoproteome analysis. Mol. Biosyst., 8, 453-463.
8. Graeber,T.G. and Eisenberg,D. (2001) Bioinformatic identification of potential autocrine signaling loops in cancers from gene expression profiles. Nat. Genet., 29, 295-300.
9. Hodges,P.E. et al. (1999) The Yeast Proteome Database (YPD): a model for the organization and presentation of genome-wide functional data. Nucleic Acids Res., 27, 69-73.
10. Hoffmann,R. and Valencia,A. (2004) A gene network for navigating the literature. Nat. Genet., 36, 664.
11. Hoglund,R.A. et al. (2011) Expression and functional activity of chemokine receptors in glatiramer acetate-specific T cells isolated from multiple sclerosis patient receiving the drug glatiramer acetate. Hum. Immunol., 72, 124-134.
12. Hubbard,T.J. et al. (2009) Ensembl 2009. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D690-D697.
13. Hunter,S. et al. (2009) InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, D211-D215.
14. Iacucci,E. et al. (2011) Predicting receptor-ligand pairs through kernel learning. BMC Bioinformatics, 12, 336.
15. Ito,T. et al. (2001) A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 4569-4574.
16. Kerrien,S. et al. (2007) IntAct-open source resource for molecular interaction data. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D561-D565.
17. Kuhn,M. et al. (2008) STITCH: interaction networks of chemicals and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D684-D688.
18. Laskowski,R.A. (2001) PDBsum: summaries and analyses of PDB structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 29, 221-222.
19. Letunic,I. et al. (2006) SMART 5: domains in the context of genomes and networks. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D257-D260.
20. Mewes,H.W. et al. (2004) MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D41-D44.
21. Overington,J.P. et al. (2006) How many drug targets are there? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 5, 993-996.
22. Pafilis,E. et al. (2009) Reflect: augmented browsing for the life scientist. Nat. Biotechnol., 27, 508-510.
23. Pavlopoulos,G.A. et al. (2009) OnTheFly: a tool for automated document-based text annotation, data linking and network generation. Bioinformatics, 25, 977-978.
24. Pavlopoulos,G.A. et al. (2011) Medusa: A tool for exploring and clustering biological networks. BMC Res. Notes, 4, 384.
25. Puig,O. et al. (2001) The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods, 24, 218-229.
26. Qi,Y. et al. (2005) Random forest similarity for protein-protein interaction prediction from multiple sources. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 2005, 531-542.
27. Stark,C. et al. (2006) BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D535-D539.
28. Stoll,D. et al. (2005) Protein microarrays: applications and future challenges. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev., 8, 239-252.
29. Su,A.I. et al. (2004) A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 101, 6062-6067.
30. Thompson,J.D. et al. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res., 22, 4673-4680.
31. Vikis,H.G. and Guan,K.L. (2004) Glutathione-S-transferase-fusion based assays for studying protein-protein interactions. Methods Mol. Biol., 261, 175-186.
32. Von Mering,C. et al. (2007) STRING 7-recent developments in the integration and prediction of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D358-D362.
33. Willats,W.G. (2002) Phage display: practicalities and prospects. Plant Mol. Biol., 50, 837-854.
34. Xenarios,I. et al. (2000) DIP: the database of interacting proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 289-291.
35. Xia,K. et al. (2006) IntNetDB v1.0: an integrated protein-protein interaction network database generated by a probabilistic model. BMC Bioinformatics, 7, 508.
36. Zanzoni,A. et al. (2002) MINT: a Molecular INTeraction database. FEBS Lett., 513, 135-140.