Development of Novel Visual-Plus Quantitative Analysis Systems for Studying DNA Double-Strand Break Repairs in Zebrafish

Journal of Genetics and Genomics

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 489-502

  Liu, Jingang ^a   Gong, Lu ^a   Chang, Changqing ^b   Liu, Cong ^c   Peng, Jinrong ^b   Chen, Jun ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

DNA DSB repair; HR; I Sce I; NHEJ; SSA; Zebrafish

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; ENHANCED GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; LIGASE; LIGASE 4; RAD51 PROTEIN; RAD52 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA REPAIR; DNA SEQUENCE; EMBRYO; IN VIVO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; SINGLE STRAND ANNEALING; WILD TYPE; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CHO CELLS; CRICETINAE; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; DNA HELICASES; DNA LIGASES; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; ZEBRAFISH;

DANIO RERIO; MAMMALIA;

EID: 84866850621     PISSN: 16738527     EISSN: 18735533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2012.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adams B.R., Hawkins A.J., Povirk L.F., Valerie K. ATM-independent, high-fidelity nonhomologous end joining predominates in human embryonic stem cells. Aging (Albany NY) 2010, 2:582-596.
2. Akyuz N., Boehden G.S., Susse S., Rimek A., Preuss U., Scheidtmann K.H., Wiesmuller L. DNA substrate dependence of p53-mediated regulation of double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002, 22:6306-6317.
3. Certo M.T., Ryu B.Y., Annis J.E., Garibov M., Jarjour J., Rawlings D.J., Scharenberg A.M. Tracking genome engineering outcome at individual DNA breakpoints. Nat. Methods 2011, 8:671-676.
4. Chen J., Ng S.M., Chang C., Zhang Z., Bourdon J.C., Lane D.P., Peng J. p53 isoform delta113p53 is a p53 target gene that antagonizes p53 apoptotic activity via BclxL activation in zebrafish. Genes Dev. 2009, 23:278-290.
5. Ciccia A., Elledge S.J. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:179-204.
6. Colleaux L., D'Auriol L., Galibert F., Dujon B. Recognition and cleavage site of the intron-encoded omega transposase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85:6022-6026.
7. Dudas A., Chovanec M. DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. Mutat. Res. 2004, 566:131-167.
8. Hagmann M., Adlkofer K., Pfeiffer P., Bruggmann R., Georgiev O., Schaffner D., Rungger W. Dramatic changes in the ratio of homologous recombination to nonhomologous DNA-end joining in oocytes and early embryos of Xenopus laevis. Biol. Chem. Hoppe Seyler 1996, 377:239-250.
9. Hagmann M., Bruggmann R., Xue L., Georgiev O., Schaffner W., Rungger D., Spaniol P., Gerster T. Homologous recombination and DNA-end joining reactions in zygotes and early embryos of zebrafish (Danio rerio) and Drosophila melanogaster. Biol. Chem. 1998, 379:673-681.
10. Hakem R. DNA-damage repair; the good, the bad, and the ugly. EMBO J. 2008, 27:589-605.
11. Hiom K. Coping with DNA double strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010, 9:1256-1263.
12. Ivanov E.L., Sugawara N., Fishman-Lobell J., Haber J.E. Genetic requirements for the single-strand annealing pathway of double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1996, 142:693-704.
13. Jasin M. Genetic manipulation of genomes with rare-cutting endonucleases. Trends Genet. 1996, 12:224-228.
14. Keimling M., Wiesmuller L. DNA double-strand break repair activities in mammary epithelial cells - influence of endogenous p53 variants. Carcinogenesis 2009, 30:1260-1268.
15. Lieber M.R., Ma Y., Pannicke U., Schwarz K. Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous DNA end-joining. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4:712-720.
16. Mills K.D., Ferguson D.O., Essers J., Eckersdorff M., Kanaar R., Alt F.W. Rad54 and DNA Ligase IV cooperate to maintain mammalian chromatid stability. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:1283-1292.
17. Orii K.E., Lee Y., Kondo N., McKinnon P.J. Selective utilization of nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination DNA repair pathways during nervous system development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:10017-10022.
18. Pierce A.J., Johnson R.D., Thompson L.H., Jasin M. XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 1999, 13:2633-2638.
19. Porter G., Westmoreland J., Priebe S., Resnick M.A. Homologous and homeologous intermolecular gene conversion are not differentially affected by mutations in the DNA damage or the mismatch repair genes RAD1, RAD50, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, PMS1 and MSH2. Genetics 1996, 143:755-767.
20. Sung P., Krejci L., Van K.S., Sehorn M.G. Rad51 recombinase and recombination mediators. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:42729-42732.
21. Thoms K.M., Kuschal C., Emmert S. Lessons learned from DNA repair defective syndromes. Exp. Dermatol. 2007, 16:532-544.
22. Tichy E.D., Pillai R., Deng L., Liang L., Tischfield J., Schwemberger S.J., Babcock G.F., Stambrook P.J. Mouse embryonic stem cells, but not somatic cells, predominantly use homologous recombination to repair double-strand DNA breaks. Stem Cells Dev. 2010, 19:1699-1711.
23. Tichy E.D., Stambrook P.J. DNA repair in murine embryonic stem cells and differentiated cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314:1929-1936.
24. Weinstock D.M., Nakanishi K., Helgadottir H.R., Jasin M. Assaying double-strand break repair pathway choice in mammalian cells using a targeted endonuclease or the RAG recombinase. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 409:524-540.
25. Weterings E., Chen D.J. The endless tale of non-homologous end-joining. Cell Res. 2008, 18:114-124.
26. Wilson J.H., Berget P.B., Pipas J.M. Somatic cells efficiently join unrelated DNA segments end-to-end. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1982, 2:1258-1269.