ATM-independent, high-fidelity nonhomologous end joining predominates in human embryonic stem cells

Aging

Volumn 2, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 582-596

  Adams, Bret R ^a   Hawkins, Amy J ^a   Povirk, Lawrence F ^a,b   Valerie, Kristoffer ^a,b  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

BG01V; DSB repair; KU 55933; KU 57788; KU 59436

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DNA; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; NHEJ1 PROTEIN, HUMAN; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSYLTRANSFERASE; POLYDEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDE SYNTHASE; PROTEIN KINASE C; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN; XRCC4 PROTEIN, HUMAN;

ARTICLE; ASTROCYTE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CYTOLOGY; DNA REPAIR; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; HUMAN; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ASTROCYTES; BASE SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELLS, CULTURED; DNA; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPAIR ENZYMES; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; POLY(ADP-RIBOSE) POLYMERASES; PROTEIN KINASE C; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS;

EID: 79952114962     PISSN: 19454589     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18632/aging.100197     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Cervantes RB et al. Embryonic stem cells and somatic cells differ in mutation frequency and type. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99:3586-3590.
2. Hong Y et al. Protecting genomic integrity in somatic cells and embryonic stem cells. Mutat Res, 2007; 614:48-55.
3. Hong Y and Stambrook PJ. Restoration of an absent G1 arrest and protection from apoptosis in embryonic stem cells after ionizing radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004; 101:14443-14448.
4. Maynard S et al. Human Embryonic Stem Cells have Enhanced Repair of Multiple Forms of DNA Damage. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 2266-2274.
5. Adams BR et al. Dynamic dependence on ATR and ATM for double-strand break repair in human embryonic stem cells and neural descendants. PLoS One. 2010; 5: e10001.
6. Valerie K and Povirk LF. Regulation and mechanisms of mammalian double-strand break repair. Oncogene. 2003; 22: 5792-5812.
7. Povirk LF. End-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair (invited review) Rec Dev Res Cancer. 2002; 4:117-138.
8. Golding SE et al. Pro-survival AKT and ERK signaling from EGFR and mutant EGFRvIII enhances DNA double-strand break repair in human glioma cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2009; 8:730-738.
9. Wang M et al. PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34: 6170-6182.
10. Audebert, M., B. Salles, and P. Calsou, Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA ligase III in an alternative route for DNA double-strand breaks rejoining. J Biol Chem, 2004; 279:55117-55126.
11. Difilippantonio MJ et al. DNA repair protein Ku80 suppresses chromosomal aberrations and malignant transformation. Nature. 2000; 404:510-514.
12. Gao Y et al. Interplay of p53 and DNA-repair protein XRCC4 in tumorigenesis, genomic stability and development. Nature. 2000; 404:897-900.
13. Perrault R et al. Backup pathways of NHEJ are suppressed by DNA-PK. J Cell Biochem. 2004; 92:781-794.
14. Kabotyanski EB et al. Double-strand break repair in Ku86- and XRCC4-deficient cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998; 26:5333-5342.
15. DiBiase SJ, et al. DNA-dependent protein kinase stimulates an independently active, nonhomologous, end-joining apparatus. Cancer Res. 2000; 60:1245-1253.
16. Lee JW et al. Implication of DNA polymerase lambda in alignment-based gap filling for nonhomologous DNA end joining in human nuclear extracts. J Biol Chem. 2004; 279:805-811.
17. Nick McElhinny SA et al. A gradient of template dependence defines distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining. Mol Cell. 2005; 19:357-366.
18. Lindahl T et al. Post-translational modification of poly(ADPribose) polymerase induced by DNA strand breaks. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995; 20:405-411.
19. Menisser-de Murcia J et al. Early embryonic lethality in PARP-1 Atm double-mutant mice suggests a functional synergy in cell proliferation during development. Mol Cell Biol. 2001; 21:1828-1832.
20. Bryant HE and Helleday T. Inhibition of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase activates ATM which is required for subsequent homologous recombination repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006; 34:1685-1691.
21. Orii KE et al. Selective utilization of nonhomologous endjoining and homologous recombination DNA repair pathways during nervous system development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006; 103:10017-10022.
22. Essers J et al. Homologous and non-homologous recombination differentially affect DNA damage repair in mice. Embo J. 2000; 19:1703-1170.
23. Biton S et al. ATM-mediated response to DNA double strand breaks in human neurons derived from stem cells. DNA Repair (Amst). 2007; 6:128-134.
24. Banuelos CA et al. Mouse but not human embryonic stem cells are deficient in rejoining of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst). 2008; 7:1471-1483.
25. Song H, Chung SK, and Xu Y. Modeling Disease in Human ESCs Using an Efficient BAC-Based Homologous Recombination System. Cell Stem Cell. 2010; 6: 80-89.
26. Momcilovic O et al. Ionizing Radiation Induces Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated-Dependent Checkpoint Signaling and G(2) But Not G(1) Cell Cycle Arrest in Pluripotent Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Stem Cells. 2009; 27:1822-1835.
27. Wilczynska KM et al. Nuclear factor I isoforms regulate gene expression during the differentiation of human neural progenitors to astrocytes. Stem Cells. 2009; 27:1173-1181.
28. Gospodarowicz DD. Delgado, and I. Vlodavsky, Permissive effect of the extracellular matrix on cell proliferation in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980; 77: 4094-4098.
29. Tomimatsu N, Mukherjee B, and Burma S. Distinct roles of ATR and DNA-PKcs in triggering DNA damage responses in ATMdeficient cells. EMBO Rep. 2009; 10: 629-635.
30. Golding SE et al. Improved ATM kinase inhibitor KU-60019 radiosensitizes glioma cells, compromises insulin, AKT and ERK prosurvival signaling, and inhibits migration and invasion. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009; 8:2894-2902.
31. Jones KR et al. Radiosensitization of MDA-MB-231 breast tumor cells by adenovirus-mediated overexpression of a fragment of the XRCC4 protein. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005; 4:1541-1547.
32. Menear KA et al. 4-[3-(4-cyclopropanecarbonylpiperazine-1- carbonyl)-4-fluorobenzyl]-2H-phth alazin-1-one: a novel bioavailable inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1. J Med Chem. 2008; 51: 6581-6591.
33. Becker KA et al. Self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells is supported by a shortened G1 cell cycle phase. J Cell Physiol. 2006; 209:883-893.
34. Guirouilh-Barbat J et al. Impact of the KU80 pathway on NHEJ-induced genome rearrangements in mammalian cells. Mol Cell. 2004; 14:611-623.
35. Guirouilh-Barbat J et al. Defects in XRCC4 and KU80 differentially affect the joining of distal nonhomologous ends. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104:20902-20907.
36. Windhofer F et al. Marked dependence on growth state of backup pathways of NHEJ. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007; 68:1462-1470.
37. Wu W et al. Repair of radiation induced DNA double strand breaks by backup NHEJ is enhanced in G2. DNA Repair (Amst). 2008; 7:329-338.
38. Kuhfittig-Kulle S et al. The mutagenic potential of nonhomologous end joining in the absence of the NHEJ core factors Ku70/80, DNA-PKcs and XRCC4-LigIV. Mutagenesis. 2007; 22:217-233.
39. Feldmann E et al. DNA double-strand break repair in cell-free extracts from Ku80-deficient cells: implications for Ku serving as an alignment factor in non-homologous DNA end joining. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000; 28:2585-2596.
40. Chen S et al. Accurate in vitro end joining of a DNA double strand break with partially cohesive 3′-overhangs and 3′- phosphoglycolate termini: effect of Ku on repair fidelity. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276:24323-24330.
41. Lee JW et al. Requirement for XRCC4 and DNA ligase IV in alignment-based gap filling for nonhomologous DNA end joining in vitro. Cancer Res. 2003; 63: 22-24.
42. Meulle A et al. Positive regulation of DNA double strand break repair activity during differentiation of long life span cells: the example of adipogenesis. PLoS One. 2008; 3: e3345.
43. Yang YG et al. Ablation of PARP-1 does not interfere with the repair of DNA double-strand breaks, but compromises the reactivation of stalled replication forks. Oncogene. 2004; 23: 3872-3882.
44. Efroni S et al. Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2008; 2: 437-447.
45. Meshorer E et al. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev Cell. 2006; 10:105-116.
46. Goodarzi AA et al. ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin. Mol Cell. 2008; 31:167-177.
47. Bryant HE et al. PARP is activated at stalled forks to mediate Mre11-dependent replication restart and recombination. Embo J. 2009; 28: 2601-2615.
48. Miyazaki WY and Orr-Weaver TL. Sister-chromatid cohesion in mitosis and meiosis. Annu Rev Genet. 1994; 28:167-187.
49. Dhara SK et al. Human neural progenitor cells derived from embryonic stem cells in feeder-free cultures. Differentiation. 2008; 76: 454-464.
50. Lawrence DM et al. Astrocyte differentiation selectively upregulates CCL2/monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in cultured human brain-derived progenitor cells. Glia. 2006; 53: 81-91.
51. Hardcastle IR et al. Discovery of potent chromen-4-one inhibitors of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) using a small-molecule library approach. J Med Chem. 2005; 48:7829-7846.
52. Hickson I et al. Identification and characterization of a novel and specific inhibitor of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated kinase ATM. Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 9152-9159.
53. Golding SE et al. Extracellular signal-related kinase positively regulates ataxia telangiectasia mutated, homologous recombination repair, and the DNA damage response. Cancer Res. 2007; 67:1046-1053.
54. Shin S et al. Long-term proliferation of human embryonic stem cell-derived neuroepithelial cells using defined adherent culture conditions. Stem Cells. 2006; 24:125-38.