Biomechanics - Review of approaches for performance training in spinal manipulation

Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 732-739

  Triano, J J ^a   Descarreaux, M ^b   Dugas, C ^b  

^a CANADIAN MEMORIAL CHIROPRACTIC COLLEGE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À TROIS RIVIÈRES   (Canada)

Author keywords

Feedback; Motor learning; Motor skills; Spinal manipulation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; BIOMECHANICS; EDUCATIONAL THEORY; HUMAN; LEARNING THEORY; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE TRAINING; NEUROFEEDBACK; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SELF EVALUATION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CHIROPRACTIC; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; HUMANS; MANIPULATION, SPINAL; PHYSICAL THERAPY SPECIALTY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84866756761     PISSN: 10506411     EISSN: 18735711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.03.011     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Adams J.A. A closed-loop theory of motor learning. J Mot Behav 1971, 3(2):111-149.
2. Badets A., Blandin Y. Feedback schedules for motor-skill learning: the similarities and differences between physical and observational practice. J Mot Behav 2010, 42(4):257-268.
3. Barr R.B., Tagg J. Learning - a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change 1995, 27(6):13-25.
4. Chiviacowsky S., Wulf G. Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Res Q Exerc Sport 2007, 78(2):40-47.
5. Cleland J.A., Fritz J.M., Kulig K., Davenport T.E., Eberhart S., Magel J., et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a randomized clinical trial. Spine 2009, 34(25):2720-2729.
6. Cohen E., Triano J.J., McGregor M., Papakyriakou M. Biomechanical performance of spinal manipulation therapy by newly trained vs. practicing providers: does experience transfer to unfamiliar procedures?. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1995, 18(6):347-352.
7. Descarreaux M., Dugas C. Learning spinal manipulation skills: assessment of biomechanical parameters in a 5-year longitudinal study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010, 33(3):226-230.
8. Descarreaux M., Dugas C., Lalanne K., Vincelette M., Normand M.C. Learning spinal manipulation: the importance of augmented feedback relating to various kinetic parameters. Spine J 2006, 6(2):138-145.
9. Descarreaux M., Dugas C., Raymond J., Normand M.C. Kinetic analysis of expertise in spinal manipulative therapy using an instrumented manikin. J Chiropractic Med 2005, 4(2):53-60.
10. Downie A.S., Vemulpad S., Bull P.W. Quantifying the high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulative thrust: a systematic review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2010, 33(7):542-553.
11. Dunphy B.C., Williamson S.L. In pursuit of expertise. Toward an educational model for expertise development. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2004, 9(2):107-127.
12. Elliott D., Grierson L.E., Hayes S.J., Lyons J. Action representations in perception, motor control and learning: implications for medical education. Med Educ 2011, 45(2):119-131.
13. Fitts P.M., Posner M.I. Human performance 1967, Brooks Cole Publishing Company, Belmont, California.
14. Harvey M., Wynd S., Richardson L., Dugas C., Descarreaux M. Learning spinal manipulation. A comparison of two teaching models. J Chiropractic Educ 2011, 25(2):125-131.
15. Hauser A.M., Bowen D.M. Primer on preclinical instruction and evaluation. J Dent Educ 2009, 73(3):390-398.
16. Herzog W. Chapter 5: The mechanical, neuromuscular, and physiologic effects produced by spinal manipulation. Clinical biomechanics of spinal manipulation 2000, 191-207. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia. W. Herzog (Ed.).
17. Hodges N.J., Franks I.M. Modelling coaching practice: the role of instruction and demonstration. J Sports Sci 2002, 20:793-811.
18. Jordan M.I., Jacobs R.A. Hierarchical mixtures of experts and the EM algorithm. Neural Comput 1994, 6:181-214.
19. Kawchuk G.N., Herzog W. Biomechanical characterization (fingerprinting) of five novel methods of cervical spine manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1993, 16(9):573-577.
20. Kirstukas S.J., Backman J.A. Physician-applied contact pressure and table force response during unilateral thoracic manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999, 22(5):269-279.
21. Krakauer J.W., Mazzoni P. Human sensorimotor learning: adaptation, skill, and beyond. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2011, 21(4):636-644.
22. Kuehnel E., Beatty A., Gleberzon B. An intercollegiate comparison of prevalence of injuries among students during technique class from five chiropractic colleges throughout the world: a preliminary retrospective study. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2008 Aug, 52(3):169-174.
23. McGregor M., Quan K. Student choice, problem-based learning and academic acumen. Teach Learn Med 1996, 8:83-89.
24. Morcke A.M., Eika B. Medical faculty and curriculum design - 'no, no, it's like this: you give your lectures...'. Med Teach 2009, 31(7):642-648.
25. Reiley C.E., Akinbiyi T., Burschka D., Chang D., Okamura A.M., Yuh D.D. Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008, 135(1):196-202.
26. Reznick R.K., MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills - changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 2006, 355:2664-2669.
27. Rogers C.M., Triano J.J. Biomechanical measure validation for spinal manipulation in clinical settings. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003 Nov, 26(9):539-548.
28. Scaringe J.G., Chen D., Ross D. The effects of augmented sensory feedback precision on the acquisition and retention of a simulated chiropractic task. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002 Jan, 25(1):34-41.
29. Schmidt R.A., Lee T.D. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis 1999, Human Kinetics, Champaign, Illinois. 3rd ed.
30. Senstad O., Leboeuf-Yde C., Borchgrevink C.F. Side-effects of chiropractic spinal manipulation: types frequency, discomfort and course. Scand J Prim Health Care 1996, 14(1):50-53.
31. Srinivasan M., Hauer K.E., Der-Martirosian C., Wilkes M., Gesundheit N. Does feedback matter? Practice-based learning for medical students after a multi-institutional clinical performance examination. Med Educ 2007 Sep, 41(9):857-865.
32. Trempe M., Sabourin M., Rohbanfard H., Proteau L. Observation learning versus physical practice leads to different consolidation outcomes in a movement timing task. Exp Brain Res 2011, 209(2):181-192.
33. Triano J. Chapter 4: The mechanics of spinal manipulation. Clinical biomechanics of spinal manipulation 2000, Churchill Livingstone, New York, p. 92-190.
34. Triano J.J. Biomechanics of spinal manipulative therapy. Spine J 2001, 1(2):121-130.
35. Triano J. Chapter 6: Survey of mechanotransduction disorders. The survey & clinical application of manual therapy 2011, 93-107. Livingstone Elsevier, Edinburgh. H. King (Ed.).
36. Triano J.J., Bougie J., Rogers C., Scaringe J., Sorrels K., Skogsbergh D., et al. Procedural skills in spinal manipulation: do prerequisites matter?. Spine J 2004, 4(5):557-563.
37. Triano J.J., Gissler T., Forgie M., Milwid D. Maturation in rate of high-velocity, low-amplitude force development. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2011, 34(3):173-180.
38. Triano J., McGregor M., Giuliano D. A pilot study to use force-sensing tables to train manipulation/adjustment novices 2011, World Federation of Chiropractic, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
39. Triano J.J., Rogers C.M., Combs S., Potts D., Sorrels K. Developing skilled performance of lumbar spine manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002, 25(6):353-361.
40. Triano J.J., Rogers C.M., Combs S., Potts D., Sorrels K. Quantitative feedback versus standard training for cervical and thoracic manipulation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003, 22:131-138.
41. Triano J.J., Scaringe J., Bougie J., Rogers C. Effects of visual feedback on manipulation performance and patient ratings. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006, 29(5):378-385.
42. Triano J., Schultz A.B. Loads transmitted during lumbosacral spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 1997, 22(17):1955-1964.
43. Wulf G., Shea C., Lewthwaite R. Motor skill learning and performance: a review of influential factors. Med Educ 2010, 44(1):75-84.
44. Young T.J., Hayek R., Philipson S.A. A cervical manikin procedure for chiropractic skills development. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998, 21(4):241-245.