Dose-response relationship of robot-assisted stroke motor rehabilitation: The impact of initial motor status

Stroke

Volumn 43, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2729-2734

  Hsieh, Yu Wei ^a,c   Wu, Ching Yi ^c   Lin, Keh Chung ^a,e   Yao, Grace ^b   Wu, Kuen Yuh ^b   Chang, Ya Ju ^d  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c Graduate Institute of Behavioral Science   (Taiwan)

^d CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^e NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

randomized controlled trial; robot aided neurorehabilitation; stroke; treatment dosage

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOSE RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROBOT ASSISTED THERAPY; STROKE;

ADULT; AGED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR SKILLS; MOTOR SKILLS DISORDERS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866741319     PISSN: 00392499     EISSN: 15244628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.658807     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, Stewart J, Rudd AG, Howard R, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. Stroke. 2001;32:1279-1284. (Pubitemid 32530408)
2. Muntner P, Garrett E, Klag MJ, Coresh J. Trends in stroke prevalence between 1973 and 1991 in the us population 25 to 74 years of age. Stroke. 2002;33:1209-1213. (Pubitemid 34517037)
3. Cramer SC. Changes in motor system function and recovery after stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:231-238. (Pubitemid 39468282)
4. Mirelman A, Bonato P, Deutsch JE. Effects of training with a robotvirtual reality system compared with a robot alone on the gait of individuals after stroke. Stroke. 2009;40:169-174.
5. Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC. Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: a review of robotic systems and clinical results. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14:22-44. (Pubitemid 350156151)
6. Wallace AC, Talelli P, Dileone M, Oliver R, Ward N, Cloud G, et al. Standardizing the intensity of upper limb treatment in rehabilitation medicine. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:471-478.
7. Cooke EV, Mares K, Clark A, Tallis RC, Pomeroy VM. The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2010;8:60.
8. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35:2529-2539.
9. Teasell RW, Kalra L. What's new in stroke rehabilitation: back to basics. Stroke. 2005;36:215-217. (Pubitemid 40170787)
10. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Emken JL, Cramer SC. Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2004;6:497-525. (Pubitemid 39209506)
11. Dobkin BH. Progressive staging of pilot studies to improve phase III trials for motor interventions. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:197-206.
12. Fritz SL, Light KE, Patterson TS, Behrman AL, Davis SB. Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:1172-1177. (Pubitemid 40798734)
13. Lin KC, Huang YH, Hsieh YW, Wu CY. Potential predictors of motor and functional outcomes after distributed constraint-induced therapy for patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:336-342.
14. Hesse S, Werner C, Pohl M, Rueckriem S, Mehrholz J, Lingnau ML. Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers. Stroke. 2005;36:1960-1966. (Pubitemid 41266534)
15. Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Liao WW, Lin KC, Wu KY, Lee CY. Effects of treatment intensity in upper limb robot-assisted therapy for chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:503-511.
16. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The poststroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13-31.
17. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim IH, di Bella P, Johnson G. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:404-411. (Pubitemid 40716418)
18. Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Lin KC, Chang YF, Chen CL, Liu JS. Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2009;40:1386-1391.
19. Gregson JM, Leathley MJ, Moore AP, Smith TL, Sharma AK, Watkins CL. Reliability of measurements of muscle tone and muscle power in stroke patients. Age Ageing. 2000;29:223-228. (Pubitemid 30316206)
20. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, de Vet HC, Bouter LM. Clinimetric properties of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35:1410-1414. (Pubitemid 38697467)
21. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:950-963. (Pubitemid 36835117)
22. Yorkston KM, Johnson K, Boesflug E, Skala J, Amtmann D. Communicating about the experience of pain and fatigue in disability. Qual Life Res. 2010;19:243-251.
23. Housman SJ, Scott KM, Reinkensmeyer DJ. A randomized controlled trial of gravity-supported, computer-enhanced arm exercise for individuals with severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23: 505-514.
24. Volpe BT, Lynch D, Rykman-Berland A, Ferraro M, Galgano M, Hogan N, et al. Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:305-310. (Pubitemid 351561668)
25. Rosati G. The place of robotics in post-stroke rehabilitation. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010;7:753-758.
26. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:823-830.
27. Daly JJ, Hogan N, Perepezko EM, Krebs HI, Rogers JM, Goyal KS, et al. Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:723-736. (Pubitemid 43793502)
28. Luft AR, McCombe-Waller S, Whitall J, Forrester LW, Macko R, Sorkin JD, et al. Repetitive bilateral arm training and motor cortex activation in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004;292: 1853-1861. (Pubitemid 40169296)
29. Thielman G, Kaminski T, Gentile AM. Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: comparing 2 training protocols utilizing trunk restraint. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:697-705.
30. Sivan M, O'Connor RJ, Makower S, Levesley M, Bhakta B. Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:181-189.