Standardizing the intensity of upper limb treatment in rehabilitation medicine

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 471-478

  Wallace, A C ^a   Talelli, P ^a   Dileone, M ^b   Oliver, R ^a   Ward, N ^a   Cloud, G ^c   Greenwood, R ^d   Di Lazzaro, V ^b   Rothwell, J C ^a   Marsden, J F ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^c ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MUSCLE WEAKNESS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PILOT STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RAT; REHABILITATION; STANDARD; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ANIMALS; GOALS; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MUSCLE WEAKNESS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; RATS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REHABILITATION; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 77951950319     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: 14770873     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0269215509358944     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Marsden J., Greenwood R. Physiotherapy after stroke: define, divide and conquer. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005 ; 76: 465-466. (Pubitemid 40486565)
2. Dejong G., Horn SD, Gassaway JA, Slavin MD, Dijkers MP Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: using an inductive approach to examine the 'black box' of rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004 ; 85: 678-686.
3. Kwakkel G., van Peppen R., Wagenaar RC et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004 ; 35: 2529-2539. (Pubitemid 39458412)
4. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil 2006 ; 28: 823-830. (Pubitemid 43916264)
5. MRC Health Services and Public Health Research Board. A framework for the development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health, 2000. Accessed from: www.mrc.ac.uk/consumption/idcplg?IdcService=GET- FILE&dID=9025&dDocName=MRC003372&allowInterrupt=1.
6. Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E., Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005 ; 45: 201-206. (Pubitemid 40128115)
7. Henderson A., Korner-Bitensky N., Levin M. Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review of its effectiveness for upper limb motor recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007 ; 14: 52-61. (Pubitemid 46651524)
8. Mehrholz J., Platz T., Kugler J., Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008 ; 4: CD006876.
9. Harris JE, Eng JJ Strength training improves upper-limb function in individuals with stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2010 ; 41: 136-140.
10. Ada L., Dorsch S., Canning C. Strengthening interventions increase strength and improve activity after stroke: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 2006 ; 52: 241-248. (Pubitemid 44941645)
11. Morris SL, Dodd KJ, Morris ME Outcomes of progressive resistance strength training following stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2004 ; 18: 27-39. (Pubitemid 38111282)
12. Patten C., Lexell J., Brown HE Weakness and strength training in persons with poststroke hemiplegia: rationale, method, and efficacy. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004 ; 41: 293-312. (Pubitemid 39014768)
13. Medical Research Council. Aids to the investigation of the peripheral nervous system. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1975.
14. Butefisch C., Hummelsheim H., Denzler P., Mauritz KH Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995 ; 130: 59-68.
15. Carr S., Shepherd R. Stroke rehabilitation: guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2003.
16. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R., Chui HC, Azen SP A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004 ; 85: 620-628. (Pubitemid 38881052)
17. Thielman GT, Dean CM, Gentile AM Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training versus progressive resistive exercise. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004 ; 85: 1613-1618.
18. Elliott JM, Connolly KJ A classification of manipulative hand movements. Dev Med Child Neurol 1984 ; 26: 283-296.
19. Hanlon RE Motor learning following unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996 ; 77: 811-815.
20. Bradley JV Complete counterbalancing of immediate sequential effects in a Latin square design. J Am Stat Assoc 1958 ; 53: 525-528.
21. Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA Reduced frequency of knowldege of results enhances skill learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1990 ; 16: 677-691.
22. van Vliet PM, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil 2006 ; 28: 831-840. (Pubitemid 43916265)
23. Jones F. Strategies to enhance chronic disease self-management: how can we apply this to stroke? Disabil Rehabil 2006 ; 28: 841-847. (Pubitemid 43916266)
24. Borg GA Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982 ; 14: 377-381.
25. Schlosser RW Goal attainment scaling as a clinical measurement technique in communication disorders: a critical review. J Commun Disord 2004 ; 37: 217-239.
26. Rockwood K., Howlett S., Stadnyk K., Carver D., Powell C., Stolee P. Responsiveness of goal attainment scaling in a randomized controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 2003 ; 56: 736-743. (Pubitemid 37040809)
27. Kiresuk TE, ed. Goal attainment scaling: applications, theory and measurement. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1994.
28. Lyle RC A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981 ; 4: 483-492.
29. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H., Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med 2001 ; 33: 110-113. (Pubitemid 32479326)
30. van der Lee JH, De Groot V., Beckerman H., Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001 ; 82: 14-19. (Pubitemid 32057613)
31. Heller A., Wade DT, Wood VA, Sunderland A., Hewer RL, Ward E. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987 ; 50: 714-719. (Pubitemid 17076283)
32. Borg G. Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign, IL, Human Kinetics, 1998.
33. Lagally KM, Amorose AJ The validity of using prior ratings of perceive exertion to regulate resistance exercise intensity. Percept Mot Skills 2007 ; 104: 534-542.