Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: Comparing 2 training protocols utilizing trunk restraint

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 697-705

  Thielman, Gregory ^a,b   Kaminski, Terry ^a   Gentile, A M ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Hemiplegia; Reaching; Recovery of function; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BODY MOVEMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND FUNCTION; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; REHABILITATION CARE; RESISTIVE EXERCISE; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TASK RELATED TRAINING; TRUNK;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 54249143498     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968308315998     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Giuliani CA The relationship of spasticity to movement and considerations for therapeutic interventions. Neurol Rep. 1997 ; 21: 78-84.
2. Bobath B. Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and Treatment. 3 rd ed. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann ; 1990.
3. Miller GJ, Light KE Strength training in spastic hemiparesis: Should it be avoided ? Neurorehabilitation. 1997 ; 9: 17-28.
4. Morris SL, Dodd KJ, Morris ME Outcomes of progressive resistance strength training following stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2004 ; 18: 27-39.
5. Ada L., Canning CG, Westwood P. The patient as an active learner. In: Ada L, Canning CG, eds. Key Issues in Neurological Physiotherapy. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann ; 1990: 99-126.
6. Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 ; 81: 409-417.
7. Dean CM, Shepherd RB Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. Stroke. 1997 ; 28: 722-728.
8. Wu C., Trombly CA, Lin K., et al. A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: influences of object availability. Arc Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 ; 81: 95-101.
9. Thielman GT, Dean CM, Gentile AM Rehabilitation of reaching after stroke: task-related training vs. progressive resistive exercise. Arc Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 ; 85: 1613-1618.
10. Richards CL, Pohl P. Therapeutic intervention to improve upper extremity recovery and function. Clin Geriatr Med. 1999 ; 15 (4). 819-832.
11. Cirstea MC, Levin MF Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain. 2000 ; 123: 940-953.
12. Thielman GT, Gentile AM Rehabilitation of reaching poststroke: follow up assessment. Poster presentation: Annual Meeting of Society for Neuroscience. Orlando, FL ; 2002.
13. Michaelsen SM, Levin MF Short-term effects of practice with trunk restraint on reaching movements in patients with chronic stroke. Stroke. 2004 ; 35: 1914-1919.
14. Michaelsen SM, Dannenbaum R., Levin MF Task-specific training with trunk restraint on arm recovery in stroke, randomized control trial. Stroke. 2006 ; 37: 186-192.
15. Berglund K., Fugl-Meyer AR Upper extremity function in hemiplegia. A cross validation study of two assessment methods. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1986 ; 18: 155-157.
16. Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L., et al. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985 ; 65: 175-180.
17. Kaminski TR, Bock C., Gentile AM The coordination between trunk and arm motion during pointing movements. Exp Brain Res. 1995 ; 106 (3). 457-466.
18. Wolf SL, Thompson P., Morris D., et al. The EXCITE Trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005 ; 19: 194-205.
19. Judd CM, McClelland GH Data Analysis: A Model-Comparison Approach. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich ; 1989.
20. Levin MF, Michaelsen SM, Cirstea CM, et al. Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2002 ; 143: 171-180.
21. Kaminski TR, Bock C., Gentile AM The coordination between trunk and arm motion during pointing movements. Exp Brain Res. 1995 ; 106: 457-466.
22. Archambault P., Pigeon P., Feldman AG, et al. Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. Exp Brain Res. 1999 ; 126: 55-67.
23. Roby-Brami A., Feydy A., Combeaud M., et al. Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003 ; 107: 369-381.