Teaching for Understanding and Application of Science Knowledge

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 310-318

  Gallagher, James J ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037658169     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17325.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cajas, F. (1998). Teaching science for understanding and applications: The role of techology. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
2. Collins, A., Brown, L., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. Resnick (ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
3. DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Dewey, J. (1916). Method in science. General Science Quarterly, 1(1).
5. Gallagher, J. (1997). Structure of matter. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
6. Gallagher, J., Parker, J., & Ngwenya, L. (2000). Embedded assessment and reform of science teaching and learning. In preparation.
7. Gallagher, J., & Tobin, K. (1987). Teacher management and student engagement in high school science. Science Education, 71(4), 535–555.
8. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington DC: US Department of Education.
9. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Rutherford, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford.
11. Tobin, K., & Gallagher, J. (1987). What happens in high school science classrooms Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(6), 549–560.
12. Whitehead, A.N. (1916). The aims of education — A plea for reform. In A. N. Whitehead, (Ed., 1917), The organization of thought: Educational and scientific. Philadelphia: Lippencott.
13. Wilcox, S. (1998). Mathematics assessment resources service. East Lansing: Michigan State University.
14. Wilcox, S., & Lanier, P. (2000). Using assessment to reshape mathematics teaching: A casebook for teachers, teacher educators, and curriculum and staff development specialists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Wiske, M. (Ed.) (1998). Teaching for understanding: Linking research with practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.