Alignment-independent comparison of binding sites based on DrugScore potential fields encoded by 3D Zernike descriptors

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 52, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 2339-2347

  Nisius, Britta ^a   Gohlke, Holger ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEINS;

BIOLOGICAL PROCESS; COMPRESSION POWER; DRUG-TARGET INTERACTIONS; PROTEIN-BINDING SITES; SEQUENCE IDENTITY; SERIES EXPANSION; STRUCTURAL VARIATIONS; ZERNIKE POLYNOMIALS;

BINDING SITES;

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METABOLISM; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

BINDING SITES; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; PROTEINS;

EID: 84866637893     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci300244y     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Laskowski, R. A.; Luscombe, N. M.; Swindells, M. B.; Thornton, J. M. Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function Protein Sci. 1996, 5, 2438-2452
2. Gohlke, H.; Klebe, G. Approaches to the description and prediction of the binding affinity of small-molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2644-2676
3. Henrich, S.; Salo-Ahen, O. M. H.; Huang, B.; Rippmann, F.; Cruciani, G.; Wade, R. C. Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding sites for ligand design J. Mol. Recognit. 2009, 23, 209-219
4. Nisius, B.; Sha, F.; Gohlke, H. Structure-based computational analysis of protein binding sites for function and druggability prediction J. Biotechnol. 2012, 159, 123-134
5. Weber, A.; Casini, A.; Heine, A.; Kuhn, D.; Supuran, C. T.; Scozzafava, A.; Klebe, G. Unexpected nanomolar inhibition of carbonic anhydrases by COX-2-selective celecoxib: new pharmacological opportunities due to related binding site recognition J. Med. Chem. 2004, 4, 550-557
6. Kinnings, S. L.; Liu, N.; Buchmeier, N.; Tonge, P. J.; Xie, L.; Bourne, P. E. Drug discovery using chemical systems biology: repositioning the safe medicine Comtan to treat multi-drug and extensively drug resistance tuberculosis PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5, e10000423
7. De Franchi, E.; Schalon, C.; Messa, M.; Onofri, F.; Benfenati, F.; Rognan, D. Binding of protein kinase inhibitors to synapsin I inferred from pair-wise binding site similarity measurements PLoS One 2010, 5, e12214
8. Miletti, F.; Vulpetti, A. Predicting polypharmacology by binding site similarity: from kinases to the protein universe J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 1418-1431
9. Tseng, Y. Y.; Dundas, J.; Liang, J. Predicting protein function and binding profile via matching of local evolutionary and geometric surface patterns J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 387, 451-464
10. Pérot, S.; Sperandio, O.; Miteva, M. A.; Camproux, A.-C.; Villoutreix, B. O. Druggable pockets and binding site centric chemical space: a paradigm shift in drug discovery Drug Discovery Today 2010, 15, 656-667
11. Leis, S.; Schneider., S.; Zacharias, M. In silico prediction of binding sites on proteins Curr. Med. Chem. 2010, 17, 1550-1562
12. Craig, I. R.; Pfleger, C.; Gohlke, H.; Essex, J. W.; Spiegel, K. Pocket-space maps to identify novel binding-site conformations in proteins J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2666-2679
13. Kellenberger, E.; Schalon, C.; Rognan, D. How to measure the similarity between protein ligand-binding sites? Curr. Comput.-Aided Drug Des. 2008, 4, 209-220
14. Weill, N.; Rognan, D. Alignment-free ultra-high-throughput comparison of druggable protein-ligand binding sites J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 123-135
15. Baroni, M.; Cruciani, G.; Sciabola, S.; Perruccio, F.; Mason, J. S. A common reference framework for analyzing/comparing proteins and ligands. Fingerprints for ligands and proteins (FLAP): theory and applications J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 279-294
16. Pastor, M.; Cruciani, G.; McLay, I.; Pickett, S.; Clementi, S. GRid-INdependent descriptors (GRIND): a novel class of alignment-independent three-dimensional molecular descriptors J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3233-3243
17. Chikhi, R.; Sael, L.; Kihara, D. Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors Proteins 2010, 78, 2007-2028
18. Hopkins, A. L.; Groom, C. R. The druggable genome Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2002, 1, 72-730
19. Kahraman, A.; Morris, R. J.; Laskowski, R. A.; Thornton, J. M. Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 386, 283-301
20. Schmitt, S.; Kuhn, D.; Klebe, G. A new method to detect related function among proteins independent of sequence and fold homology J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 323, 387-406
21. Xie, L.; Bourne, P. E. Detecting evolutionary relationships across existing fold space, using sequence-order-independent profile-profile alignments Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 5441-5446
22. Hoffmann, B.; Zaslavskiy, M.; Vert, J. P.; Stoven, V. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction BMC Bioinf. 2010, 11, 99
23. Cross, S.; Cruciani, G. Molecular fields in drug discovery: getting old or reaching maturity Drug Discovery Today 2010, 15, 23-32
24. Goodford, P. J. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 849-857
25. Kastenholz, M. A.; Pastor, M.; Cruciani, G.; Haaksma, E. E. J.; Fox, T. GRID/CPCA: a new computational tool to design selective ligands J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3033-3044
26. Naumann, T.; Matter, H. Structural classification of protein kinases using 3D molecular interaction field analysis of their ligand binding sites: target family landscapes J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2366-2378
27. Pirard, B. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors target family landscapes: a chemometrical approach to ligand selectivity based on protein binding site analysis J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 785-796
28. Angel, D.; Martinez, G. C.; Pastor, M. Development and validation of AMANDA, a new algorithm for selecting highly relevant regions in molecular interaction fields J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 1813-1823
29. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 337-356
30. th Scandinavian conference on image analysis, Kangerlussuaq, Greenland, 1999; pp 85-93.
31. Novotni, M.; Klein, R. Shape retrieval using 3D Zernike descriptors Comput.-Aided Des. 2004, 36, 1047-1062
32. Grandison, S.; Roberts, C.; Morris, R. J. The application of 3D Zernike moments for the description of "model-free" molecular structure, functional motion, and structural reliability J. Comput. Biol. 2009, 16, 487-500
33. Venkatraman, V.; Sael, L.; Kihara, D. Potential for protein surface shape analysis using spherical harmonics and 3D Zernike descriptors Cell. Biochem. Biophys. 2009, 54, 23-32
34. Mak, L.; Grandison, S.; Morris, R. J. An extension of spherical harmonics to region-based rotationally invariant descriptors for molecular shape description and comparison J. Mol. Graphics Model. 2008, 26, 1035-1045
35. Venkatraman, V.; Chakravarthy, P. R.; Kihara, D. Application of 3D Zernike descriptors to shape-based ligand similarity searching J. Cheminf. 2009, 1, 1-19
36. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Predicting binding modes, binding affinities and 'hot spots' for protein-ligand complexes using a knowledge-based scoring function Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 2000, 20, 115-144
37. Sotriffer, C. A.; Gohlke, H.; Klebe, G. Docking into knowledge-based potential fields: a comparative evaluation of DrugScore J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1967-1970
38. Ferrara, P.; Gohlke, H.; Price, D. J.; Klebe, G.; Brooks, C. L. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 3032-3047
39. RNA-knowledge-based scoring function to predict RNA-ligand interactions J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 1868-1876
40. PPI webserver: Fast and accurate in silico alanine scanning for scoring protein-protein interactions Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, W480-W486
41. Huang, N.; Jacobson, M. P. Binding-site assessment by virtual fragment screening PLoS One 2010, 5, e10109
42. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Available at: http:www.R-project.org.
43. Ghersi, D.; Sanchez, R. EasyMIF and SiteHound: a toolkit for the identification of ligand-binding sites in protein structures Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 3185-3186
44. Van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; Groenhof, G.; Mark, A. E.; Berendsen, H. J. C. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26 (16) 1701-1718
45. Ahmed, A.; Kazemi, S.; Gohlke, H. Protein flexibility and mobility in structure-based drug design Front. Drug Des. Discovery 2007, 3, 455-476
46. Cozzini, P.; Kellogg, G. E.; Spyrakis, F.; Abraham, D. J.; Costantino, G.; Emerson, A.; Fanelli, F.; Gohlke, H.; Kuhn, L. A.; Morris, G. M.; Orozco, M.; Pertinhez, T. A.; Rizzi, M.; Sortriffer, C. Target flexibility: an emerging consideration in drug discovery and design J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 6237-6255
47. Wang, R.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking J. Med. Chem. 2003, 44, 2287-2303
48. Kazemi, S.; Krüger, D. M.; Sirockin, F.; Gohlke, H. Elastic potential grids: accurate and efficient representation of intermolecular interactions for fully-flexible docking ChemMedChem 2009, 49, 181-188