EasyMIFs and SiteHound: A toolkit for the identification of ligand-binding sites in protein structures

Bioinformatics

Volumn 25, Issue 23, 2009, Pages 3185-3186

  Ghersi, Dario ^a   Sanchez, Roberto ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE;

BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 75949102748     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp562     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Berezin, C. et al. (2004) ConSeq: the identification of functionally and structurally important residues in protein sequences. Bioinformatics, 20, 1322-1324.
2. Capra, J.A. and Singh, M. (2007) Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation. Bioinformatics, 23, 1875-1882.
3. Cheng, G. et al. (2005) Improvement in protein functional site prediction by distinguishing structural and functional constraints on protein family evolution using computational design. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 5861-5867.
4. Cruciani, G. (2006) Molecular Interaction Fields: Applications in Drug Discovery and ADME Prediction. Wiley-VCH, Chichester.
5. Cui, M. et al. (2008) Prediction of protein loop structures using a local move Monte Carlo approach and a grid-based force field. Protein Eng. Des. Sel., 21, 729-735.
6. DeLano, W.L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Available at http://www.pymol.org.
7. Dundas, J. et al. (2006) CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, W116-W118.
8. Ghersi, D. and Sanchez, R. (2009) Improving accuracy and efficiency of blind protein-ligand docking by focusing on predicted binding sites. Proteins, 74, 417-424.
9. Hernandez, M. et al. (2009) SITEHOUND-web: a server for ligand binding site identification in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, W413-W416.
10. Laurie, A.T. and Jackson, R.M. (2005) Q-SiteFinder: an energy-based method for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites. Bioinformatics, 21, 1908-1916.
11. Liang, S. et al. (2006) Protein binding site prediction usinga ne mpirical scoring function. Nucleic Acids Res., 34, 3698-3707.
12. Lichtarge, O. and Sowa, M.E. (2002) Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 12, 21-27.
13. Solmajer, T. and Mehler, E.L. (1991) Electrostatic screening in molecular dynamics simulations. Protein Eng., 4, 911-917.
14. Van Der Spoel, D. et al. (2005) GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem., 26, 1701-1718.
15. Wang, K. et al. (2008) Protein meta-functional signatures from combining sequence, structure, evolution, and amino acid property information. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000181.