Influence of surface properties of resin-based composites on in vitro Streptococcus mutans biofilm development

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 120, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 458-465

  Ionescu, Andrei ^a   Wutscher, Elisabeth ^b   Brambilla, Eugenio ^a   Schneider Feyrer, Sibylle ^c   Giessibl, Franz J ^b   Hahnel, Sebastian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Atomic force microscopy; Biofilm; Bioreactors; Resin based composite; Streptococcus mutans

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BACTERIUM ADHERENCE; BIOFILM; CHEMISTRY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

BACTERIAL ADHESION; BIOFILMS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL POLISHING; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; STREPTOCOCCUS MUTANS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84866451756     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2012.00983.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Gilmour AS, Evans P, Addy LD. Attitudes of general dental practitioners in the UK to the use of composite materials in posterior teeth. Br Dent J 2007; 202: E32.
2. Ferracane JL. Resin composite - state of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29-38.
3. Lynch CD, Frazier KB, McConnell RJ, Blum IR, Wilson NH. State-of-the-art techniques in operative dentistry: contemporary teaching of posterior composites in UK and Irish dental schools. Br Dent J 2010; 209: 129-136.
4. Lee JH, Um CM, Lee IB. Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in monomer and filler composition. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 515-526.
5. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 34-38.
6. Deligeorgi V, Mjör IA, Wilson NH. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Prim Dent Care 2001; 8: 5-11.
7. Braga SR, Vasconcelos BT, Macedo MR, Martins VR, Sobral MA. Reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorative materials in Brazil. Quintessence Int 2007; 38: 189-194.
8. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, DeRouen TA. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 775-783.
9. Lobo MM, Goncalves RB, Ambrosano GM, Pimenta LA. Chemical or microbiological models of secondary caries development around different dental restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 74: 725-731.
10. van Dijk J, Herkströter F, Busscher H, Weerkamp A, Jansen H, Arends J. Surface-free energy and bacterial adhesion. An in vivo study in beagle dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14: 300-304.
11. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-269.
12. Teughels W, VanAssche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17(Suppl 2): 68-81.
13. Bürgers R, Schneider-Brachert W, Rosentritt M, Handel G, Hahnel S. Candida albicans adhesion to composite resin materials. Clin Oral Invest 2009; 13: 293-299.
14. Carlén A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, Holmberg K, Olsson J. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin. Biomaterials 2001; 22: 481-487.
15. Jefferies SR, Boston DW. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis. J Clin Dent 2010; 21: 20-23.
16. Marghalani HY. Effect of finishing/polishing systems on the surface roughness of novel posterior composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2010; 22: 127-138.
17. De Oliveira ALBM, Domingos PADS, Palma-Dibb RG, Garcia PPNS. Chemical and morphological features of nanofilled composite resin: influence of finishing and polishing procedures and fluoride solutions. Microsc Res Tech 2011; 75: 212-219.
18. Hashimoto K, Yamamoto H. Influence of composite resin components on adherence of oral streptococci. Jpn J Conservative Dent 1998; 41: 1-15.
19. Ono M, Nikaido T, Iked M, Imai S, Hanada N, Tagami J, Matin K. Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation. Dent Mater 2007; 26: 613-622.
20. Sissons CH, Cutress TW, Hoffman MP, Wakefield JS. A multi-station dental plaque microcosm (artificial mouth) for the study of plaque growth, metabolism, pH, and mineralization. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 1409-1416.
21. Sissons CH, Yakub S. Suppression of urease levels in Streptococcus salivarius by cysteine, related compounds and by sulfide. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2000; 15: 317-324.
22. Sissons CH, Cutress TW, Faulds G, Wong L. pH responses to sucrose and the formation formation of pH gradients in thick 'artificial mouth' microcosm plaques. Arch Oral Biol 1992; 37: 913-922.
23. Sissons CH. Artificial dental plaque biofilm model systems. Adv Dent Res 1997; 11: 110-126.
24. Binnig G, Quate C, Gerber CH. Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 1986; 56: 930-933.
25. Giessibl FJ. High-speed force sensor for force microscopy and profilometry utilizing a quartz tuning fork. Appl Phys Lett 1998; 73: 3956-3958.
26. Giessibl FJ. Atomic resolution on Si(111)-(7×7) by noncontact atomic force microscopy with a force sensor based on a quartz tuning fork. Appl Phys Lett 2000; 76: 1470-1472.
27. Wutscher E, Giessibl FJ. Atomic force microscopy at ambient and liquid conditions with stiff sensors and small amplitudes. Rev Sci Instrum 2011; 82: 093703.
28. Albrecht TR, Grütter P, Horne D, Rugar D. Frequency modulation detection using high-Q cantilevers for enhanced force microscope sensitivity. J Appl Phys 1991; 69: 668-673.
29. Horcas I, Fernández R, Gómez-Rodríguez JM, Colchero J, Gómez-Herrero J, Baro AM. WSXM: a software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev Sci Instrum 2007; 78: 013705.
30. Ström G, Fredriksson M, Stenius P. Contact angles, work of adhesion, and interfacial tensions at a dissolving hydrocarbon surface. J Colloid Interface Sci 1987; 119: 352-361.
31. Owens DK, Wendt RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 1969; 13: 1741-1747.
32. Ledder RG, Sreenivasan PK, DeVizio W, McBain AJ. Evaluation of the specificity and effectiveness of selected oral hygiene actives in salivary biofilm microcosms. J Med Microbiol 2010; 59: 1462-1468.
33. Paes Leme AF, Bellato CM, Bedi G, Cury AA, Koo H, Cury JA. Effects of sucrose on the extracellular matrix of plaque-like biofilm formed in vivo, studied by proteomic analysis. Caries Res 2008; 42: 435-443.
34. De Moraes RR, Gonçalves LS, Lancellotti AC, Consani S, Correr-Sobrinho L, Sinhoreti MA. Nanohybrid resin composites: nanofiller loaded materials or traditional microhybrid resins? Oper Dent 2009; 34: 551-557.
35. Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, van der Mei HC. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 657-665.
36. Quirynen M, Bollen CML. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. J Clin Periodontol 1995; 22: 1-14.
37. Santerre JP, Shajii L, Leung BW. Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001; 12: 136-151.
38. Hansel C, Leyhausen G, Mai UEH, Geurtsen W. Effects of various resin composite (co)monomers and extracts on two caries-associated micro-organisms in vitro. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 60-67.
39. Kawai K, Tsuchitani Y. Effects of resin composite components on glucosyltransferase of cariogenic bacterium. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 51: 123-127.
40. Pratt-Terpstra IH, Weerkamp AH, Busscher HJ. Adhesion of oral streptococci from a flowing suspension to uncoated and albumin-coated surfaces. J Gen Microbiol 1987; 133: 3199-3206.
41. Ahn S-J, Lim B-S, Lee S-J. Surface characteristics of orthodontic adhesives and effects on streptococcal adhesion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 489-495.