Reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorative materials in Brazil

Quintessence International

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2007, Pages e189-e194

  Braga, Sheila Regina Maia ^a   Vasconcelos, Beatriz Tholt ^a   de Paula Macedo, Manoel Roberto ^a   Martins, Vinicius R Geraldo ^a   Sobral, Maria Angela Pita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Primary caries; Replacement; Resin composite; Restoration; Restorative material; Secondary caries

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RETREATMENT; TOOTH FRACTURE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BRAZIL; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYURETHANES; RETREATMENT; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 34648835129     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Mjör IA. Placement and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 1981; 6: 49-54.
2. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of resin based composite restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 82-85.
3. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 70-73.
4. York AK, Stephen AJ. Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy dental corps. Oper Dent 1993; 18: 203-208.
5. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1994; 19: 228-232.
6. Wilson NHF, Burke FJT, Mjör IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 245-248.
7. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 2000; 58: 97-101.
8. Mjör IA, Moohead JE, Dahl JE. Reason for replacement of restoration in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000; 50: 361-368.
9. Deligeorgi V, Wilson NHF, Fouzas D, Kouklaki E, Burke FJT, Mjör IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations in student clinics in Manchester and Athens. Eur J Dent Educ 2000; 4: 153-159.
10. Al Negrish AS. Reasons for placement and replacement of amalgam restoration in Jordan. Int Dent J 2001; 51: 109-115.
11. Mjör IA, Shen C, Eliasson ST, Richter S. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 117-123.
12. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restoration in Germany. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 34-38.
13. Franco EB, Pascotto RC. Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations. Rev Odontol Univ São Paulo 1990; 4: 234-240.
14. Fontana M, Gonzalez-Cabezas C. Secondary caries and restoration replacement an unresolved problem. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000; 21: 15-24.
15. Bader J, Levitch L, Shugars D, Heymann H, McClure F. How dentists classified and treated non-carious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124: 46-54.
16. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restoration at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent 2001; 29: 317-324.
17. Geramy A, Sharafoddin F. Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finite element method. Quintessence Int 2003; 34: 526-533.
18. Burke FJ, Johnston N, Wiggs RB, Hall AF. An alternative hypothesis from veterinary science for the pathogenesis of noncarious cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 2000; 31: 475-482.
19. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Tobias TS, Cohen RE. Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions: A re-evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 845-850.
20. Rees JS, Jagger DC. Abfractions lesions: Myth or reality? J Esthet Rest Dent 2003; 15: 263-271.
21. Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hickel R. Direct posterior restorations: Clinical results and new developments. Dent Clin N Am 2002; 46: 303-339.
22. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of the method of funding on the age of failed restorations in general dental practice in the UK. Br Dent J 2002; 192: 699-702.
23. Odom JG. Ethics and dental amalgam removal. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 122: 69-71.
24. Sfikas PM. Can a dentist ethically remove serviceable amalgam restorations? J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127: 685-687.
25. Heydt H. CDA adopts new ethical statement on amalgam replacement. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1995; 50: 593.
26. Christensen GJ. Esthetic dentistry and ethics. Quintessence Int 1989; 20: 747-753.
27. Chiodo GT, Tolle SW. Can a rational patient make an irrational choice? The dental amalgam controversy. Gen Dent 1992; 40: 184-187.