Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and quantitative SPECT in a rat glioma model

Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 494-500

  Skinner, Jack T ^a,b   Yankeelov, Thomas E ^a,b,c,d   Peterson, Todd E ^b,c,d   Does, Mark D ^a,b,c  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

DCE; Diffusion; Dynamic contrast; MRI; Pharmacokinetic modeling; Radionuclide; SPECT; Tumor

Indexed keywords

ERYTHROCYTE TC 99M; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; PENTETATE INDIUM IN 111; RADIOISOTOPE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BRAIN TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIFFUSION; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ERYTHROCYTE; EXTRACELLULAR SPACE; FEMALE; GLIOMA; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISOTOPE LABELING; MAGNET; MICROVASCULATURE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GLIOMA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASM TRANSPLANTATION; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 84866444609     PISSN: 15554309     EISSN: 15554317     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.1479     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ludeman L, Grieger W, Wurm R, Wust P, Zimmer C. Quantitative measurement of leakage volume and permeability in gliomas, meningiomas and brain metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imag 2005; 23: 833-841.
2. Harrer JU, Parker GJM, Haroon HA, Buckley DL, Embelton K, Roberts C, Baleriaux D, Jackson A. Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas. J Magn Reson Imag 2004; 20: 748-757.
3. Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imag 1997; 7: 91-101.
4. Yankeelov TE, Rooney WD, Li X, Springer CS. Variation of the relaxographic shutter-speed for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curves shape. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 1151-1169.
5. Landis CS, Li X, Telang FW, Coderre JA, Micca PL, Rooney WD, Latour LL, Vetek G, Palyka I, Springer CS. Determination of the MRI contrast agent concentration time course in vivo following bolus injection: effect of equilibrium transcytolemmal water exchange. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 563-574.
6. Sourbron SP, Buckley DL. On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med 2011; 66(3): 735-745.
7. Pellerin M, Yankeelov TE, Lepage M. Incorporating contrast agent diffusion into the analysis of DCE-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 1124-1134.
8. Cheng HLM. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imag 2008; 28: 736-743.
9. Pickup S, Zhou R, Glickson J. MRI estimation of the arterial input function in mice. Acad Radiol 2003; 10: 963-968.
10. Zhou R, Pickup S, Yankeelov TE, Springer CS, Glickson JD. Simultaneous measurement of arterial input function and tumor pharmacokinetics in mice by dynamic contrast enhanced imaging: Effects of transcytolemmal water exchange. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 248-257.
11. Yankeelov TE, Luci JL, Lepage M, Li R, Debusk L, Lin PC, Price R, Gore JC. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. Magn Reson Imag 2005; 23: 519-529.
12. Yankeelov TE, Cron GO, Addison CL, Wallace JC, Wilkins RC, Pappas BA, Santyr GE, Gore JC. Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurements of an AIF in the analysis of DCE-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 353-361.
13. Donahue KM, Burstein D, Manning WJ, Gray ML. Studies of Gd-DTP relaxivity and proton exchange rate in tissue. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32: 66-76.
14. 8 cluster as a potential MRI contrast agent. NMR Biomed 2005; 18: 300-307.
15. 1) at high magnetic field strengths. Magn Reson Imag 2007; 25(5): 733-735.
16. Tsekos NV, Zhang F, Merkle H, Nagayama M, Ladecola C, Kim S. Quantitative measurements of cerebral blood flow in rats using the FAIR technique: correlation with previous lodoantipyrine autoradiographic studies. Magn Reson Med 1998; 34(4): 564-573.
17. Donahue KM, Weisskoff RM, Parmelee DJ, Callahan RJ, Wilkinson RA, Mandeville JB, Rosen BR. Dynamic Gd-DTPA enhanced MRI measurements of tissue cell volume fraction. Magn Reson Med 1995; 34: 423-432.
18. Dedieu V, Finat-Duclos F, Renou JP, Joffre F, Vincensini D. In vivo tissue extracellular volume fraction measurement by dynamic spin-lattice MRI relaxometry: application to the characterization of muscle fiber types. Invest Radiol 1999; 34(3): 185-189.
19. Gregory TR, Wallis CJ, Printz MP. Regional changes in rat brain angiotensinogen following bilateral nephrectomy. Hypertension 1982; 4: 827-838.
20. Galons JP, Trouard T, Gmitro AF, Lien YH. Hemodialysis increases apparent diffusion coefficient of brain water in nephrectomized rats measured by isotropic diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Invest 1996; 98(3): 750-755.
21. Landis CS, Li X, Telang FW, Molina PE, Palyka I, Vetek G, Springer Jr CS. Equilibrium transcytolemmal water-exchange kinetics in skeletal muscle in vivo. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 467-478.
22. Li X, Rooney WD, Varallyay CG, Gahramanov S, Muldoon LL, Goodman JA, Tagge IJ, Selzer AH, Pike MM, Neuwelt EA, Springer CS. Dynamic-contrast-enhanced-MRI with extravasating contrast reagent: rat cerebral glioma blood volume determination. J Magn Reson 2010; 206: 190-199.
23. Henderson E, Rutt BK, Lee TY. Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. Magn Reson Imag 1998; 16(9): 1057-1073.
24. 1-field inhomogeneity on measurement of the arterial input function in axial 3D spoiled gradient echo dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65(1): 108-119.
25. Garpebring A, Wirestam R, Östlund N, Karlsson M. Effects of inflow and radiofrequency spoiling on the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: A combined phantom and simulation study. Magn Reson Med 2011; 65(6): 1670-1679.
26. McIntyre DJ, Ludwig C, Pasan A, Grifffiths JR. A method for interleaved acquisition of a vascular input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in experimental rat tumours. NMR Biomed 2004; 17: 132-143.
27. Kreis D, Schulz D, Stein M, Preuss M, Nestler U. Assessment of parameters influencing the blood flow velocities in cerebral arteries of the rat using ultrasonographic examination. Neurol Res 2011; 33(4): 389-395.
28. Heisen M, Fan X, Buurman J, van Riel NAW, Karczmar GS, Romeny B. The influence of temporal resolution in determining pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 811-816.
29. Fan X, Haney CR, Mustafi D, Yang C, Zamora M, Markiewicz EJ, Karczmar GS. Use of a reference tissue and blood vessel to measure the arterial input function in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 1821-1826.
30. Ragan DK, Bankson JA. Suppression of vascular enhancement artifacts through the use of a multiband, selectively spoiled radiofrequency excitation pulse. J Magn Reson Imag 2011; 33: 1256-1261.
31. e in DCE-MRI. Abstract. Proc. 19th Meeting ISMRM, Montreal, 2011; 1081.
32. Mills SJ, Soh C, Rose CJ, Cheung S, Zhao S, Parker GJM, Jackson A. Candidate biomarkers of extravascular extracellular space: a direct comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-derived measurement of the volume of the extravascular extracellular space in glioblastoma multiforme. Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 549-553.
33. Loveless ME, Lawson D, Collins M, Reimer C, Huszar D, Halliday J, Waterton JC, Gore JC, Yankeelov TE. Correlation of quantitative tissue characteristics from DCE-MRI, DW-MRI and histology in murine tumors. Abstract. Proc. 19th Meeting ISMRM, Montreal, 2011; 3166.
34. Arlinghaus LR, Li X, Rahman AR, Welch EB, Xu L, Gore JC, Yankeelov TE. On the relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient and extravascular extracellular volume fraction in human breast cancer. Magn Reson Imag 2011; 29: 630-638.
35. Wedham SB, Low SA, Yang SX, Chow CK, Choyke P, Danforth D, Hewitt SM, Berman A, Steinberg SM, Liewehr DJ, Plehn J, Doshi A, Thomasson D, McCarthy N, Koeppen H, Sherman M, Zujewski J, Camphausen K, Chen H, Swain SM. Antiangiogenic and antitumor effects of bevacizumab in patients with inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 769-777.
36. Yankeelov TE, Lepage M, Chakravarthy A, Broome EE, Niermann KJ, Kelley MC, Meszoely I, Mayer IA, Herman CR, McManus K, Price RR, Gore JC. Integration of quantitative DCE-MRI and ADC mapping to monitor treatment response in human breast cancer: initial results. Magn Reson Imag 2007; 25: 1-13.