Use of a reference tissue and blood vessel to measure the arterial input function in DCEMRI

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 64, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1821-1826

  Fan, Xiaobing ^a   Haney, Chad R ^a   Mustafi, Devkumar ^a   Yang, Cheng ^a   Zamora, Marta ^a   Markiewicz, Erica J ^a   Karczmar, Gregory S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

arterial input function; dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; pharmacokinetic model; volume transfer constant of contrast agent

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; CONTRAST MEDIA; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ACCURATE MEASUREMENT; ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; CONTRAST AGENT; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL; PLASMA CONCENTRATION; QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION;

TISSUE;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADODIAMIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTERY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HINDLIMB; MEASUREMENT; METASTASIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PROSTATE TUMOR; RAT; REFERENCE VALUE; RODENT; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

EID: 78149289435     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22551     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Radjenovic A, Dall BJ, Ridgway JP, Smith MA,. Measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters in histologically graded invasive breast tumours using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Br J Radiol 2008; 81: 120-128.
2. Bonekamp D, Macura KJ,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the prostate. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 19: 273-284.
3. Armitage P, Behrenbruch C, Brady M, Moore N,. Extracting and visualizing physiological parameters using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Med Image Anal 2005; 9: 315-329.
4. Port RE, Knopp MV, Brix G,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using Gd-DTPA: interindividual variability of the arterial input function and consequences for the assessment of kinetics in tumors. Magn Reson Med 2001; 45: 1030-1038.
5. McGrath DM, Bradley DP, Tessier JL, Lacey T, Taylor CJ, Parker GJ,. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 1173-1184.
6. Tofts PS, Kermode AG,. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991; 17: 357-367.
7. Kovar DA, Lewis M, Karczmar GS,. A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: input functions derived from reference tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 1126-1134.
8. Hansen AE, Pedersen H, Rostrup E, Larsson HB,. Partial volume effect (PVE) on the arterial input function (AIF) in T1-weighted perfusion imaging and limitations of the multiplicative rescaling approach. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 1055-1059.
9. Ivancevic MK, Zimine I, Montet X, Hyacinthe JN, Lazeyras F, Foxall D, Vallee JP,. Inflow effect correction in fast gradient-echo perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 885-891.
10. Yang C, Karczmar GS, Medved M, Stadler WM,. Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies: fundamental concepts and simulations. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 1110-1117.
11. Yankeelov TE, Luci JJ, Lepage M, Li R, Debusk L, Lin PC, Price RR, Gore JC,. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. Magn Reson Imaging 2005; 23: 519-529.
12. Yang C, Karczmar GS, Medved M, Stadler WM,. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 1266-1275.
13. Medved M, Karczmar G, Yang C, Dignam J, Gajewski TF, Kindler H, Vokes E, MacEneany P, Mitchell MT, Stadler WM,. Semiquantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in cancer patients: Variability and changes in tumor tissue over time. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20: 122-128.
14. Joos KM, Blair WF, Brown TD, Gable RH,. Flow field mapping in the anesthetized rat. Microsurgery 1990; 11: 12-18.
15. McIntyre DJ, Ludwig C, Pasan A, Griffiths JR,. A method for interleaved acquisition of a vascular input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in experimental rat tumours. NMR Biomed 2004; 17: 132-143.
16. Fan X, Medved M, River JN, Zamora M, Corot C, Robert P, Bourrinet P, Lipton M, Culp RM, Karczmar GS,. New model for analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 487-494.
17. Weidensteiner C, Rausch M, McSheehy PM, Allegrini PR,. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor-bearing rats and mice with inversion recovery TrueFISP and two contrast agents at 4.7 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 646-656.
18. Yankeelov TE, Cron GO, Addison CL, Wallace JC, Wilkins RC, Pappas BA, Santyr GE, Gore JC,. Comparison of a reference region model with direct measurement of an AIF in the analysis of DCE-MRI data. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 353-361.
19. Yankeelov TE, Rooney WD, Li X, Springer CS, Jr., Variation of the relaxographic "shutter-speed" for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 1151-1169.
20. Parker GJ, Roberts C, Macdonald A, Buonaccorsi GA, Cheung S, Buckley DL, Jackson A, Watson Y, Davies K, Jayson GC,. Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 993-1000.
21. Evelhoch JL,. Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 254-259.
22. Yankeelov TE, Rooney WD, Huang W, Dyke JP, Li X, Tudorica A, Lee JH, Koutcher JA, Springer CS, Jr., Evidence for shutter-speed variation in CR bolus-tracking studies of human pathology. NMR Biomed 2005; 18: 173-185.
23. Cheng HL,. T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1-weighted DCE-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1073-1078.
24. Fan X, Karczmar GS,. A new approach to analysis of the impulse response function (IRF) in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCEMRI): a simulation study. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 229-239.