Effects of inflow and radiofrequency spoiling on the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: A combined phantom and simulation study

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1670-1679

  Garpebring, Anders ^a   Wirestam, Ronnie ^b   Östlund, Nils ^c   Karlsson, Mikael ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

arterial input function; blood flow effects; dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; RF spoiling

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; ERRORS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHARMACOKINETICS;

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; BLOOD FLOW; COEFFICIENT OF VARIATION; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MRI; GRADIENT ECHO SEQUENCES; PHARMACOKINETIC ANALYSIS; PHARMACOKINETIC PARAMETERS; RF SPOILING;

PHANTOMS;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHARMACOKINETICS; RADIOFREQUENCY; RADIOFREQUENCY SPOILING;

EID: 79958266746     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22760     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Yankeelov TE, Gore JC,. Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oncology: theory, data acquisition, analysis, and examples. Curr Med Imaging Rev 2007; 3: 91-107. (Pubitemid 46773870)
2. Jackson A, O'Connor JPB, Parker GJM, Jayson GC,. Imaging tumor vascular heterogeneity and angiogenesis using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 3449-3459. (Pubitemid 46955104)
3. Zahra M, Hollingsworth K, Sala E, Lomas D, Tan L,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as a predictor of tumour response to radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol 2007; 8: 63-74. (Pubitemid 44943092)
4. Cheng HM, Wright GA,. Rapid high-resolution T1 mapping by variable flip angles: accurate and precise measurements in the presence of radiofrequency field inhomogeneity. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 566-574. (Pubitemid 43352555)
5. Donahue KM, Weisskoff R, Burstein D,. Water diffusion and exchange as they influence contrast enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 102-110. (Pubitemid 28365644)
6. Stanisz GJ, Henkelman RM,. Gd-DTPA relaxivity depends on macromolecular content. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 665-667.
7. Schabel MC, Parker DL,. Uncertainty and bias in contrast concentration measurements using spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53: 2345-2373. (Pubitemid 351570916)
8. 1 mapping technique for fast and accurate T1 quantification in contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI. Magn Reson Med 2007; 57: 568-576. (Pubitemid 46385867)
9. Brookes J, Redpath T, Gilbert F, Murray A, Staff R,. Accuracy of T1 measurement in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI using two- and three-dimensional variable flip angle fast low-angle shot. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 163-171. (Pubitemid 29115337)
10. Preibisch C, Deichmann R,. Influence of RF spoiling on the stability and accuracy of T1 mapping based on spoiled FLASH with varying flip angles. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 125-135.
11. 1 measurements using fast steady-state techniques. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 1610-1626.
12. Evelhoch JL,. Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 254-259. (Pubitemid 29463107)
13. Cheng HM,. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 736-743.
14. Parker GJM, Roberts C, Macdonald A, Buonaccorsi GA, Cheung S, Buckley DL, Jackson A, Watson Y, Davies K, Jayson GC,. Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 993-1000. (Pubitemid 44691341)
15. Cheng HM,. T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1-weighted DCE-MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1073-1078.
16. Hyacinthe J-N, Lazeyras F, Ivancevic MK, Zimine I, Vallée J-P, Montet X, Foxall D,. Inflow effect correction in fast gradient-echo perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 885-891. (Pubitemid 37356567)
17. Peeters F, Annet L, Hermoye L, Van Beers BE,. Inflow correction of hepatic perfusion measurements using T1-weighted, fast gradient-echo, contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 710-717. (Pubitemid 38420447)
18. Giovanni PD, Azlan CA, Ahearn TS, Semple SI, Gilbert FJ,. The accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in DCE-MRI of the breast at 3 T. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55: 121-132.
19. Balédent O, Fin L, Khuoy L, Ambarki K, Gauvin A, Gondry-Jouet C, Meyer M,. Brain hydrodynamics study by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial color doppler. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 995-1004. (Pubitemid 44658235)
20. Tain R, Ertl-Wagner B, Alperin N,. Influence of the compliance of the neck arteries and veins on the measurement of intracranial volume change by phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 878-883.
21. Guo J, Kim S, Parker DL, Jeong EK, Zhang L, Roemer RB,. Improved accuracy and consistency in T1 measurement of flowing blood by using inversion recovery GE-EPI. Med Phys 2005; 32: 1083-1093. (Pubitemid 40586794)
22. Batchelor TT, Sorensen AG, di Tomaso E, Zhang W, Duda DG, Cohen KS, Kozak KR, Cahill DP, Chen P, Zhu M, Ancukiewicz M, Mrugala MM, Plotkin S, Drappatz J, Louis DN, Ivy P, Scadden DT, Benner T, Loeffler JS, Wen PY, Jain RK,. AZD2171, a pan-VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, normalizes tumor vasculature and alleviates edema in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Cell 2007; 11: 83-95. (Pubitemid 46075199)
23. Kershaw LE, Buckley DL,. Precision in measurements of perfusion and microvascular permeability with T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 986-992. (Pubitemid 44691340)
24. Roberts C, Issa B, Stone A, Jackson A, Waterton JC, Parker GJM,. Comparative study into the robustness of compartmental modeling and model-free analysis in DCE-MRI studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23: 554-563.
25. Zhu XP, Li KL, Kamaly-Asl ID, Checkley DR, Tessier JJL, Waterton JC, Jackson A,. Quantification of endothelial permeability, leakage space, and blood volume in brain tumors using combined T1 and T2* contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 11: 575-585. (Pubitemid 30350299)
26. Rose CJ, Mills SJ, O'Connor JPB, Buonaccorsi GA, Roberts C, Watson Y, Cheung S, Zhao S, Whitcher B, Jackson A, Parker GJM,. Quantifying spatial heterogeneity in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parameter maps. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 488-499.
27. Naish JH, Kershaw LE, Buckley DL, Jackson A, Waterton JC, Parker GJM,. Modeling of contrast agent kinetics in the lung using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 1507-1514.
28. Harrer JU, Parker GJM, Haroon HA, Buckley DL, Embelton K, Roberts C, Balériaux D, Jackson A,. Comparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20: 748-757. (Pubitemid 39426068)
29. de Lussanet QG, Backes WH, Griffioen AW, Padhani AR, Baeten CI, van Baardwijk A, Lambin P, Beets GL, van Engelshoven JMA, Beets-Tan RGH,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of radiation therapy-induced microcirculation changes in rectal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 63: 1309-1315. (Pubitemid 41628023)
30. Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ,. Handbook of MRI pulse sequences. Elsevier: Burlington, USA; 2004. p 659-678.
31. Gowland PA, Stevenson VL,. T1: the longitudinal relaxation time. In:, Tofts P, editor. Quantitative MRI of the Brain, 1st ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2003. pp 112-141.
32. 0 inhomogeneities measurement of relative flip angles. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 463-468. (Pubitemid 44162796)
33. Tofts PS,. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 91-101. (Pubitemid 28365643)
34. Murase K,. Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 858-862. (Pubitemid 38420465)
35. Duyn JH,. Steady state effects in fast gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37: 559-568. (Pubitemid 27146834)
36. Kershaw LE, Beaumont M, Cheng H-LM,. A general dual-bolus approach for high resolution quantitative DCE-MRI. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Stockholm, Sweden; 2010. p 2753.
37. Köstler H, Ritter C, Lipp M, Beer M, Hahn D, Sandstede J,. Prebolus quantitative MR heart perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 296-299. (Pubitemid 39025273)
38. Kotys MS, Akbudak E, Markham J, Conturo TE,. Precision, signal-to-noise ratio, and dose optimization of magnitude and phase arterial input functions in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 598-611. (Pubitemid 46355423)
39. Henderson E, Sykes J, Drost D, Weinmann HJ, Rutt BK, Lee TY,. Simultaneous MRI measurement of blood flow, blood volume, and capillary permeability in mammary tumors using two different contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 12: 991-1003.
40. Zheng J, Venkatesan R, Haacke EM, Cavagna FM, Finn PJ, Li D,. Accuracy of T1 measurements at high temporal resolution: feasibility of dynamic measurement of blood T1 after contrast administration. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 576-581. (Pubitemid 29468262)