Hsp110 is required for spindle length control

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 198, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 623-636

  Makhnevych, Taras ^a   Wong, Philip ^b   Pogoutse, Oxana ^a   Vizeacoumar, Franco J ^a   Greenblatt, Jack F ^a   Emili, Andrew ^a   Houry, Walid A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b INSTITUTE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 110; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 70; HYDROXYUREA; KINESIN 5;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CENTROMERE; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; CYTOPLASM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; PLASMID; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; YEAST;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; CELLS, CULTURED; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE EXCHANGE FACTORS; HSP110 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; HSP70 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; KINESIN; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; MOLECULAR MOTOR PROTEINS; S PHASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84866395411     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201111105     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Albanèse, V., A.Y. Yam, J. Baughman, C. Parnot, and J. Frydman. 2006. Systems analyses reveal two chaperone networks with distinct functions in eukaryotic cells. Cell. 124:75-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2005.11.039
2. Alberti, S., A.D. Gitler, and S. Lindquist. 2007. A suite of Gateway cloning vectors for high-throughput genetic analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 24:913-919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.1502
3. Allen, J.B., Z. Zhou, W. Siede, E.C. Friedberg, and S.J. Elledge. 1994. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 8:2401-2415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.8.20.2401
4. Andréasson, C., J. Fiaux, H. Rampelt, M.P. Mayer, and B. Bukau. 2008. Hsp110 is a nucleotide-activated exchange factor for Hsp70. J. Biol. Chem. 283:8877-8884. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M710063200
5. Brachmann, C.B., A. Davies, G.J. Cost, E. Caputo, J. Li, P. Hieter, and J.D. Boeke. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast. 14:115-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980130)14:2<115::AID-YEA204>3.0.CO;2-2
6. Costanzo, M., A. Baryshnikova, J. Bellay, Y. Kim, E.D. Spear, C.S. Sevier, H. Ding, J.L. Koh, K. Toufighi, S. Mostafavi, et al. 2010. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science. 327:425-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1180823
7. Daniel, J.A., B.E. Keyes, Y.P. Ng, C.O. Freeman, and D.J. Burke. 2006. Diverse functions of spindle assembly checkpoint genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 172:53-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.105.046441
8. Dorard, C., A. de Thonel, A. Collura, L. Marisa, M. Svrcek, A. Lagrange, G. Jego, K. Wanherdrick, A.L. Joly, O. Buhard, et al. 2011. Expression of a mutant HSP110 sensitizes colorectal cancer cells to chemotherapy and improves disease prognosis. Nat. Med. 17:1283-1289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm.2457
9. Easton, D.P., Y. Kaneko, and J.R. Subjeck. 2000. The hsp110 and Grp1 70 stress proteins: Newly recognized relatives of the Hsp70s. Cell Stress Chaperones. 5:276-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1379/1466-1268(2000) 005<0276:THAGSP>2.0.CO;2
10. Gardner, M.K., D.C. Bouck, L.V. Paliulis, J.B. Meehl, E.T. O'Toole, J. Haase, A. Soubry, A.P. Joglekar, M. Winey, E.D. Salmon, et al. 2008. Chromosome congression by Kinesin-5 motor-mediated disassembly of longer kinetochore microtubules. Cell. 135:894-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.046
11. Gerson-Gurwitz, A., C. Thiede, N. Movshovich, V. Fridman, M. Podolskaya, T. Danieli, S. Lakämper, D.R. Klopfenstein, C.F. Schmidt, and L. Gheber. 2011. Directionality of individual kinesin-5 Cin8 motors is modulated by loop 8, ionic strength and microtubule geometry. EMBO J. 30: 4942-4954. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.403
12. Gong, Y., Y. Kakihara, N. Krogan, J. Greenblatt, A. Emili, Z. Zhang, and W.A. Houry. 2009. An atlas of chaperone-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Implications to protein folding pathways in the cell. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5:275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/msb.2009.26
13. Gupta, M.L. Jr., C.J. Bode, D.A. Thrower, C.G. Pearson, K.A. Suprenant, K.S. Bloom, and R.H. Himes. 2002. beta-Tubulin C354 mutations that severely decrease microtubule dynamics do not prevent nuclear migration in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 13:2919-2932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E02-01-0003
14. He, X., D.R. Rines, C.W. Espelin, and P.K. Sorger. 2001. Molecular analysis of kinetochore-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. Cell. 106: 195-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00438-X
15. Hildebrandt, E.R., and M.A. Hoyt. 2000. Mitotic motors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1496:99-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4889(00)00012-4
16. Hildebrandt, E.R., and M.A. Hoyt. 2001. Cell cycle-dependent degradation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle motor Cin8p requires APC(Cdh1) and a bipartite destruction sequence. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:3402-3416.
17. Ho, A.K., G.A. Raczniak, E.B. Ives, and S.R. Wente. 1998. The integral membrane protein snl1p is genetically linked to yeast nuclear pore complex function. Mol. Biol. Cell. 9:355-373.
18. Hoyt, M.A., L. He, L. Totis, and W.S. Saunders. 1993. Loss of function of Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinesin-related CIN8 and KIP1 is suppressed by KAR3 motor domain mutations. Genetics. 135:35-44.
19. Hu, Y., A. Rolfs, B. Bhullar, T.V. Murthy, C. Zhu, M.F. Berger, A.A. Camargo, F. Kelley, S. McCarron, D. Jepson, et al. 2007. Approaching a complete repository of sequence-verified protein-encoding clones for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res. 17:536-543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.6037607
20. Huang, P., M. Gautschi, W. Walter, S. Rospert, and E.A. Craig. 2005. The Hsp70 Ssz1 modulates the function of the ribosome-associated J-protein Zuo1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12:497-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb942
21. Huh, W.K., J.V. Falvo, L.C. Gerke, A.S. Carroll, R.W. Howson, J.S. Weissman, and E.K. O'Shea. 2003. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature. 425:686-691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02026
22. Janke, C., J. Ortíz, T.U. Tanaka, J. Lechner, and E. Schiebel. 2002. Four new subunits of the Dam1-Duo1 complex reveal novel functions in sister kinetochore biorientation. EMBO J. 21:181-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/21.1.181
23. Kabani, M., J.M. Beckerich, and J.L. Brodsky. 2002. Nucleotide exchange factor for the yeast Hsp70 molecular chaperone Ssa1p. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:4677-4689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.13.4677-4689.2002
24. Kampinga, H.H., and E.A. Craig. 2010. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:579-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2941
25. Khmelinskii, A., C. Lawrence, J. Roostalu, and E. Schiebel. 2007. Cdc14-regulated midzone assembly controls anaphase B. J. Cell Biol. 177:981-993. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200702145
26. Khmelinskii, A., J. Roostalu, H. Roque, C. Antony, and E. Schiebel. 2009. Phosphorylation-dependent protein interactions at the spindle midzone mediate cell cycle regulation of spindle elongation. Dev. Cell. 17:244-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.011
27. Krishnan, V., S. Nirantar, K. Crasta, A.Y. Cheng, and U. Surana. 2004. DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation by regulating spindle behavior. Mol. Cell. 16:687-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.001
28. Krogan, N.J., M. Kim, S.H. Ahn, G. Zhong, M.S. Kobor, G. Cagney, A. Emili, A. Shilatifard, S. Buratowski, and J.F. Greenblatt. 2002. RNA polymerase II elongation factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A targeted proteomics approach. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:6979-6992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.20.6979-6992.2002
29. Krogan, N.J., G. Cagney, H. Yu, G. Zhong, X. Guo, A. Ignatchenko, J. Li, S. Pu, N. Datta, A.P. Tikuisis, et al. 2006. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 440:637-643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04670
30. Lechner, J., and J. Carbon. 1991. A 240 kd multisubunit protein complex, CBF3, is a major component of the budding yeast centromere. Cell. 64:717-725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90501-O
31. Liu, H., F. Liang, F. Jin, and Y. Wang. 2008. The coordination of centromere replication, spindle formation, and kinetochore-microtubule interaction in budding yeast. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000262
32. López-Ribot, J.L., and W.L. Chaffin. 1996. Members of the Hsp70 family of proteins in the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 178:4724-4726.
33. Ma, L., J. McQueen, L. Cuschieri, J. Vogel, and V. Measday. 2007. Spc24 and Stu2 promote spindle integrity when DNA replication is stalled. Mol. Biol. Cell. 18:2805-2816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06-09-0882
34. Makhnevych, T., Y. Sydorskyy, X. Xin, T. Srikumar, F.J. Vizeacoumar, S.M. Jeram, Z. Li, S. Bahr, B.J. Andrews, C. Boone, and B. Raught. 2009. Global map of SUMO function revealed by protein-protein interaction and genetic networks. Mol. Cell. 33:124-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.025
35. Oka, M., M. Nakai, T. Endo, C.R. Lim, Y. Kimata, and K. Kohno. 1998. Loss of Hsp70-Hsp40 chaperone activity causes abnormal nuclear distribution and aberrant microtubule formation in M-phase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 273:29727-29737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.45.29727
36. Peters, J.M. 2002. The anaphase-promoting complex: Proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol. Cell. 9:931-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00540-3
37. Pfund, C., N. Lopez-Hoyo, T. Ziegelhoffer, B.A. Schilke, P. Lopez-Buesa, W.A. Walter, M. Wiedmann, and E.A. Craig. 1998. The molecular chaperone Ssb from Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a component of the ribosomenascent chain complex. EMBO J. 17:3981-3989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.14.3981
38. Polier, S., Z. Dragovic, F.U. Hartl, and A. Bracher. 2008. Structural basis for the cooperation of Hsp70 and Hsp110 chaperones in protein folding. Cell. 133:1068-1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.022
39. Pu, S., J. Wong, B. Turner, E. Cho, and S.J. Wodak. 2009. Up-to-date catalogues of yeast protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37:825-831. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn1005
40. Puig, O., F. Caspary, G. Rigaut, B. Rutz, E. Bouveret, E. Bragado-Nilsson, M. Wilm, and B. Séraphin. 2001. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: A general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods. 24:218-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1183
41. Roostalu, J., C. Hentrich, P. Bieling, I.A. Telley, E. Schiebel, and T. Surrey. 2011. Directional switching of the kinesin Cin8 through motor coupling. Science. 332:94-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1199945
42. Sadlish, H., H. Rampelt, J. Shorter, R.D. Wegrzyn, C. Andréasson, S. Lindquist, and B. Bukau. 2008. Hsp110 chaperones regulate prion formation and propagation in S. cerevisiae by two discrete activities. PLoS ONE. 3:e1763. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001763
43. Sarin, S., K.E. Ross, L. Boucher, Y. Green, M. Tyers, and O. Cohen-Fix. 2004. Uncovering novel cell cycle players through the inactivation of securin in budding yeast. Genetics. 168:1763-1771. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.104.029033
44. Saunders, W., D. Hornack, V. Lengyel, and C.C. Deng. 1997a. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinesin-related motor Kar3p acts at preanaphase spindle poles to limit the number and length of cytoplasmic microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 137:417-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.137.2.417
45. Saunders, W., V. Lengyel, and M.A. Hoyt. 1997b. Mitotic spindle function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a balance between different types of kinesin-related motors. Mol. Biol. Cell. 8:1025-1033.
46. Saunders, W.S., and M.A. Hoyt. 1992. Kinesin-related proteins required for structural integrity of the mitotic spindle. Cell. 70:451-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90169-D
47. Scheufler, C., A. Brinker, G. Bourenkov, S. Pegoraro, L. Moroder, H. Bartunik, F.U. Hartl, and I. Moarefi. 2000. Structure of TPR domainpeptide complexes: Critical elements in the assembly of the Hsp70-Hsp90 multichaperone machine. Cell. 101:199-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80830-2
48. Schuermann, J.P., J. Jiang, J. Cuellar, O. Llorca, L. Wang, L.E. Gimenez, S. Jin, A.B. Taylor, B. Demeler, K.A. Morano, et al. 2008. Structure of the Hsp110:Hsc70 nucleotide exchange machine. Mol. Cell. 31:232-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.006
49. Shaner, L., A. Trott, J.L. Goeckeler, J.L. Brodsky, and K.A. Morano. 2004. The function of the yeast molecular chaperone Sse1 is mechanistically distinct from the closely related hsp70 family. J. Biol. Chem. 279:21992-22001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M313739200
50. Shaner, L., H. Wegele, J. Buchner, and K.A. Morano. 2005. The yeast Hsp110 Sse1 functionally interacts with the Hsp70 chaperones Ssa and Ssb. J. Biol. Chem. 280:41262-41269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M503614200
51. Shirayama, M., W. Zachariae, R. Ciosk, and K. Nasmyth. 1998. The Polo-like kinase Cdc5p and the WD-repeat protein Cdc20p/fizzy are regulators and substrates of the anaphase promoting complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 17:1336-1349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.5.1336
52. Sondermann, H., A.K. Ho, L.L. Listenberger, K. Siegers, I. Moarefi, S.R. Wente, F.U. Hartl, and J.C. Young. 2002. Prediction of novel Bag-1 homologs based on structure/function analysis identifies Snl1p as an Hsp70 co-chaperone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 277:33220-33227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M204624200
53. Sopko, R., D. Huang, N. Preston, G. Chua, B. Papp, K. Kafadar, M. Snyder, S.G. Oliver, M. Cyert, T.R. Hughes, et al. 2006. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol. Cell. 21:319-330. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.12.011
54. The Gene Ontology Consortium. 2000. Gene ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet. 25:25-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/75556
55. Tyson, J.R., and C.J. Stirling. 2000. LHS1 and SIL1 provide a lumenal function that is essential for protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 19:6440-6452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/19.23.6440
56. Tytell, J.D., and P.K. Sorger. 2006. Analysis of kinesin motor function at budding yeast kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 172:861-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200509101
57. van den Bosch, M., and N.F. Lowndes. 2004. Remodelling the Rad9 checkpoint complex: preparing Rad53 for action. Cell Cycle. 3:119-122.
58. Wegele, H., M. Haslbeck, J. Reinstein, and J. Buchner. 2003. Sti1 is a novel activator of the Ssa proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 278:25970-25976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M301548200
59. Wigge, P.A., O.N. Jensen, S. Holmes, S. Souès, M. Mann, and J.V. Kilmartin. 1998. Analysis of the Saccharomyces spindle pole by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry. J. Cell Biol. 141:967-977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.141.4.967
60. Yam, A.Y., V. Albanèse, H.T. Lin, and J. Frydman. 2005. Hsp110 cooperates with different cytosolic HSP70 systems in a pathway for de novo folding. J. Biol. Chem. 280:41252-41261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M503615200
61. Young, J.C. 2010. Mechanisms of the Hsp70 chaperone system. Biochem. Cell Biol. 88:291-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/O09-175