Genetic background affects induced pluripotent stem cell generation

Stem Cell Research and Therapy

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2012, Pages

  Schnabel, Lauren V ^a   Abratte, Christian M ^a   Schimenti, John C ^a   Southard, Teresa L ^a   Fortier, Lisa A ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; DOXYCYCLINE; KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR 4; LENTIVIRUS VECTOR; LEUKEMIA INHIBITORY FACTOR; MYC PROTEIN; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; STAGE SPECIFIC EMBRYO ANTIGEN 1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SOX2;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL ISOLATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SELECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FEMALE; FIBROBLAST; GENETIC DIFFERENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MALE; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; TERATOMA; VIRAL GENE DELIVERY SYSTEM; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; BAGG ALBINO MOUSE; C57BL MOUSE; CELL CULTURE; CYTOLOGY; DBA MOUSE; METABOLISM; NONOBESE DIABETIC MOUSE; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PATHOLOGY; SCID MOUSE; TRANSPLANTATION;

MURINAE; MUS;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; FIBROBLASTS; INDUCED PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, INBRED DBA; MICE, INBRED NOD; MICE, SCID; TERATOMA;

EID: 84866340336     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17576512     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/scrt121     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. A more efficient method to generate integration-free human iPS cells. Okita K, Matsumura Y, Sato Y, Okada A, Morizane A, S Okamoto, Hong H, Nakagawa M, Tanabe K, Tezuka K, Shibata T, Kunisada T, Takahashi M, Takahashi J, Saji H, Yamanaka S, Nat Methods 2011 8 409 412 10.1038/nmeth.1591 21460823
2. Induced pluripotent stem cells: opportunities and challenges. Okita K, Yamanaka S, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011 366 2198 2207 10.1098/rstb.2011.0016 21727125
3. Concise Review: ES vs. iPS Cells; the Game is on. Puri MC, Nagy A, Stem Cells 2011 30 10 14
4. Induced pluripotent stem cells and personalized medicine: current progress and future perspectives. Chun YS, Byun K, Lee B, Anat Cell Biol 2011 44 245 255 10.5115/acb.2011.44.4.245 22254153
5. Culture condition difference for establishment of new embryonic stem cell lines from the C57BL/6 and BALB/c mouse strains. Baharvand H, Matthaei KI, Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2004 40 76 81 10.1290/1543-706X(2004)040<0076: CCDFEO>2.0.CO;2
6. Strain difference in establishment of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines. Kawase E, Suemori H, Takahashi N, Okazaki K, Hashimoto K, Nakatsuji N, Int J Dev Biol 1994 38 385 390 7981049
7. Effect of genetic background on establishment of mouse embryonic stem cells. Suzuki O, Matsuda J, Takano K, Yamamoto Y, Asano T, Naiki M, Kusanagi M, Exp Anim 1999 48 213 216 10.1538/expanim.48.213 10480028
8. Effect of different culture conditions on establishment of embryonic stem cells from BALB/cAJ and NZB/BINJ mice. Iijima S, Tanimoto Y, Mizuno S, Daitoku Y, Kunita S, Sugiyama F, Yagami K, Cell Reprogram 2010 12 679 688 10.1089/cell.2010.0018 20977302
9. In vitro reprograming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Wernig M, Meissner A, Foreman R, Brambrink T, Ku M, Hochedlinger K, Bernstein BE, Jaenisch R, Nature 2007 448 318 324 10.1038/nature05944 17554336
10. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Maherali N, Sridharan R, Xie W, Utikal J, Eminli S, Arnold K, Stadtfeld M, Yachechko R, Tchieu J, Jaenisch R, Plath K, Hochedlinger K, Cell Stem Cell 2007 1 55 70 10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.014 18371336
11. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S, Cell 2006 126 663 676 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 16904174
12. Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors. Okita K, Nakagawa M, Hyenjong H, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S, Science 2008 322 949 953 10.1126/science.1164270 18845712
13. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Okita K, Ichisaka T, Yamanaka S, Nature 2007 448 313 317 10.1038/nature05934 17554338
14. Small RNA-mediated regulation of iPS cell generation. Li Z, Yang CS, Nakashima K, Rana TM, EMBO J 2011 30 823 834 10.1038/emboj.2011.2 21285944
15. Induction and enhancement of cardiac cell differentiation from mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells with cyclosporin-A. Fujiwara M, Yan P. Otsuji TG, Narazaki G, Uosaki H, Fukushima H, Kuwahara K, Harada M, Matsuda H, Matsuoka S, Okita K, Takahashi K, Nakagawa M, Ikeda T, Sakata R, Mummery CL, Nakatsuji N, Yamanaka S, Nakao K, Yamashita JK, PLoS One 2011 6 16734 10.1371/journal.pone.0016734 21364991
16. Reconstitution of the mouse germ cell specification pathway in culture by pluripotent stem cells. Hayashi K, Ohta H, Kurimoto K, Aramaki S, Saitou M, Cell 2011 146 519 532 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.052 21820164
17. Metastable pluripotent states in NOD-mouse-derived ESCs. Hanna J, Markoulaki S, Mitalipova M, Cheng AW, Cassady JP, Staerk J, Carey BW, Lengner CJ, Foreman R, Love J, Gao Q, Kim J, Jaenisch R, Cell Stem Cell 2009 4 513 524 10.1016/j.stem.2009.04.015 19427283
18. Generation of iPS Cells Using a BacMam Multigene Expression System. Takata Y, Kishine H, Sone T, Andoh T, Nozaki M, Poderycki M, Chesnut JD, Imamoto F, Cell Struct Funct 2011 36 209 222 10.1247/csf.11008 21979235
19. Generation of stable pluripotent stem cells from NOD mouse tail-tip fibroblasts. Liu J, Ashton MP, Sumer H, O'Bryan MK, Brodnicki TC, Verma PJ, Diabetes 2011 60 1393 1398 10.2337/db10-1540 21464439
20. Wnt signaling promotes reprograming of somatic cells to pluripotency. Marson A, Foreman R, Chevalier B, Bilodeau S, Kahn M, Young RA, Jaenisch R, Cell Stem Cell 2008 3 132 135 10.1016/j.stem.2008.06.019 18682236
21. Reprograming of murine fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells with chemical complementation of Klf4. Lyssiotis CA, Foreman RK, Staerk J, Garcia M, Mathur D, Markoulaki S, Hanna J, Lairson LL, Charette BD, Bouchez LC, Bollong M, Kunick C, Brinker A, Cho CY, Schultz PG, Jaenisch R, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009 106 8912 8917 10.1073/pnas.0903860106 19447925
22. An efficient SNP system for mouse genome scanning and elucidating strain relationships. Petkov PM, Ding Y, Cassell MA, Zhang W, Wagner G, Sargent EE, Asquith S, Crew V, Johnson KA, Robinson P, Scott VE, Wiles MV, Genome Res 2004 14 1806 1811 10.1101/gr.2825804 15342563
23. On the subspecific origin of the laboratory mouse. Yang H, Bell TA, Churchill GA, Pardo-Manuel de Villena F, Nat Genet 2007 39 1100 1107 10.1038/ng2087 17660819
24. Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation. Keane TM, Goodstadt L, Danecek P, White MA, Wong K, Yalcin B, Heger A, Agam A, Slater G, Goodson M, Furlotte NA, Eskin E, Nellaker C, Whitley H, Cleak J, Janowitz D, Hernandez-Pliego P, Edwards A, Belgard TG, Oliver PL, McIntyre RE, Bhomra A, Nicod J, Gan X, Yuan W, van der Weyden L, Steward CA, Bala S, Stalker J, Mott R, Durbin R, Jackson IJ, Czechanski A, Guerra-Assuncao JA, Donahue LR, Reinholdt LG, Payseur BA, Ponting CP, Birney E, Flint J, Adams DJ, Nature 2011 477 289 294 10.1038/nature10413 21921910
25. The Collaborative Cross at Oak Ridge National Laboratory: developing a powerful resource for systems genetics. Chesler EJ, Miller DR, Branstetter LR, Galloway LD, Jackson BL, Philip VM, Voy BH, Culiat CT, Threadgill DW, Williams RW, Churchill GA, Johnson DK, Manly KF, Mamm Genome 2008 19 382 389 10.1007/s00335-008-9135-8 18716833
26. The collaborative cross: a recombinant inbred mouse population for the systems genetic era. Threadgill DW, Miller DR, Churchill GA, de Villena FP, ILAR J 2011 52 24 31 21411855
27. Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprograming of mouse somatic cells. Brambrink T, Foreman R, Welstead GG, Lengner CJ, Wernig M, Suh H, Jaenisch R, Cell Stem Cell 2008 2 151 159 10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.004 18371436
28. Generating iPS cells from MEFS through forced expression of Sox-2, Oct-4, c-Myc, and Klf4. Welstead GG, Brambrink T, Jaenisch R, J Vis Exp 2008 14 734 doi:10.3791/734
29. Incremental genetic perturbations to MCM2-7 expression and subcellular distribution reveal exquisite sensitivity of mice to DNA replication stress. Chuang CH, Wallace MD, Abratte C, Southard T, Schimenti JC, PLoS Genet 2010 6 1001110 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001110 20838603
30. Differences between cellular and molecular profiles of induced pluripotent stem cells generated from mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Kim EY, Jeon K, Park HY, Han YJ, Yang BC, Park SB, Chung HM, Park SP, Cell Reprogram 2010 12 627 639 10.1089/cell.2010.0013 20958217
31. Assessing self-renewal and differentiation in human embryonic stem cell lines. Cai J, Chen J, Liu Y, Miura T, Luo Y, Loring JF, Freed WJ, Rao MS, Zeng X, Stem Cells 2006 24 516 530 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0143 16293578
32. The transcriptome profile of human embryonic stem cells as defined by SAGE. Richards M, Tan SP, Tan JH, Chan WK, Bongso A, Stem Cells 2004 22 51 64 10.1634/stemcells.22-1-51 14688391
33. Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53-p21 pathway. Hong H, Takahashi K, Ichisaka T, Aoi T, Kanagawa O, Nakagawa M, Okita K, Yamanaka S, Nature 2009 460 1132 1135 10.1038/nature08235 19668191
34. Linking the p53 tumour suppressor pathway to somatic cell reprograming. Kawamura T, Suzuki J, Wang YV, Menendez S, Morera LB, Raya A, Wahl GM, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Nature 2009 460 1140 1144 10.1038/nature08311 19668186
35. P53: Guardian of reprograming. Menendez S, Camus S, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Cell Cycle 2010 9 3887 3891 10.4161/cc.9.19.13301 20948296
36. A high proliferation rate is required for cell reprograming and maintenance of human embryonic stem cell identity. Ruiz S, Panopoulos AD, Herrerias A, Bissig K, Lutz M, Berggren WT, Verma IM, Belmonte JCI, Curr Biol 2011 21 45 52 10.1016/j.cub.2010.11.049 21167714