Embodied language comprehension requires an enactivist paradigm of cognition

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 1, Issue DEC, 2010, Pages

  Van Elk, Michiel ^a,b   Slors, Marc ^c   Bekkering, Harold ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Embodied cognition; Enactivism; Language comprehension; Simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866310401     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00234     Document Type: Article

References (127)

1. Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G., and Iacoboni, M. (2006). Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Curr. Biol. 16, 1818-1823.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 577-609; discussion 610-660.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59, 617-645.
4. Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philos. Trans R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364, 1281-1289.
5. Barsalou, L. W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, A. K., and Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 84-91.
6. Barwise, J., and Perry, J. (1981). Situations and attitudes. J. Philos. 77, 668-691.
7. Barwise, J., and Perry, J. (1983). Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., and Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: position paper. Lang. Learn. 59, 1-27.
9. Bedny, M., Caramazza, A., Grossman, E., Pascual-Leone, A., and Saxe, R. (2008). Concepts are more than percepts: the case of action verbs. J. Neurosci. 28, 11347-11353.
10. Beer, R. (2000). Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 91-99.
11. Bennet, M. R., and Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.
12. Borghi, A. M., and Cimatti, F. (2009). "Words as tools and the problem of abstract word meaning," in Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam.
13. Borghi, A. M., and Cimatti, F. (2010). Embodied cognition and beyond: acting and sensing the body. Neuropsychologia 48, 763-773.
14. Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., and Pulvermuller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cereb. Cortex 19, 1905-1914.
15. Boulenger, V., Silber, B. Y., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Jeannerod, M., and Nazir, T. A. (2008). Subliminal display of action words interferes with motor planning: a combined EEG and kinematic study. J. Physiol. Paris 102, 130-136.
16. Brooks, R. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artif. Intell. 47, 139-159.
17. Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., and Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 24, 355-363.
18. Calvo-Merino, B., Grezes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., and Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Curr. Biol. 16, 1905-1910.
19. Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happe, F., and Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain 125, 1839-1849.
20. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical Embodied Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Clark, A. (1991). An embodied cognitive science? Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 345-351.
22. Clark, A. (1997). Being There. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Clark, A. (2006). Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 370-374.
24. Csibra, G. (2005). Mirror neurons and action observation. Is simulation involved? Interdisciplines. Available at: http://www.interdisciplines.org/mirror/papers/4
25. Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., and Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 122, 371-396.
26. Dennett, D. C. (1969). Content and Consciousness. London: Routledge.
27. Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychol. Rev. 3, 357-370.
28. Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cogn. Sci. 14, 179-211.
29. Elman, J. L. (1995). "Language as a dynamical system," in Mind as Motion, eds R. F. Port and T. van Gelder (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 195-225.
30. Fischer, M. H., and Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Embodied language: a review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 825-850.
31. Fogassi, L., and Gallese, V. (2002). "The neural correlates of action understanding in non-human primates," in Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language, eds M. I. Stamenov and V. Gallese (Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishers), 13-35.
32. Frak, V., Nazir, T., Goyette, M., Cohen, H., and Jeannerod, M. (2010). Grip force is part of the semantic representation of manual action verbs. PLoS ONE 5, e9728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009728
33. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., and Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 13, 361-377.
34. Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Gallagher, S. (2007). Simulation trouble. Soc. Neurosci. 2, 353-365.
36. Gallagher, S., and Zahavi, D. (2008). The Phenomenological Mind. London: Routledge.
37. Gallese, V. (2007). Before and below 'theory of mind': embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Philos. Trans. R Soc.Lond. B Biol. Sci. 362, 659-669.
38. Gallese, V., and Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends Cogn. Sci. 12, 493-501.
39. Gallese, V., and Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: the role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 22, 455-479.
40. Gibbs, R. (2005). Embodiment and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Gibson, J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
42. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behav. Brain Sci. 20, 1-55.
43. Glenberg, A. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 1, 586-596.
44. Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., and Buccino, G. (2008). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 905-919.
45. Glover, S., and Dixon, P. (2002). Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping. Exp. Brain Res. 146, 383-387.
46. Glover, S., Rosenbaum, D. A., Graham, J., and Dixon, P. (2004). Grasping the meaning of words. Exp. Brain Res. 154, 103-108.
47. Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating Minds. The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Mindreading. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Grafton, S. T. (2009). Embodied cognition and the simulation of action to understand others. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1156, 97-117.
49. Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
50. Haken, H., Kelso, J. A. S., and Bunz, H. (1985). A theoretical model of phase transitions in humand hand movements. Biol. Cybern. 51, 347-356.
51. Hauk, O., and Pulvermuller, F. (2004). Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto-central cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 21, 191-201.
52. Heider, F., and Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am. J. Psychol. 57, 243-259.
53. Hoenig, K., Sim, E. J., Bochev, V., Herrnberger, B., and Kiefer, M. (2008). Conceptual flexibility in the human brain: dynamic recruitment of semantic maps from visual, motor, and motion-related areas. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20, 1799-1814.
54. Hurley, S. L. (1998). Consciousness in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. Hutto, D. D. (2005). Knowing what? Radical versus conservative enactivism. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 4, 389-405.
56. Hutto, D. D. (2009). Interaction? Yes. But of what kind and on what basis? Conscious. Cogn. 18, 543-546.
57. Jacob, P. (2008). What do mirror neurons contribute to human social cognition? Mind Lang. 23, 190-223.
58. Jacob, P. (2009). The tuning-fork model of human social cognition: a critique. Conscious. Cogn. 18, 229-243.
59. Jacob, P., and Jeannerod, M. (2005). The motor theory of social cognition: a critique. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 21-25.
60. Kemmerer, D., and Gonzalez-Castillo, J. (2010). The two-level theory of verb meaning: an approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system. Brain Lang. 112, 54-76.
61. Koelewijn, T., van Schie, H. T., Bekkering, H., Oostenveld, R., and Jensen, O. (2008). Motor-cortical beta oscillations are modulated by correctness of observed action. Neuroimage 40, 767-775.
62. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
63. Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J. M., Girardi, G., and Bekkering, H. (2007). Getting a grip on numbers: numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 33, 1400-1409.
64. Lindemann, O., Stenneken, P., van Schie, H. T., and Bekkering, H. (2006). Semantic activation in action planning. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 32, 633-643.
65. Mahon, B. Z., and Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. J. Physiol. Paris 102, 59-70.
66. Mahon, B. Z., and Caramazza, A. (2009). Concepts and categories: a cognitive neuropsychological perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 27-51.
67. Martin, A., Wiggs, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., and Haxby, J. V. (1996). Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379, 649-652.
68. Meier, B. P., Hauser, D. J., Robinson, M. D., Friesen, C. K., and Schjeldahl, K. (2007). What's "up" with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93, 699-710.
69. Moyer, R. S., and Landauer, T. K. (1967). Time required for judgments of numerical inequality. Nature 215, 1519-1520.
70. Nazir, T. A., Boulenger, V., Roy, A., Silber, B., Jeannerod, M., and Paulignan, Y. (2008). Language-induced motor perturbations during the execution of a reaching movement. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 933-943.
71. Newman-Norlund, R. D., van Schie, H. T., van Zuijlen, A. M., and Bekkering, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 817-818.
72. Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. O'Regan, J. K., and Noe, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 939-973; discussion 973-1031.
74. Oliveri, M., Finocchiaro, C., Shapiro, K., Gangitano, M., Caramazza, A., and Pascual-Leone, A. (2004). All talk and no action: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study of motor cortex activation during action word production. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 374-381.
75. Papeo, L., Vallesi, A., Isaja, A., and Rumiati, R. I. (2009). Effects of TMS on different stages of motor and non-motor verb processing in the primary motor cortex. PLoS ONE 4, e4508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004508
76. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., and Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying different-modality properties for concepts produces switching costs. Psychol. Sci. 14, 119-124.
77. Pollack, J. B. (1991). The induction of dynamical recognizers. Mach. Learn. 7, 227-252.
78. Port, R. F. (2003). Meter and speech. J. Phon. 31, 599-611.
79. Port, R. F., Cummins, F., and McAuley, J. D. (1995). "Naive time, temporal patterns and human audition," in Mind as Motion, eds R. F. Port and T. van Gelder (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 339-371.
80. Postle, N., McMahon, K. L., Ashton, R., Meredith, M., and de Zubicaray, G. I. (2008). Action word meaning representations in cytoarchitectonically defined primary and premotor cortices. Neuroimage 43, 634-644.
81. Prinz, J. (2002). Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and their Perceptual Basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
82. Pulvermuller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 576-582.
83. Pulvermuller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., and Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. Eur. J. Neurosci. 21, 793-797.
84. Pulvermuller, F., Shtyrov, Y., and Ilmoniemi, R. (2005). Brain signatures of meaning access in action word recognition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 884-892.
85. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R., and Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Hum. Move.Sci. 26, 867-891.
86. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., and Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 3, 131-141.
87. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., and Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 661-670.
88. Rowlands, M. (2006). Body Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
89. Rueschemeyer, S. A., Pfeiffer, C. and Bekkering, H. (2010). Body schematics: on the role of the body schema in embodied lexical-semantic representations. Neuropsychologia 48, 774-781.
90. Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson House.
91. Saxe, R. (2005). Against simulation: the argument from error. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 174-179.
92. Saxe, R. (2009). The neural evidence for simulation is weaker than I think you think it is. Philos. Stud. 144, 447-456.
93. Schank, R. C., and Abelson, R. J. (1977). Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
94. Schmidt, R. C., Carello, C., and Turvey, M. T. (1990). Phase transitions and critical fluctuations in the visual coordination of rhythmic movements between people. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 16, 227-247.
95. Schoner, G., and Kelso, J. A. (1988). Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. Science 239, 1513-1520.
96. Schubert, T. W. (2005). Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89, 1-21.
97. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
98. Searle, J. R. (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99. Slors, M. V. P. (2009). Neural resonance: between implicit simulation and social perception. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 9, 437-458.
100. Stapel, J. C., Hunnius, S., van Elk, M., and Bekkering, H. (2010). Motor activation during observation of unusual vs. ordinary actions in infancy. Soc. Neurosci. 5, 451-460.
101. Stephen, D. G., Boncoddo, R. A., Magnuson, J. S., and Dixon, J. A. (2009a). The dynamics of insight: mathematical discovery as a phase transition. Mem Cogn. 37, 1132-1149.
102. Stephen, D. G., Dixon, J. A., and Isenhower, R. W. (2009b). Dynamics of representational change: entropy, action, and cognition. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 35, 1811-1832.
103. Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P., Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., Cappa, S. F., and Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 273-281.
104. Thelen, E. (1994). Three-month old infants can learn task-specific patterns of interlimb coordination. Psychol. Sci. 5, 280-285.
105. Thelen, E., Schoner, G., Scheier, C., and Smith, L. B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: a field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 1-34; discussion 34-86.
106. Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107. Tomasino, B., Fink, G. R., Sparing, R., Dafotakis, M., and Weiss, P. H. (2008). Action verbs and the primary motor cortex: a comparative TMS study of silent reading, frequency judgments, and motor imagery. Neuropsychologia 46, 1915-1926.
108. Toni, I., de Lange, F. P., Noordzij, M. L., and Hagoort, P. (2008). Language beyond action. J. Physiol. Paris 102, 71-79.
109. van Dam, W. O., Rueschemeyer, S.-A., and Bekkering, H. (2010). Context effects in embodied lexical-semantic processing. Front. Psychol. 1:150. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00150
110. van Dantzig, S., Pecher, D., and Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Approach and avoidance as action effects. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 61, 1298-1306.
111. van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., and Bekkering, H. (2008). Semantics in action: an electrophysiological study on the use of semantic knowledge for action. J. Physiol. Paris 102, 95-100.
112. van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., and Bekkering, H. (2009a). Action semantic knowledge about objects is supported by functional motor activation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 35, 1118-1128.
113. van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., and Bekkering, H. (2009b). Short-term action intentions overrule long-term semantic knowledge. Cognition 111, 72-83.
114. van Elk, M., van Schie, H. T., Zwaan, R. A., and Bekkering, H. (2010). The functional role of motor activation in language processing: motor cortical oscillations support lexical-semantic retrieval. Neuroimage 50, 665-677.
115. van Rooij, I., Bongers, R. M., and Haselager, W. F. G. (2002). A non-representational approach to imagined action. Cogn. Sci. 26, 345-375.
116. van Schie, H. T., Wijers, A. A., Kellenbach, M. L., and Stowe, L. A. (2003). An event-related potential investigation of the relationship between semantic and perceptual levels of representation. Brain Lang. 86, 300-325.
117. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., and Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
118. Walsh, V. (2003). A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7, 483-488.
119. Ward, R. (2009). Representation in dynamical agents. Neural Netw. 22, 258-266.
120. Willems, R. M., Toni, I., Hagoort, P., and Casasanto, D. (2010). Neural dissociations between action verb understanding and motor imagery. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 2387-2400.
121. Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
122. Yaxley, R. H., and Zwaan, R. A. (2007). Simulating visibility during language comprehension. Cognition 105, 229-236.
123. Zahavi, D. (2008). Simulation, projection and empathy. Conscious Cogn. 17, 514-522.
124. Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Mental simulation in language comprehension and social cognition. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 39, 1142-1150.
125. Zwaan, R. A., and Kaschak, M. P. (2009). "Language comprehension as a means of 're-situating' oneself," in The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, eds M. P. Robbins and M. Aydede (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 368-381.
126. Zwaan, R. A., and Madden, C. J. (2005). "Embodied sentence comprehension," in Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language, and Thinking, eds D. Pecher and R. A. Zwaan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 224-245.
127. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., and Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychol Sci. 13, 168-171.