User-experience from an inference perspective

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Van Schaik, Paul ^a   Hassenzahl, Marc ^b   Ling, Jonathan ^c  

^a TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Folkwang University   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SUNDERLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Beauty; Inference perspective; Model; User experience

Indexed keywords

AESTHETICS; BEAUTY; HANDS-ON EXPERIENCES; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; INFERENCE MODELS; INFERENCE PERSPECTIVE; INFERENCE PROCESS; INFORMATION SOURCES; UNIFIED FRAMEWORK; USER-EXPERIENCE;

MODELS;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 84866307426     PISSN: 10730516     EISSN: 15577325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2240156.2240159     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. APTER, M. J. 1989. Reversal Theory: Motivation, Emotion and Personality. Taylor & Frances/Routledge, Florence, KY.
2. BARRON, G. AND LEIDNER, B. 2010. The role of experience in the Gambler's Fallacy. J. Behav. Decis. Making 23, 117-129.
3. BLOCH, P. H., BRUNEL, F. F., AND ARNOLD, T. J. 2003. Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: Concept and measurement. J. Consum. Resear. 29, 551-565.
4. CHATER, N. AND BROWN, G. D. A. 2008. From universal laws of cognition to specific cognitive models. Cogn. Sci. Multidisc J. 32, 36-67.
5. CHATER, N., OAKSFORD, M., NAKISA, R., AND REDINGTON, M. 2003. Fast, frugal, and rational: How rational norms explain behavior. Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Proc. 90, 63-86.
6. CHERNEV, A. AND CARPENTER, G. S. 2001. The role of market efficiency intuitions in consumer choice: A case of compensatory inferences. J. Market. Resear. 38, 349-361.
7. CHIN, W. W. 2010. How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications in Marketing and Related Fields, V. E. Vinzi,W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang Eds., Springer, Berlin, 655-690.
8. CYR, D., HEAD, M., AND IVANOV, A. 2006. Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce. Inf. Manage. 43, 950-963.
9. DION, K., BERSCHEID, E., AND WALSTER, E. 1972. What is beautiful is good. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 24, 285-290.
10. FINNERAN, C. M. AND ZHANG, P. 2003. A person-artefact-task (PAT) model of flow antecedences in computer-mediated environments. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 59, 475-496.
11. FORD, G. T. AND SMITH, R. A. 1987. Inferential beliefs in consumer evaluations: An assessment of alternative processing strategies. J. Consum. Resear. 14, 363-371.
12. GIGERENZER, G. AND GAISSMAIER, W. 2011. Heuristic decision making. Ann. Rev. Psych. 62, 451-482.
13. GWIZDKA, J. AND SPENCE, I. 2006. What can searching behavior tell us about the difficulty of information tasks? A study of web navigation. In Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
14. HARTMANN, J., SUTCLIFFE, A., AND DE ANGELI, A. 2008. Towards a theory of user judgment of aesthetics and user interface quality. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 15, 15.
15. HASSENZAHL, M. 2001. The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. Int. J. Hum.- Comput. Interact. 13, 481-499.
16. HASSENZAHL, M. 2003. The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. Monk, and P. Wright Eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, 31-42.
17. HASSENZAHL, M. 2008. Aesthetics in interactive products: Correlates and consequences of beauty. In Product Experience, R. Schifferstein and P. Hekkert Eds., Elsevier, 287-302.
18. HASSENZAHL, M. 2010. Experience design: Technology for All the Right Reasons. Morgan and Claypool, San Rafael, CA.
19. HASSENZAHL, M. AND MONK, A. F. 2007. Was uns Schönheit signalisiert. Zum Zusammenhang von Schönheit, wahrgenommener Gebrauchstauglichkeit und hedonischen Qualit äten [What beauty signals to us. About the association between beauty, perceived usability and hedonic quality]. In Prospektive Gestaltung von Mensch-Technik-Interaktion. 7. Berliner Werkstatt Mensch-Maschine-Systeme, M. Rötting, G. Wozny, A. Klostermann, and J. Hus Eds., VDI, Düsseldorf, 227-232.
20. HASSENZAHL, M. AND MONK, A. 2010. The inference of perceived usability from beauty. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 25, 235-260.
21. HASSENZAHL, M. AND ULLRICH, D. 2007. To do or not to do: Differences in user experience and retrospective judgments depending on the presence or absence of instrumental goals. Interact. Comput. 19, 429-437.
22. HASSENZAHL, M., PLATZ, A., BURMESTER, M., AND LEHNER, K. 2000. Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, 201-208.
23. HASSENZAHL, M., DIEFENBACH, S., AND G ÖRITZ, A. 2010. Needs, affect, and interactive products - Facets of user experience. Interact. Comput 22, 353-362.
24. HENSELER, J., RINGLE, C., AND SINKOVICS, R. 2009. The use of partial least squares modeling in international marketing. In New Challenges in International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing), T. Cavusgil, R. Sinkovicks, and P. Ghauri Eds., Emerald, London, 277-319.
25. HERTWIG, R., BARRON, G.,WEBER, E. U., AND EREV, I. 2004. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psych. Sci. 15, 534-539.
26. HULLAND, J., RYAN, M., AND RAYNER, R. 2010. Modeling customer satisfaction: A comparative evaluation of covariance structure analysis versus partial least squares. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications in Marketing and Related Fields, V. E. Vinzi,W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang Eds., Springer, 307-325.
27. JACOBSEN, T. 2004. Individual and group modelling of aesthetic judgment strategies. Brit. J. Psych. 95, 41-56.
28. KARDES, F. R., CRONLEY, M. L., KELLARIS, J. J., AND POSAVAC, S. S. 2004a. The role of selective information processing in price-quality inference. J. Consum. Resear. 31, 368-374.
29. KARDES, F. R., POSAVAC, S. S., AND CRONLEY, M. L. 2004b. Consumer inference: A review of processes, bases, and judgment contexts. J. Consum. Psych. 14, 230-256.
30. KEENEY, R. L. AND RAIFFA, H. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
31. KRUGLANSKI, A. W. AND GIGERENZER, G. 2011. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Psych. Rev. 118, 97-109.
32. KRUGLANSKI, A. W., PIERRO, A., MANNETTI, L., ERB, H., AND CHUN, W. Y. 2007. On the parameters of human judgment. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol 39, M. P. Zanna Ed., Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 255-303.
33. LAVIE, T. AND TRACTINSKY, N. 2004. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 60, 269-298.
34. LINGLE, J. H. AND OSTROM, T. M. 1979. Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 37, 180-194.
35. LOKEN, B. 2006. Consumer psychology: Categorization, inferences, affect, and persuasion. In Annual Review of Psychology, Vol 57, D. L. Schacter Ed., Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, CA. 453-485.
36. MONK, A. F. 2004. The product as a fixed-effect fallacy. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 19, 371-375.
37. OOSTENDORP, H. V., MADRID, R. I., AND PUERTA MELGUIZO, M. C. 2009. The effect of menu type and task complexity on information retrieval performance. The Ergon. Open J. 2, 64-71.
38. RAJAGOPAL, P. AND MONTGOMERY, N. V. 2011. I imagine, I experience, I like. J. Consum. Resear. 38, 578-594.
39. RINGLE, C., WENDE, S., AND WILL, A. 2005. SmartPLS 2.0. Institute of Operations Management and Organizations, University of Hamburg, Germany.
40. THORNDIKE, E. L. 1920. A constant error on psychological rating. J. Appl. Psych. 4, 25-29.
41. TRACTINSKY, N., COKHAVI, A., KIRSCHENBAUM, M., AND SHARFI, T. 2006. Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 64, 1071-1083.
42. VAN SCHAIK, P. AND LING, J. 2009. The role of context in perceptions of the aesthetics of web pages over time. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 67, 79-89.
43. VAN SCHAIK, P. AND LING, J. 2011. An integrated model of interaction experience for information retrieval in a Web-based encyclopaedia. Interact. Comput. 23, 18-32.
44. VAN SCHAIK, P. AND LING, J. (To appear). An experimental analysis of experiential and cognitive variables in web navigation. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 26.
45. VENKATESH, V., MORRIS, M. G., DAVIS, G. B., AND DAVIS, F. D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425-478.
46. VILARES, M., ALMEIDA, M., AND COELHO, P. 2010. Comparison of likelihood and PLS estimators for structural equation modeling: A simulation with customer satisfaction data. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications in Marketing and Related Fields, V. E. Vinzi,W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang Eds., Springer, 289-305.
47. VINZI, V. E., CHIN, W. W., HENSELER, J., AND WANG, H. Eds. 2010. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications in Marketing and Related Fields. Springer.
48. WOOTEN, D. B. AND REED, A. 1998. Informational influence and the ambiguity of product experience: Order effects on the weighting of evidence. J. Consum. Psych. 7, 79-99.
49. YEUNG, C. W. M. AND WYER, J. 2004. Affect, appraisal, and consumer Judgment. J. Consum. Resear. 31, 412-424.