Web 2.0 and learning: A closer look at transactional control model in e-learning

Educational Social Software for Context-Aware Learning: Collaborative Methods and Human Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 23-37

  Olaniran, Bolanle A ^a   Williams, Indi M ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866248949     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-826-0.ch002     Document Type: Chapter

References (49)

1. Achterman, D. (2006). Beyond wikipedia. Teacher Librarian, 34(2), 19-22.
2. Anderson, J. (1995). Cybarites, knowledge workers and the new Creoles on the superhighway. Anthropology Today, 11(4), 13-15.
3. Anderson, T. (2007, June). Book review-control and constraint in e-learning: Choosing when to choose. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2), 1-3.
4. Berg, J., Berquam, L., & Christoph, K. (2007, March/April). Social networking technologies: A "poke" for campus services. EDUCAUSE Review, 42(2), 32-44.
5. Cameron, D., & Anderson, T. (2006). Comparing weblogs to threaded discussion tools in online educational contexts. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 3(11), 3-15.
6. Clark, R. E. (1982). Antagonism between achievement and enjoyment in ATI studies. Educational Psychologist, 17, 92-101.
7. Clark, R. E. (1989). When teaching kills learning: Research on mathematics. In H. N. Mandl, N. Bennett, E. de Corte, & H. F. Freidrich (Eds.), Learning and instruction: European research in an international context (Vol. 2, pp. 1-22). London: Pergamon.
8. Dalsgaard, C. (2006). Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-learning. Retrieved on January 3, 2009 from [REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD] http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Christian_Dalsgaard.htm
9. Dron, J. (2006). The teacher, the learner, and the collective mind. AI & Society, 21(1), 200-216. doi:10.1007/s00146-005-0031-4
10. Dron, J. (2007). Designing the undesignable: Social software and control. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 60-71.
11. st century. A framework for research and practice. New York: Routledgefalmer.
12. He, K. K., & Yu, S. Q. (2005). The education innovating in information age. Basic Education Reference, 5, 1-6.
13. Heaton, L. (1998). Preserving communication context: Virtual workspace and interpersonal space in Japanese CSCW. In C. Ess & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Cultural attitudes towards communication and technology (pp. 163-186). Australia: University of Sydney.
14. Henning, E. (2003). I click therefore I am (not): Is cognition 'distributed' or is it 'contained' in boderless e-learning programmes? International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 303-317. doi:10.1046/j.1360-3736.2003.00188.x
15. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Jakes, D. (2006). Wild about wikis: Tools for taking students and teacher collaboration to the next level. Technology and Learning, 27(1), 6.
17. Jarvis, P. (2000). Globalisation, the learning society, and comparative education. Comparative Education, 36(3), 343-355. doi:10.1080/713656613
18. Kamel Boulos, M., & Wheeler, S. (2007, March). The emerging Web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and healthcare education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24(1), 2-23. doi:10.1111/j.14711842.2007.00701.x
19. Kenney, B. (2007, January). You 2.0. School Library Journal, 53(1), 11.
20. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
21. Lashinsky, A. (2005). Facebook stares down success. Fortune, 152, 40.
22. Levy, S. (2007, August 20). Facebook grows up. Newsweek, 8, 40-46.
23. Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I'll see you on Facebook: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1-17. doi:10.1080/03634520601009710
24. Mejias, U. (2005). A nomad's guide to learning and social software. The Knowledge Tree. Retrieved on October 20, 2007, from http://knowledgetree.flexiblelearning.net.au/edition07/html/la_mejias.html
25. Mejias, U. (2007). Teaching social software with social software. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 2(5). Retrieved on December 2, 2007, from http://www.innovateonline.ifo/index.php?view=article&id=260
26. O'Reilly, T. (2005). Compact definition. O'Reilly radar. Retrieved on November 15, 2007, from [REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD] http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/10/web_20_compact_definition.html
27. Olaniran, B. A. (2001). The effects of computermediated communication on transculturalism. In V. Milhouse, M. Asante & P. Nwosu (Eds.), Transcultural realities (pp. 83-105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Olaniran, B. A. (2004a). Computer-mediated communication as an instructional learning tool: Course evaluation with communication students. In P. Comeaux (Ed.), Assessing online teaching & learning (pp. 144-158).
29. Olaniran, B. A. (2004b). Computer-mediated communication in cross-cultural virtual groups. In G. M. Chen & W. J. Starosta (Eds.), Dialogue among diversities (pp. 142-166). Washington, D.C.: National Communication Association.
30. Olaniran, B. A. (2006). Applying synchronous computer-mediated communication into course design: Some consideration and practical guides. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 23(3), 210-220. doi:10.1108/10650740610674210
31. Olaniran, B. A. (2007a). Challenges to implementing e-learning and lesser developed countries. In A. Edmundson (Ed.), Globalized e-learning cultural challenges. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
32. Olaniran, B. A. (2007b). Culture and communication challenges in virtual workspaces. In K. St-Amant (Ed.), Linguistic and cultural online communication issues in the global age (pp. 79-92). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
33. Olaniran, B. A., Savage, G. T., & Sorenson, R. L. (1996). Experiential and experimental approaches to face-to-face and computer mediated communication in group discussion. Communication Education, 45, 244-259. doi:10.1080/03634529609379053
34. Picciano, A. G. (2001). Distance learning: Making connections across virtual space and time. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
35. Poftak, A. (2006). Community 2.0. Technology & Learning, 27(144). Retrieved on October 31, 2007, from http://newfirstsearch.oclc.org/images/WSPL/wsppdf1/HTML/00427/2VVDD/1SW.HTM
36. Read, B. (2006). A week of change at Facebook, as it expands its membership. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(5), A35-A35.
37. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
38. Richardson, W. (2007). Teaching in a Web 2.0 world. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 43(4), 150-151.
39. Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2002). Exploring social presence in computer conferencing. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13(3), 259-275.
40. Selinger, M. (2004). Cultural and pedagogical implications of a global e-learning programme. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(2), 223-239. doi:10.1080/03057640410001700589
41. nd ed., pp. 187-219). Boston: Academic Press.
42. Shirky, C. (1998). And nothing to watch: Bad protocols, good users: In praise of evolvable systems. [-ff.] AMC Net Worker, 2(3), 48.
43. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunication. London: Wiley.
44. Squires, D. (1999). Educational software and learning: Subversive use and volatile design. Retrieved on December 10, 2007, from http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/199/0001/01/00011079.pdf
45. Varela De Freitas, C., & Valente, L. (2001). Uses of Internet in Portugal. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(4), 117-120. doi:10.1007/BF02504953
46. Vasileva, J. (2004, August 30-September 3). Harnessing P2P power in the classroom. Paper presented at the ITS 2004, Maceio, Brazil.F
47. Wang, M. (2007). Designing online courses that effectively engage learners from diverse cultural backgrounds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 294-311. doi:10.1111/j.14678535.2006.00626.x
48. Waterhouse, S. (2005). The power of e-learning: The essential guide for teaching in the digital age. Boston: Pearson.
49. Wilson, B. (1995). Metaphors for instruction: Why we talk about learning environments. Educational Technology, 35(5), 25-30.