Correlating cellulose derivative intrinsic viscosity with mechanical susceptibility of swollen hydrophilic matrix tablets

AAPS PharmSciTech

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 903-910

  Klančar, Uroš ^a   Horvat, Matej ^a   Baumgartner, Saša ^b  

^a Lek dd   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

dissolution; HPC; HPMC; hydrophilic matrices; intrinsic viscosity; mechanical susceptibility

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE DERIVATIVE; INDAPAMIDE; POLYMER;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISSOLUTION; DRUG RELEASE; HYDROPHILIC MATRIX TABLET; IN VITRO STUDY; MATRIX TABLET; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

CELLULOSE; CHEMISTRY, PHARMACEUTICAL; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; POLYMERS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TABLETS; VISCOSITY;

EID: 84866116459     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15309932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-012-9811-6     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Liu P, Ju T, Qiu Y. Diffusion-controlled drug delivery systems. In: Li X, Jasti BR, editors. Design of controlled release drug delivery systems. United States: McGraw-Hill; 2006. p. 107-37.
2. Wang Z, Shmeis RA. Dissolution controlled drug delivery systems. In: Li X, Jasti BR, editors. Design of controlled release drug delivery systems. United States: McGraw-Hill; 2006. p. 139-72.
3. Siepmann J, Peppas NA. Hydrophilic matrices for controlled drug delivery: an improved mathematical model to predict the resulting drug release kinetics (the Sequential Layer model). Pharm Res. 2000;17(10):1290-8.
4. Baumgartner S, Kristl J, Peppas N. Network structure of cellulose ethers used in pharmaceutical applications during swelling and at equilibrium. Pharm Res. 2002;19:1084-90.
5. 1H NMR spectroscopy. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2002;3(4):E36.
6. 1H NMR and MRI methods. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2005;59:299-306.
7. McConnell EL, Fadda HM, Basit AW. Gut instincts: explorations in intestinal physiology and drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2008;364:213-26.
8. Abrahamsson B, Alpsten M, Bakec B, Larsson A, Sjoegren J. In vitro and in vivo erosion of two different hydrophilic gel matrix tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1998;46:69-75.
9. Mudie DM, Amidon GL, Amidon GE. Physiological parameters for oral delivery and in vitro testing. Mol Pharm. 2010;7(5):1388-405.
10. Weitschies W, Blume H, Mönnikes H. Magnetic marker monitoring: high resolution real-time tracking of oral solid dosage forms in the gastrointestinal tract. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010;74:93-101.
11. Goodman K, Hodges LA, Band J, Stevens HNE, Weitschies W, Wilson CG. Assessing gastrointestinal motility and disintegration profiles of magnetic tablets by a novel magnetic imaging device and gamma scintigraphy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010;74:84-92.
12. Kamba M, Seta Y, Kusai A, Nishimura K. Comparison of the mechanical destructive force in the small intestine of dog and human. Int J Pharm. 2002;237:139-49.
13. Abrahamsson B, Albery T, Eriksson A, Gustafsson I, Sjoberg M. Food effects on tablet disintegration. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2004;22:165-72.
14. Abrahamsson B, Pal A, Sjoberg AM, Carlsson M, Laurell E, Brasseur JG. A novel in vitro and numerical analysis of shear-induced drug release from extended-release tablets in the fed stomach. Pharm Res. 2005;22:1215-26.
15. Sako K, Sawada T, Nakashima H, Yokohama S, Sonobe T. Influence of water soluble fillers in hydroxypropylmethylcellulose matrices on in vitro and in vivo drug release. J Con Rel. 2002;81:165-72.
16. Garbacz G, Wedemeyer R, Nagel S, Giessmann T, Mönnike H, Wilson CG, Siegmund W, Weitschies W. Irregular absorption profiles observed from diclofenac extended release tablets can be predicted using a dissolution test apparatus that mimics in vivo physical stresses. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008;70:421-8.
17. Campos-Aldrete ME, Villafuerte-Robles L. Influence of the viscosity grade and the particle size of HPMC on metronidazole release from matrix tablet. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1997;43:173-8.
18. Patel VF, Patel NM. Statistical evaluation of influence of viscosity and content of polymer on dipyridamole release from floating matrix tablets: a technical note. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2007;8(3):E69.
19. Mitchell SA, Balwinski KM. A framework to investigate drug release variability arising from hypromellose viscosity specifications in controlled release matrix tablets. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97:2277-85.
20. Fettaka M, Issaadi R, Moulai-Mostefa N, Dez I, Le Cerf D, Picton L. Thermo sensitive behavior of cellulose derivatives in dilute aqueous solutions: From macroscopic to mesoscopic scale. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;357(2):372-8.
21. Hiemenz PC, Lodge TP. Polymer Chemistry, Second Edition. Florida: CRC, Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton. 2007; p. 338-339.
22. Feller RM, Wilt M. Evaluation of Cellulose Ethers for Conservation. The Getty Conservation Institute. 1990. http://www.getty.edu/conservation/ publications-resources/pdf-publications/ethers.pdf. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
23. USP-NF Online. US Pharmacopoeia, Rockville. http://www.uspnf.com. Accessed 7 Oct 2011.
24. R Development Core Team. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2010. http://www.r-project.org. Accessed 16 Dec 2011.
25. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA. Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm. 1983;15:25-35.