Two approaches to phonics instruction: Comparison of effects with children with significant cognitive disability

Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 269-279

  Finnegan, Elizabeth Grace ^a  

^a St Thomas Aquinas College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84866000705     PISSN: 21541647     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Agran, M., Alper, S., & Wehmeyer, M. (2002). Access to general curriculum for students with significant disabilities: What it means to teachers? Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 37, 123-133. (Pubitemid 44111969)
2. Allor, J. H., Mathes, P. G., Roberts, J. K.,Jones, F. G., & Champlin, T. M. (2010). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disabilities to read: An experimental examination of a comprehensive reading intervention. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 3-22.
3. Barbetta, P. M., Heward, W. L., & Bradley, D. M. (1993). Relative effects of whole-word and phonetic-prompt error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of sight words by students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 99-100.
4. Bradford, S., Shippen, M. E., Alberto, P., Houchins, D. E., & Flores, M. (2006). Using systematic instruction to teach decoding skills to middle school students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 41, 333-343. (Pubitemid 44832355)
5. Browder, D. M., Fallin, K., Davis, S., & Karvonen, M. (2003). Consideration of what may influence student outcomes on alternate assessment. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 255-270.
6. Browder, D., & Xin, Y. (1998). A meta-analysis and review of sight word research and its implications for teaching functional reading to individuals with moderate and severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 130-153.
7. Chali, J. (1996). Learning to read. The great debate. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace & Company.
8. Conners, F. A., Atwell, J. A., Rosenquist, C. J., & Sligh, A. C. (2001). Abilities underlying decoding differences in children with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 45, 292-299. (Pubitemid 32734355)
9. Dolch, E. (1948). Problems in reading. Gerrard Press.
10. Dolch, E. W., & Bloomster, M. (1937). Phonic readiness. Elementary School Journal, 38, 201-205.
11. nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Edmark Corporation.
12. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, SA., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71, 393-447. (Pubitemid 33402449)
13. Flores, M. M., Shippen, M. E., Alberto, P., & Crowe, L. (2004). Teaching letter-sound correspondence to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Journal of Direct Instruction 4, 173-188.
14. Flowers, C., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Browder, D., & Spooner, F. (2005). Teacher's perceptions of alternate assessment. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30, 81-92.
15. th ed). San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Hoover, W., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127-160.
17. Individual with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, 20 U.S.CA. §1400 et seq.
18. Joseph, L. M., & Seery, M. E. (2004). Where is the phonics? A review of the literature on the use of phonetic analysis with students with mental retardation. Remedial and Spedal Education, 25, 88-94. (Pubitemid 38483205)
19. Juel, C., Paratore, J. R., & Simmons, D. (2008). My sidewalks. Lebanon, IN: Pearson.
20. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1985). Kaufman test of educational achievement. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
21. Kliewer, C., & Bilden, D. (2001). "School's not really a place for reading": A research synthesis of the literate lives of students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 1-12.
22. Kliewer, C., & Landis, D. (1999). Individualizing literacy instruction for young children with moderate to severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 66, 85-100.
23. Mathes, P. G., & Torgesen, J. K. (2005). Early Interventions in Reading Level 1. Columbus, OH: SRAMcGraw-Hill.
24. Mercer, C., Rudolph, M., & Wilson, R. (1998). Merrill Reading Series. Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
25. National Reading Panel. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26. Nietupski.J., Nietupski, S., Curtin, S., & Shrikanth, K. (1997). A review of curricular research in severe disabilities from 1976 to 1995 in six selected journals. The Journal of Special Education, 33( 1), 36-55.
27. Quigley, S. P., McAnally, P. L., Rose, S., & King, C. M. (2001). Reading milestones. Austin, TX: PROEd.
28. Schrank. F. A., Mather, N., & Woodcock, R. W. (2004). Woodcock-Johnson III diagnosticreading battery. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.
29. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). The test of word reading efficiency. Austin, TX: PRO-Ed.
30. Wagner, R., Torgesen, J., & Rashotte, C. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: PRO-Ed.
31. Waugh, R. E., Fredrick, L. D., & Alberto, P. (2009). Using simultaneous prompting to teach sounds and blending skills to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 1435-1447.
32. Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler individual achievement test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
33. Wilson, B. (n.d.) Wilson reading system. Oxford, MA: Wilson Language Training
34. Winzer, M. A. (1993). The history of special education. From isolation to integration. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
35. Woodcock, R. W. (1991). Woodcock language proficiency battery-revised. Itsaca, IL: Riverside.