Molecular evolution and diversification of the moss family Daltoniaceae (Hookeriales, Bryophyta) with emphasis on the unravelling of the phylogeny of Distichophyllum and its allies

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 170, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 157-175

  Ho, Boon Chuan ^a,b   Pokorny, Lisa ^b   Tan, Benito C ^c   Frahm, Jan Peter ^a   Shaw, A Jonathan ^b   Quandt, Dietmar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Achrophyllum; Ancestral states; Calyptrochaeta; Daltonia; Exostome ornamentation; Leskeodon; Limbidium

Indexed keywords

LEAF; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MOSS; ORNAMENTATION; PHYLOGENY; SPOROPHYTE; TAXONOMY;

ACHROPHYLLUM; BRYOPHYTA; CALYPTROCHAETA; DALTONIA (MOSS); DALTONIACEAE; DISTICHOPHYLLUM; HOOKERIALES; LESKEODON;

EID: 84865846948     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: 10958339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2012.01279.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Akiyama H. 1990. Taxonomic studies of mosses of Seram and Ambon (Moluccas, East Indonesia) collected by Indonesian-Japanese botanical expeditions II. Journal of the Faculty of Science, University of Tokyo, Section III. Botany 14: 385-413.
2. Akiyama H, Tsubota H, Yamaguchi T, Suleiman M. 2003. The new genus Benitotania (Daltoniaceae, Bryopsida) from Mt. Kinabalu. The Bryologist 106: 454-459.
3. Bartram EB. 1939. Mosses of the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Science 68: 1-437.
4. Bartram EB. 1944. New and noteworthy Philippine mosses. Farlowia 1: 503-513.
5. Borsch T, Hilu KW, Quandt D, Wilde V, Neinhuis C, Barthlott W. 2003. Non-coding plastid trnT-trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiosperms. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 558-576.
6. Borsch T, Quandt D. 2009. Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of non-coding plastid DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution 282: 169-199.
7. Brotherus VF. 1907. Pilotrichaceae, Nemataceae, Hookeriaceae and Hypopterygiaceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien [nebst ihren Gattungen und wichtigeren Arten, insbesondere den Nutzpflanzen, bearbeitet unter Mitwirkung zahlreicher hervorragender Fachgelehrten] Ed. 1, T. 1, Abt. 3, H. 2. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, 916-972.
8. Brotherus VF. 1925. Hookeriales. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien [nebst ihren Gattungen und wichtigeren Arten, insbesondere den Nutzpflanzen, unter Mitwirkung zahlreicher hervorragender Fachgelehrten] Ed. 2, Bd. 11. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann, 214-278.
9. Buck WR. 1987. Taxonomical and nomenclatural arrangement in the Hookeriales with notes on West Indian taxa. Brittonia 39: 210-224.
10. Buck WR. 1988. Another view of familial delimitation in the Hookeriales. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 64: 29-36.
11. Buck WR. 1991. The basis for familial classification of pleurocarpous mosses. In: Miller NG, ed. Advances in bryology, vol. 4, Bryophyte systematics. Berlin/Stuttgart: J. Cramer, 169-185.
12. Buck WR. 1998. Pleurocarpous mosses of the West Indies. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 82: 1-400.
13. Buck WR. 2007. The history of pleurocarp classification: two steps forward, one step back. In: Newton AE, Tangney RS, eds. Systematics association special volume 71, Pleurocarpous mosses, systematics and evolution. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1-18.
14. Buck WR, Cox CJ, Shaw AJ. 2005. [2004]. Ordinal relationships of pleurocarpous mosses, with special emphasis on the Hookeriales. Systematics and Biodiversity 2: 121-145.
15. Crosby MR. 1974. Toward a revised classification of the Hookeriaceae (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 38: 129-141.
16. Crosby MR, Magill RE, Allen B, He S. 1999. A checklist of the mosses (updated February 2000). St. Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden.
17. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12: 13-15.
18. Fleischer M. 1908. Die Musci der Flora von Buitenzorg (zugleich Laubmoosflora von Java). Flore de Buitenzorg V, Bd. 3. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
19. Gangulee HC. 1977. Mosses of eastern India and adjacent regions 6. Hookeriales. Calcutta: H. C. Gangulee.
20. Goffinet B, Shaw J, Anderson LE, Mishler BD. 1999. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. V. Diplolepideae: Orthotrichaceae. The Bryologist 102: 581-594.
21. Gradstein SR, Vitt DH, Anderson RS. 1984. The epizoic occurrence of Daltonia angustifolia (Musci) in Papua New Guinea. Cryptogamie: Bryologie, Lichénologie 5: 47-50.
22. Gradstein SR, Wilson R. 2008. Protonemal neoteny in bryophytes. In: Mohamed H, Baki BB, Nasrulhaq-Boyce A, Lee PKL, eds. Bryology in the new millennium. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya, 1-11.
23. Gressitt JL, Samuelson GA, Vitt DH. 1968. Moss growing on living Papuan moss-forest weevils. Nature 217: 765-767.
24. Hedenäs L. 1996. A cladistic overview of the 'Hookeriales'. Lindbergia 21: 107-143.
25. Hedenäs L. 1999. How important is phylogenetic history in explaining character states in pleurocarpous mosses? Canadian Journal of Botany 77: 1723-1743.
26. Hedenäs L. 2001. Environmental factors potentially affecting character states in pleurocarpous mosses. The Bryologist 104: 72-91.
27. Hedenäs L. 2002. Important complexes of intercorrelated character states in pleurocarpous mosses. Lindbergia 27: 104-121.
28. Hillis DM, Bull JJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Systematic Biology 42: 182-192.
29. Ho B-C, Tan BC, Nathi Y. 2010. New and noteworthy records of Distichophyllum (Daltoniaceae, Bryopsida) and allied genera in Asia and Australasia. Tropical Bryology 31: 106-122.
30. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES. Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
31. Huttunen S, Ignatov MS, Müller K, Quandt D. 2004. Phylogeny and evolution of epiphytism in the three moss families Meteoriaceae, Brachytheciaceae, and Lembophyllaceae. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden 98: 328-361.
32. Kelchner SA. 2000. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 87: 482-498.
33. Liu Y, Budke JM, Goffinet B. 2012. Phylogenetic inference rejects sporophyte based classification of the Funariaceae (Bryophyta): rapid radiation suggests rampant homoplasy in sporophyte evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62: 130-145.
34. Mason-Gamer RJ, Kellogg EA. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Systematic Biology 45: 524-545.
35. Matteri CM. 1972. Las Hookeriaceae (Musci) andino-patagóniacas. II. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 'Bernardino Rivadavia' e Instituto Nacional de Investigación de las Ciencias Naturales, Botánica 4: 243-280.
36. Miller HA. 1982. Bryophyte evolution and geography. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 18: 145-196.
37. Mitten W. 1859. Musci Indiae Orientalis; an enumeration of the mosses of the East Indies. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society, Botany, Supplement 1: 1-96; 2: 97-171.
38. Mohamed H, Robinson H. 1991. A taxonomic revision of the moss families Hookeriaceae and Hypopterygiaceae in Malaya. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 80: i-iv, 1-44.
39. Morrison DA. 2006. Multiple sequence alignment for phylogenetic purposes. Australian Systematic Botany 19: 479-539.
40. Morrison DA. 2007. Increasing the efficiency of searches for the maximum likelihood tree in a phylogenetic analysis of up to 150 nucleotide sequences. Systematic Biology 56: 988-1010.
41. Müller K. 2005. SeqState - primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA data sets. Applied Bioinformatics 4: 65-69. Available at: http://bioinfweb.info/Software/SeqState [accessed May 2009].
42. Müller K. 2007. PRAP2 - parsimony and likelihood ratchet analyses with PAUP, v.0.9. Available at: http://systevol.nees.uni-bonn.de/software/PRAP2 [accessed May 2009].
43. Nixon KC. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15: 407-414.
44. Olsson S, Buchbender V, Enroth J, Hedenäs L, Huttunen S, Quandt D. 2009a. Evolution of the Neckeraceae (Bryophyta): resolving the backbone phylogeny. Systematics and Biodiversity 7: 419-432.
45. Olsson S, Buchbender V, Enroth J, Huttunen S, Hedenäs L, Quandt D. 2009b. Phylogenetic analyses reveal high levels of polyphyly among pleurocarpous lineages as well as novel clades. The Bryologist 112: 447-466.
46. Pagel M, Meade A. 2006. Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. American Naturalist 167: 808-825.
47. Pagel M, Meade A, Barker D. 2004. Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies. Systematic Biology 53: 673-684.
48. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A. 2009. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary? Research in Computational Molecular Biology 5541: 184-200.
49. Pokorny L, Ho B-C, Frahm J-P, Quandt D, Shaw AJ. 2012. Phylogenetic analyses of morphological evolution in the gametophyte and sporophyte generations of the moss order Hookeriales (Bryopsida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63: 351-364.
50. Pokorny L, Oliván G, Shaw AJ. 2011. Phylogeographic patterns in two southern Hemisphere species of Calyptrochaeta (Daltoniaceae, Bryophyta). Systematic Botany 36: 542-553.
51. Quandt D, Huttunen S, Tangney R, Stech M. 2009. Back to the future? Molecules take us back to the 1925 classification of the Lembophyllaceae (Bryopsida). Systematic Botany 34: 443-454.
52. Quandt D, Müller K, Huttunen S. 2003. Characterisation of the chloroplast DNA psbt-H region and the influence of dyad symmetrical elements on phylogenetic reconstructions. Plant Biology 5: 400-410.
53. UAA intron in bryophytes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 36: 429-443.
54. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2009. Tracer v1.5 Available at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/ [accessed December 2009].
55. Robinson H. 1975. The mosses of Juan Fernandez Islands. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 27: i-iv, 1-88.
56. Ronquist F. 2004. Bayesian inference of character evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 19: 475-481.
57. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572-1574.
58. Sainsbury GOK. 1955. A handbook of the New Zealand mosses. Bulletin of the Royal Society of New Zealand 5: 1-490.
59. Seki T. 1973. Distributional patterns of the Patagonian mosses. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Plant Taxonomists 3: 13-15.
60. Shaw AJ. 2000. Molecular phylogeography and cryptic speciation in the mosses, Mielichhoferia elongata and M.mielichhoferiana (Bryaceae). Molecular Ecology 9: 595-608.
61. Shaw AJ, Cox CJ, Boles SB. 2003. Polarity of peatmoss (Sphagnum) evolution: who says bryophytes have no roots? American Journal of Botany 90: 1777-1787.
62. Shaw AJ, Szövényi P, Shaw B. 2011. Bryophyte diversity and evolution: windows into the early evolution of land plants. American Journal of Botany 98: 1-18.
63. Shaw J, Anderson LE. 1988. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. II. Tetraphis pellucida (Tetraphidaceae). American Journal of Botany 75: 1019-1032.
64. Shaw J, Anderson LE, Mishler BD. 1987. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. I. Diphyscium foliosum (Buxbaumiaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 45: 55-70.
65. Shaw J, Anderson LE, Mishler BD. 1989a. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. III. Funaria hygrometrica, Bryum pseudocapillare, and B.bicolor Systematic Botany 14: 24-36.
66. Shaw J, Anderson LE, Mishler BD. 1989b. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. IV. Haplolepideae: Ditrichaceae and Dicranaceae. The Bryologist 92: 314-325.
67. Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology 49: 369-381.
68. Stöver BC, Müller KF. 2010. TreeGraph 2: combining and visualizing evidence from different phylogenetic analyses. BioMed Central Bioinformatics 11: 7. Available at: http://treegraph.bioinfweb.info/ [accessed September 2010].
69. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*4b10 - Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Windows Version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
70. Tan BC, Robinson H. 1990. A review of Philippine hookeriaceous taxa (Musci). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 75: i-iv, 1-41.
71. Touw A. 2007. Original specimens kept in the Nationaal Herbarium Nederland (Universiteit Leiden Branch) of Asian and South American moss taxa published by F. Dozy, J. H. Molkenboer, R. B. van den Bosch and C. M. van der Sande Lacoste. NHN-Electronic Publication 1: 1-104.
72. Vanderpoorten A, Hedenäs L, Cox CJ, Shaw AJ. 2002. Circumscription, classification, and taxonomy of Amblystegiaceae (Bryopsida) inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequence data and morphology. Taxon 51: 115-122.
73. Vitt DH. 1977. A taxonomic study of the genus Crosbya (=Bellia; Musci). Canadian Journal of Botany 55: 2079-2089.
74. Welch WH. 1966. The Hookeriaceae of Mexico. The Bryologist 69: 1-68.
75. Whittemore A, Allen B. 1989. The systematic position of Adelothecium Mitt. and the familial classification of the Hookeriales (Musci). The Bryologist 92: 261-272.
76. de Winton MD, Beever JE. 2004. Deep-water bryophyte records from New Zealand lakes. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 38: 329-340.
77. Yu J, Devos N, Majestyk P, Shaw AJ. 2010. Intercontinentally disjunct species are derived rather than relictual in the moss genus Daltonia (Bryophyta). Taxon 59: 459-465.
78. Zwickl DJ. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Unpublished PhD dissertation, The University of Texas, Austin, TX. Available at: http://garli.nescent.org