Ordinal relationships of pleurocarpous mosses, with special emphasis on the hookeriales

Systematics and Biodiversity

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 121-145

  Buck, William R ^a   Cox, Cymon J ^b   Shaw, A Jonathan ^b   Goffinet, Bernard ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF SYSTEMATIC BOTANY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008857239     PISSN: 14772000     EISSN: 14780933     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1477200004001410     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akiyama, H., Tsubota, H., Yamaguchi, T. and Suleman, M. 2003. The new genus Benitotania (Daltoniaceae, Bryopsida) from Mt. Kinabalu. Bryologist 106, 454-459.
2. Allen, B.H. 1990. A revision of the genus Crossomitrium (Musci: Hookeriaceae). Tropical Bryology 2, 3-34.
3. Allen, B. 1999. A revision of the moss genus Lepyrodon (Leu-codontales, Lepyrodontaceae). Bryobrothera 5, 23-48.
4. Beckert, S., Steinhäuser, S., Muhle, H. and Knoop, V. 1999. A molecular phylogeny of the bryophytes based on nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial nadS gene. Plant Systematic and Evolution 218, 179-192.
5. Blöcher, R. and Capesius, I. 2002. The systematic position of the Hypopterygiaceae (Bryopsida) inferred from rps4 gene sequences. Cryptogamie, Bryologie 23, 191-207.
6. Brotherus, V.F. 1909. Ptychomniaceae. In: Engler, A. and Prantl, K., Eds., Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 1(3), 1217-1222.
7. Brotherus, V.E 1925. Musci (Laubmoose) 2. Hälfte. In: Engler, A., Ed., Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 2, 11, 1542.
8. Buck, W.R. 1987. Taxonomic and nomenclatural rearrangement in the Hookeriales with notes on West Indian taxa. Brittonia 39, 210-224.
9. Buck, W.R. 1988. Another view of familial delimitation in the Hookeriales. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 64, 29-36.
10. Buck, W.R. 1991. The basis for familial classification of pleurocarp-ous mosses. Advances in Bryology 4, 169-185.
11. Buck, W.R. 1992. A revision of Philophyllum (Hookeriales). Bryologist 95, 334-337.
12. Buck, W.R. 1998. Pleurocarpous mosses of the West Indies. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 82, 1-400.
13. Buck, W.R. and Goffinet, B. 2000. Morphology and classification of mosses. In: Shaw, A.J. and Goffinet, B., Eds., Bryophyte Biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 71-123.
14. Buck, W.R., Goffinet, B. and Shaw, A.J. 2000. Testing morphological concepts of orders of pleurocarpous mosses (Bryophyta) using phylogenetic reconstructions based on trriL-trriP and rps4 sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 16, 180-198.
15. Buck, W.R. and Vm, D.H. 1986. Suggestions for a new familial classification of pleurocarpous mosses. Taxon 35, 21-60.
16. Cox, C.J., Goffinet, B., Shaw, A.J. and Boles, S.B. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships among the mosses based on heterogeneous Bayesian analysis of multiple genes from multiple genomic compartments. Systematic Botany 29, 234-250.
17. Crosby, M.R. 1974. Toward a revised classification of the Hook-eriales (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 38, 129-141.
18. Crosby, M.R., Magill, R.E., Allen, B. and He, S. 2000. A Checklist of the Mosses. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO.
19. De Luna, E., Buck, W.R., Akiyama, H., Arikawa, T., Tsubota, H., González, D., Newton, A.E. and Shaw, A.J. 2000. Ordinal phylogeny within the hypnobryalean pleurocarpous mosses inferred from cladistic analyses of three chloroplast DNA sequence data sets: trriL-P, rps4, and rbch. Bryologist 103, 242-256.
20. Dozy, F. and Molkenboer, J.H. 1846. Musci frondosi inediti archep-elagi Indici, sive descriptio et adumbrado muscorumfrondosorum in insulis Java, Borneo, Sumatra, Celebes, Amboina, nec non in Japonia nuper detectorum minusve cognitorum. Fase. 4. H. W. Hazenberg and Soc., Lugduni-Batavorum.
21. Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12, 13-15.
22. During, H.J. 1977. A taxonomical revision of the Garovaglioideae (Pterobryaceae, Musci). Bryophytorum Bibliotheca 12, 1-244.
23. Fife, A.J. 1992. Beeveria (Hookeriaceae), a new genus from New Zealand. Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium 18, 141-147.
24. Fleischer, M. 1923. Allgemeine Uebersicht des natürlichen Systems der Laubmoose. In: Die Moose der Flora von Buitenzorg 4, in. E.J. Brill, Leiden.
25. Hattaway, R.A. 1984. A monograph of the Ptychomniaceae (Bry-opsida). Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA.
26. Kruijer, J.D. 2002. Hypopterygiaceae of the world. Blumea Supplement 13, 1-388.
27. Maddison, W. and Maddison, D. 2003. Mesquite-version 0.996. Available from the authors, http://mesquiteproject.org/mesquite/ mesquite.html
28. Miller, H.A. 1971. An overview of the Hookeriales. Phytologia 21, 243-252.
29. Mitten, W. 1869. Musci austro-americani, sive enumeratio mus-corum omnium austro-americanorum mihi hucusque cognitorum, eorum preipue in terns Amazonicis Andinisque Ricardo Spruceo lectorum. Journal of the Linnean Society, Botany 12, 1659.
30. Mohamed, H. and ROBINSON, H. 1991. A taxonomic revision of the moss families Hookeriaceae and Hypopterygiaceae in Malaya. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 80, 14, 1-44.
31. Müller, C. 1848. Mniadelphaceae. In: Synopsis muscorum frondosorum omnium hucusque cognitorum 2, 16-28. Alb. Foerstner, Berolini.
32. Nylander, J.A.A. 2002. MrModeltest-version 1.1b. Available from the author, http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/staff/nylander.html
33. Pagel, M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B) 255, 37-45.
34. Pagel, M. 2002. Discrete - version 4. Available from the author. http://www.ams.rdg.ac.uk/zoology/pagel/mppubs.html
35. Rodriguez, R, Oliver, J.L., Marin, A. and Medina, J.R. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 142, 485-501.
36. Sanderson, M.J. 2003. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1.60. http://ginger.ucdavis.edu/r8s/ mppubs.html
37. Schulter, D., Price, T., Mooers, A.O. and Ludwig, D. 1997. Likelihood of ancestral states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51, 1699-1711.
38. Shaw, A.J. 2000. Phylogeny of the Sphagnopsida based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Bryologist 103, 277-306.
39. Stech, M., Pfeiffer, T. and Frey, W. 2002. Molecular generic classification of the Hypopterygiaceae (Bryopsida), with the description of a new genus, Arbusculohypopterygium gen. nov. Studies in austral temperate rain forest bryophytes 10. New Zealand Journal of Botany 40, 207-221.
40. Swofford, D.L. 2001. PAUP: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods), vers. 4.0b8. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
41. Tan, B. and Robinson, H. 1990. A review of the Philippine hook-eriaceous taxa (Musci). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 75, 1-41.
42. Welch, W.H. 1976. Hookeriaceae. North American Flora, Series II, 9, 1-133.
43. Whittemore, A. and ALLEN, B. 1989. The systematic position of Adelothecium Mitt, and the familial classification of the Hookeriales (Musci). Bryologist 92, 261-272.
44. Williams, T. and Kelley, C. 1999. Gnuplot version 3.7.1-software and documentation, http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnuplot.