Phylogenetic analyses of morphological evolution in the gametophyte and sporophyte generations of the moss order Hookeriales (Bryopsida)

Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 351-364

  Pokorny, L ^a   Ho, B C ^b   Frahm, J P ^b   Quandt, D ^b   Shaw, A J ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bryophytes; Hookeriales; MtDNA; NDNA; PDNA; Phylogenetics; Pleurocarpous

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA; RIBOSOMAL SPACER DNA;

ARTICLE; BRYOPSIDA; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; EVOLUTION; FLOWER; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; MITOCHONDRION; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

BASE SEQUENCE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BRYOPSIDA; DNA, PLANT; DNA, RIBOSOMAL SPACER; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GERM CELLS, PLANT; MITOCHONDRIA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; EMBRYOPHYTA; HOOKERIALES; TRACHEOPHYTA;

EID: 84858076169     PISSN: 10557903     EISSN: 10959513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Allen B.H., Crosby M.R., Magill R.E. A review of the genus Stenodictyon (Musci). Lindbergia 1985, 11:149-156.
2. Atkinson L.R. The gametophyte and family relationships. The Phylogeny and Classification of the Ferns 1973, 73-90. The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, (Suppl. 1). A.C. Jermy, J.A. Crabbe, B.A. Thomas (Eds.).
3. Barker D., Meade A., Pagel M. Constrained models of evolution lead to improved prediction of functional linkage from correlated gain and loss of genes. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:14.
4. Barker D., Pagel M. Predicting functional gene links from phylogenetic-statistical analyses of whole genomes. PLoS Computational Biology 2005, 1:e3.
5. Bell N.E., Quandt D., O'Brien T.J., Newton A.E. Taxonomy and phylogeny in the earliest diverging pleurocarps: square holes and bifurcating pegs. The Bryologist 2007, 110:533-560.
6. Bessey C.E. The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1915, 2:109-164.
7. Borsch T., Quandt D. Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of noncoding chloroplast DNA. Plant Systematics and Evolution 2009, 282:169-199.
8. Brotherus, V.F., 1925. Musci (Laubmoose). Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Nebst ihren Gattungen und wichtigeren Arten insbesondere den Nutzplanzen. Zweite Auflage, 11. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pp. 1-542.
9. Buck W.R. A generic revision of the Entodontaceae. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 1980, 48:71-159.
10. Buck W.R. Taxonomical and nomenclatural rearrangement in the Hookeriales with Notes on West Indian Taxa. Brittonia 1987, 39:210-224.
11. Buck W.R. Another view of familial delimitation in the Hookeriales. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 1988, 64:29-36.
12. Buck W.R. The basis for familial classification of pleurocarpous mosses. Advances in Bryology 1991, 4:169-185.
13. Buck W.R. The history of Pleurocarp classification: two steps forward, one step back. Pleurocarpous Mosses. Systematics and Evolution 2007, CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. A.E. Newton, R.S. Tangney (Eds.).
14. Buck W.R., Cox C.J., Shaw A.J., Goffinet B. Ordinal relationships of pleurocarpous mosses, with special emphasis on the Hookeriales. Systematics and Biodiversity 2005, 2:121-145.
15. Collin R., Miglietta M.P. Reversing opinions on Dollo's Law. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2008, 23:602-609.
16. Crosby M.R. Toward a revised classification of the Hookeriaceae (Musci). Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 1974, 38:129-141.
17. Crosby M.R., Magill R.E., Allen B., He S. A Checklist of the Mosses 2000, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, Missouri, pp. 1-309.
18. Dehgan B., Dehgan N.B. Comparative pollen morphology and taxonomic affinities in Cycadales. American Journal of Botany 1988, 75:1501-1516.
19. Dixon H.N. Classification of mosses. Manual of Bryology 1932, 397-412. Martius Nijhoff, The Hague. F. Verdoorn (Ed.).
20. Edwards S.R. Taxonomic implications of cell patterns in haplolepidous moss peristomes. Bryophyte Systematics 1979, 317-346. Academic Press, London, University College of North Wales, Bangor. G.C. Clarke, J.G. Duckett (Eds.).
21. Edwards S.R. Homologies and inter-relationships of moss peristomes. New Manual of Bryology 1984, 658-695. The Hatori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan. R.M. Schuster (Ed.).
22. Fleisher, M., 1904-1923. Die Musci der Flora Buitenzorg (zugleich Laubmoosflora von Java). Bril, E. J., Leiden.
23. Fleisher, M., 1920. Naturliches System der Laubmoose. Hedwigia, pp. 390-400.
24. Goffinet B., Buck W.R., Shaw A.J. Morphology and classification of the Bryophyta. Bryophyte Biology 2008, 576. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. B. Goffinet, A.J. Shaw (Eds.).
25. Goffinet B., Shaw J., Anderson L.E., Mishler B.D. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. V. Diplolepideae: Orthotrichaceae. The Bryologist 1999, 102:581-594.
26. Hedenäs L. A cladistic overview of the" Hookeriales" Lindbergia 1996, 21:107-143.
27. Hedenäs L. Cladistic studies on pleurocarpous mosses: research needs, and use of results. Bryology for the Twenty-first Century 1998, 125-141. Maney Publishing and the British Bryological Society, Leeds, UK. J.W. Bates, N.W. Ashton, J.G. Duckett (Eds.).
28. Hedenäs L. How important is phylogenetic history in explaining character states in pleurocarpous mosses?. Canadian Journal of Botany 1999, 77:1723-1743.
29. Hedenäs L. Environmental factors potentially affecting character states in pleurocarpous mosses. The Bryologist 2001, 104:72-91.
30. Hedenäs L. Morphological characters and their use in pleurocarpous moss systematics. Pleurocarpous Mosses 2007, 227-245. Systematics and Evolution. CRC Press. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FL. A.E. Newton, R.S. Tangney (Eds.).
31. Ho, B.C., 2010. Evolution and diversification of the Hookeriales (Bryopsida) with emphasis on Distichophyllum (Daltoniaceae) and its allied genera. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultat, Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn, pp. 1-158.
32. Holub J. Transfers of Lycopodium species to Huperzia: with a note on generic classification in Huperziaceae. Folia Geobotanica 1985, 20:67-80.
33. Huttunen S., Ignatov M.S., Müller K., Quandt D. Phylogeny and evolution of epiphytism in the three moss families Meteoriaceae, Brachytheciaceae and Lembophyllaceae. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Gardens 2004, 98:328-361.
34. Ingold C.T. Peristome teeth and spore discharge in mosses. Transactions and Proceedings of the Botanical Society of Edinburgh 1959, 38:76-88.
35. Judd W.S., Olmstead R.G. A survey of tricolpate (eudicot) phylogenetic relationships. American Journal of Botany 1994, 91:1627-1644.
36. Kass R.E., Raftery A.E. Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995, 90:773-795.
37. Kelchner S.A. The evolution of non-coding chloroplast DNA and its application in plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 2000, 87:482-498.
38. Klingenberg C.P. Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2008, 39:115-132.
39. Lazarenko A.S. On some cases of singular behavior of the moss peristome. The Bryologist 1957, 60:14-17.
40. Liu Y., Budke J.M., Goffinet B. Phylogenetic inference rejects sporophyte based classification of the Funariaceae (Bryophyta): Rapid radiation suggests rampant homoplasy in sporophyte evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2012, 62:130-145.
41. Miller H.A. An overview of the Hookeriales. Phytologia 1971, 21:243-252.
42. Miller H.A. The phylogeny and distribution of the Musci. Bryophyte Systematics 1979, 11. Academic Press, London, University College of North Wales, Bangor. G.C. Clarke, J.G. Duckett (Eds.).
43. Morrison D.A. Multiple sequence alignment for phylogenetic purposes. Australian Systematic Botany 2006, 19:479-539.
44. Mueller D.M.J., Neumann A.J. Peristome structure and the regulation of spore release in Arthrodontous mosses. Advances in Bryology 1988, 3:135-158.
45. Müller, J., Müller, K., Neinhuis, C., Quandt, D., 2008. PhyDE® (Phylogenetic Data Editor).
46. Müller, K., 2007. PRAP2-likelihood and parsimony ratchet analysis. http://www.phyde.de.
47. Newton, A.E., Wikström, N., Bell, N., Lowe Forrest, L., Ignatov, M.S., 2007. Dating the diversification of the Pleurocarpous Mosses. In: Newton, A.E., Tangney, R.S. (Eds.), Pleurocarpous Mosses: Systematics and Evolution. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, p. 464.
48. Newton A.E., Wikström N., Shaw A.J. Mosses (Bryophyta). The Timetree of Life 2009, 138-145. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. S.B. Hedges, S. Kumar (Eds.).
49. Nixon K.C. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 1999, 15:407-414.
50. Nylander, J.A.A., 2004. MrModeltest. Program distributed by the author, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
51. Olsson S., Buchbender V., Enroth J., Hedenäs L., Huttunen S., Quandt D. Phylogenetic analyses reveal high levels of polyphyly among pleurocarpous lineages as well as novel clades. The Bryologist 2009, 112:447-466.
52. Olsson S., Buchbender V., Enroth J., Huttunen S., Hedenäs L., Quandt D. Evolution of the Neckeraceae (Bryophyta): resolving the backbone phylogeny. Systematics and Biodiversity 2009, 7:419-432.
53. Patterson P.M. The aberrant behavior of the peristome teeth of certain mosses. The Bryologist 1953, 56:157-159.
54. Pedersen N., Russell S.J., Newton A.E., Ansell S.W. A novel molecular protocol for the rapid extraction of DNA from bryophytes and the utility of direct amplification of DNA from a single dwarf male. The Bryologist 2006, 109:257-264.
55. Quandt D., Huttunen S., Tangney R., Stech M., Schwarzbach A. Back to the future? Molecules take us back to the 1925 classification of the Lembophyllaceae (Bryopsida). Systematic Botany 2009, 34:443-454.
56. Quandt D., Muller K., Huttunen S. Characterisation of the chloroplast DNA psbT-H region and the influence of dyad symmetrical elements on phylogenetic reconstructions. Plant Biology 2003, 5:400-410.
57. Quandt D., Stech M. Molecular evolution of the trnT UGU-trnF GAA region in bryophytes. Plant Biology 2004, 6:545-554.
58. Quandt D., Stech M. Molecular evolution of the trnLUAA intron in bryophytes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2005, 36:429-443.
59. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., 2009. Tracer v1.5. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/.
60. Robinson H. The mosses of Juan Fernandez islands. Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 1975, 27:1-88.
61. Rohrer J.R. Incongruence between gametophytic and sporophytic classifications in mosses. Taxon 1988, 37:838-845.
62. Shaw A.J. Molecular phylogeography and cryptic speciation in the mosses, Mielichhoferia elongata and M. mielichhoferiana (Bryaceae). Molecular Ecology 2000, 9:595-608.
63. Shaw A.J., Anderson L.E. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. II. Tetraphis pellucida (Tetraphidaceae). American Journal of Botany 1988, 75:1019-1032.
64. Shaw A.J., Cox C.J., Boles S. Polarity of peatmoss (Sphagnum) evolution: who says bryophytes have no roots?. American Journal of Botany 2003, 90:1777-1787.
65. Shaw A.J., Cox C.J., Goffinet B., Buck W.R., Boles S.B. Phylogenetic evidence of a rapid radiation of pleurocarpous mosses (Bryophyta). Evolution 2003, 57:2226-2241.
66. Shaw A.J., Holz I., Cox C.J., Goffinet B. Phylogeny, character evolution, and biogeography of the Godwanic Moss Family Hypopterygiaceae (Bryophyta). Systematic Botany 2008, 33:21-30.
67. Shaw J., Anderson L.E., Mishler B.D. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. I. Diphyscium foliosum (Buxbaumiaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 1987, 45:55-70.
68. Shaw J., Anderson L.E., Mishler B.D. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. III. Funaria hygrometrica, Bryum pseudocapillare, and B. bicolor. Systematic Botany 1989, 14:24-36.
69. Shaw J., Mishler B.D., Anderson L.E. Peristome development in mosses in relation to systematics and evolution. IV. Haplolepideae: Ditrichaceae and Dicranaceae. The Bryologist 1989, 92:314-325.
70. Simmons M.P. Independence of alignment and tree search. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2004, 31:874-879.
71. Simmons M.P., Freudenstein J.V. The effects of increasing genetic distance on alignment of, and tree construction from, rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2003, 26:444-451.
72. Smith A.R., Pryer K.M., Schuettpelz E., Korall P., Schneider H., Wolf P.G. A classification for extant ferns. Taxon 2006, 55:705-731.
73. Sotiaux A., Enroth J., Olsson S., Quandt D., Vanderpoorten A. When morphology and molecules tell us different stories: a case-in-point with Leptodon corsicus, a new and unique endemic moss species from Corsica. Journal of Bryology 2009, 31:186-196.
74. Stuessy T.F. Palynology. Plant Taxonomy: The Systematic Evaluation of Comparative Data 2009, Columbia University Press, pp. 223-238.
75. Sullivan J., Joyce P. Model selection in Phylogenetics. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2005, 36:445-466.
76. Swofford D.L. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods) 2002, Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishsers, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
77. Tan, B.C., Robinson, H.E., 1990. A review of Philippine Hookeriaceous taxa (Musci). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany, pp. 1-41.
78. Taylor E.C. The Philibert peristome articles. an abridged translation. The Bryologist 1962, 65:175-212.
79. Vitt D.H. Adaptive modes of the moss sporophyte. The Bryologist 1981, 84:166-186.
80. Wagner W.H.J., Beitel J.M. Generic classification of modern North America Lycopodiaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 1992, 79:676-686.
81. Whittemore A., Allen B. the systematic position of Adelothecium Mitt. and the familial classification of the Hookeriales (Musci). The Bryologist 1989, 92:261-272.
82. Windham M.D., Haufler C.H. Biosystematic uses of fern gametophytes derived from herbarium specimens. American Fern Journal 1986, 76:114-128.
83. Yu J., Devos N., Majestyk P., Shaw A.J. Intercontinentally disjunct species are derived rather than relictual in the moss genus Daltonia (Bryophyta). Taxon 2010, 59:459-465.
84. Zotz G., Bader M.Y. Epiphytic plants in a changing world-global: change effects on vascular and non-vascular epiphytes. Progress in Botany 2009, 70:147-170.
85. Zotz G., Hietz P. The physiological ecology of vascular epiphytes: current knowledge, open questions. Journal of experimental botany 2001, 52:2067-2078.
86. Zwickl D.J. Genetic Algorithm Approaches for the Phylogenetic Analysis Of Large Biological Sequence Datasets Under the Maximum Likelihood Criterion 2006, The University of Texas Austin.