Simplifying the 360-degree peer evaluation in a physical medicine and rehabilitation residency program

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 91, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 797-803

  Sorg, John C ^a,e   Wilson, Richard D ^a,b   Perzynski, Adam T ^b,c   Tran, Daniel ^b,d   Vargo, Mary M ^a,b  

^a MetroHealth Rehabilitation Institute of Ohio ^*  (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Center for Health Care Research and Policy   (United States)

^d LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Lovelace Rehabilitation Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

360 Degree Evaluation; Graduate Medical Education; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation; Physician Competence

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; EVALUATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PEER REVIEW; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; OHIO; PEER REVIEW; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84865786428     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3182645e63     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ACGME Competencies: Suggested best methods for evaluation. ACGME/ABMS Joint InitiativeAttachment/ Toolbox of Assessment Methods, Version 1.1. (No longer available at www.acgme.org/outcome but can be obtained by contacting ACGME). Accessed September 2000
2. Musick DW, McDowell SM, Clark N, et al: Pilot study of a 360-degree assessment instrument for physical medicine and rehabilitation residency programs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82:394-402
3. Massagli TL, Carline JD: Reliability of a 360-degree evaluation to assess resident competence. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86:845-52
4. Brown D, Cuccurullo S, Lee J, et al: Electrodiagnostic medicine skills competency in physical medicine and rehabilitation residents: A method for development and assessment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87: 654-65
5. Tran D, Vargo M: Assessment of the 360 degree peer evaluation in a PM&R residency program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87:S4
6. https://www.myevaluations.com/Services.htm; accessed 2006
7. Ogunyemi D, Gonzalez G, Fong A, et al: From the eye of the nurses: 360-degree evaluation of residents. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2009;29:105-10
8. Risucci DA, Tortolani AJ, Ward RJ: Ratings of surgical residents by self, supervisors and peers. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989;169:519-26
9. Joshi R, Ling FW, Jaeger J: Assessment of a 360-degree instrument to evaluate residents' competency in interpersonal and communication skills. Acad Med 2004;79:458-63
10. Wood J, Collins J, Burnside ES, et al: Patient, faculty, and self-assessment of radiology resident performance: A 360 degree method of measuring professionalism and interpersonal communication skills. Acad Radiol 2004;11:931-9
11. Davis JD: Comparison of faculty, peer, self and nurse assessment of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:647-51
12. Weigelt JA, Brasel KJ, Bragg D, et al: The 360 degree evaluation: Increased work with little return? Curr Surg 2004;61:616-26. discussion 627-8
13. Stark R, Korenstein D, Karani R: Impact of a 360-degree professionalism assessment on faculty comfort and skills in feedback delivery. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:969-72
14. Higgins RSD, Bridges J, Burke JM, et al: Implementing the ACGME general competencies in a cardiothoracic surgery residency programusing 360-degree feedback. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:12-7
15. Pollock RA, Donnelly MB, Plymale MA, et al: 360-degree evaluations of plastic surgery resident accreditation council for graduate medical education competencies: Experience using a short form. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122:639-49
16. Reisdorff EJ, Hughes MJ, Castaneda C, et al: Developing a valid evaluation for interpersonal and communication skills. Acad Emerg Med 2006;13:1056-61
17. Allerup P, Aspegren K, Ejlersen E, et al: Use of 360-degree assessment of residents in internal medicine in a Danish setting: A feasibility study. Med Teach 2007;29:166-70
18. Carmines EG, Zeller RA: Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage Publications Series Number 07-017. Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications, Inc, 1979
19. Clark LA, Watson D: Constructing validity: Basic issues of objective scale development. Psychol Assess 1995;7:309-19
20. Qu B, Zhao Y, Sun B: Evaluation of residents in professionalism and communication skills in south China. Saudi Med J 2010;31:1260-5
21. DiMatteo MR, DiNicola DD: Sources of assessment of physician performance: A study of comparative reliability and patterns of intercorrelation. Med Care 1981; 19:829-39
22. Sargeant J, Mann K, Ferrier S: Exploring family physicians' reactions to multisource feedback: Perceptions of credibility and usefulness. Med Educ 2005;39:497-504
23. Ferrari S, Vozzolo B, Daneman D, et al: Feasibility of physician peer assessment in an academic health sciences centre. Healthc Q 2011;14:50-5
24. French DP, Sutton S: Reactivity of measurement in health psychology: How much of a problem is it? What can be done about it? Br J Health Psychol 2010;15 (pt 3):453-68
25. McCambridge J, Kypri K: Can simply answering research questions change behaviour? Systematic review and meta analyses of brief alcohol intervention trials. PLoS One 2011;6:e23748
26. Conner M, Godin G, Norman P, et al: Using the question-behavior effect to promote disease prevention behaviors: Two randomized controlled trials. Health Psychol 2011;30:300-9