Patient, faculty, and self-assessment of radiology resident performance: A 360-degree method of measuring professionalism and interpersonal/communication skills

Academic Radiology

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 931-939

  Wood, Jonathan ^a   Collins, Jannette ^a,d   Burnside, Elizabeth S ^a   Albanese, Mark A ^b,c   Propeck, Pamela A ^a   Kelcz, Frederick ^a   Spilde, Jeannette M ^a   Schmaltz, Lisa M ^a  

^a Departments of Radiology   (United States)

^b UW Population Health Institute   (United States)

^c 2068 MSC   (United States)

^d University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

Author keywords

360 Degree evaluation; evaluating interpersonal communication skills; evaluating professionalism; evaluating radiology residents

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEASUREMENT; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SELF EVALUATION;

BREAST; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PILOT PROJECTS; RADIOLOGY; RADIOLOGY, INTERVENTIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF-EVALUATION PROGRAMS;

EID: 3442902847     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Collins J., Rosado de Christenson M., Gray L., Hyde C., Koeller K.K., Laine F., Wood B. General competencies in radiology residency training definitions, skills, education and assessment. Acad Radiol. 9:2002;721-726
2. Collins J., Hyde C., Gray L., et al. Radiology resident evaluation a form that addresses the six competencies of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Acad Radiol. 9:2002;815-816
3. Toolbox of Assessment Methods. 2003;. Version 1.1. September 2000; Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education/American Board of Medical Specialties. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/outcome/assess/toolbox.asp. (accessed January 7, ).
4. Davis J. Comparison of faculty, peer, self, and nurse assessment of obstetrics and gynecology residents. Obstet Gynecol. 99:2002;647-651
5. Musick D.W., McDowell S.M., Clark N., Salcido R. Pilot study of a 360-degree assessment instrument for physical medicine & rehabilitation residency programs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 82:2003;394-402
6. Tintinalli J.E. Evaluation of emergency medicine residents by nurses. Acad Med. 1989;49-50. January
7. Williamson K., Steele J.L., Gunderman R.B., Wilkin T.D., Tarver R.D., Jackson V.P., Kreipke D.L. Assessing radiology resident reporting skills. Radiology. 225:2002;719-722
8. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies suggested best methods for evaluation. 2002;. Available at: http:///www.acgme. org/Outcome/assess/ToolTable.pdf. (accessed December 31, ).
9. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcome Project. Interpersonal and Communication Skills Assessment Approaches. 2002;. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/outcome/assess/IandC_Index.asp. (accessed December 31, ).
10. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Outcome Project. Professionalism Assessment Approaches. 2002;. Available at: http://www.acgme. org/outcome/assess/profIndex.asp. (accessed December 31, ).
11. Swing S. Assessing the general competencies ACGME work in progress. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Bulletin November 2002;6-7. 2002;. Available at: http://www.acgme.org. (accessed December 31, ).
12. Swing S.R. Assessing the ACGME general competencies general considerations and assessment methods. Acad Emerg Med. 9:2002;1278-1288
13. Murphy K.R., Cleveland J.N. Understanding performance appraisal social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. 1995;Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
14. Rodgers K.G., Manifold C. 360-degree feedback possibilities for assessment of the ACGME core competencies for emergency medicine residents. Acad Emerg Med. 9:2002;1300-1304
15. TEAMS, Inc. Tempe A.Z. Multi-source, 360-degree feedback survey results. 1995;. TEAMS, Inc, Oct.
16. Vinson M.N. The pros and cons of 360-degree feedback making it work. Training Devel. 1996;11-12. Apr
17. Dalton M. Multi-rater feedback and conditions for change. Consult Psychol J Pract Res. 48:1996;12-16
18. Kochar M.S., Simpson D.E., Brown D. Graduate medical education at the Medical College of Wisconsin new initiatives to respond to the changing residency training environment. Wisc Med J. 102:2003;38-42
19. Borman W.C. Evaluating performance effectiveness on the job how can we generate more accurate ratings? Lloyd J.S. Evaluation of non-cognitive skills and clinical performance. 1982;179-193 American Board of Medical Specialties, Chicago, IL
20. Brennan R.L. Performance assessments from the perspective of generalizability theory. Appl Psych Measure. 24:2000;339-353
21. Dunbar S.B., Koretz D.M., Hoover H.D. Quality control in the development and use of performance assessment. Appl Measure Educ. 4:1991;289-303
22. Murphy K.R., Cleveland J.N. Understanding performance appraisal social, organizational, and goal-based perspectives. 1995;Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
23. Woolliscroft J.O., Howell J.D., Patel B.P., Swanson D.B. Resident-patient interactions the humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors, and nurses. Acad Med. 69:1994;216-224
24. Butterfield P.D., Mazzaferi E.L., Sachs L.A. Nurses as evaluators of the humanistic behavior of internal medicine residents. J Med Educ. 62:1987;842-849
25. Tamblyn R., Benaroya S., Snell L., McLeod P., Schnarch B., Abrahamo-wicz M. The feasibility and value of using patient satisfaction ratings to evaluate internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med. 9:1994;146-152
26. Tamblyn R., Schnarch B., Abrahamowicz M., Colliver J.A., Snell J.A. Can standardized patients predict real patient satisfaction with the doctor-patient relationship? Teach Learn Med. 6:1994;36-44
27. Webster G.D. Final report on the patient satisfaction questionnaire project-executive summary. 1989;2-27 American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA