360-Degree evaluations of plastic surgery resident accreditation council for graduate medical education competencies: Experience using a short form

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 639-649

  Pollock, Richard A ^a   Donnelly, Michael B ^a   Plymale, Margaret A ^a   Stewart, Daniel H ^a   Vasconez, Henry C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY SURGERY; ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL STAFF; NURSE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; RESIDENT; SKILL; SURGEON; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

ACCREDITATION; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; KENTUCKY; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; NURSING STAFF, HOSPITAL; SPECIALTY BOARDS; SURGERY, PLASTIC;

EID: 67749129308     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d5fbd     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bracken, D. W., Timmreck, C. W., and Church, A. H. (Eds.). The Handbook of Multisource Feedback: The Comprehensive Resource for Designing and Implementing MSF Processes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
2. Sisson, D. E. Forced choice: The new Army rating. Personnel Psychol. 1: 265, 1948.
3. Personnel Research Section Report 900. A Study of Officer Rating Methodology: Overall Design. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army, 1951.
4. Personnel Research Section Report 906. Validities of Four Types of Five-Step Rating Scales. Washington, D.C.: Department of the Army, 1951.
5. Shelton, H. W. Mutual rating: A contribution to the technique of participation. Bull. Taylor Soc. 5: 59, 1920.
6. Paterson, D. G. The Scott Company Graphic Rating Scale. J. Personnel Res. 111: 361, 1922.
7. Williams, S. B., and Leavitt, H. J. Group opinion as a predictor of military leadership. J. Consult. Psychol. 2: 147, 1949.
8. U.S. Office of Strategic Services. Assessment of Men. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston, 1948.
9. Wherry, R. J., and Fryer, D. C. Buddy ratings: Popularity contest or leadership criterion? Personnel Psychol. 2: 147, 1949.
10. Pelz, D. Power and Leadership in the First-Line Supervisor: Michigan Survey. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Michigan University Press, 1951.
11. Whistler, T. L., and Harper, S. F. Performance Appraisal: Research and Practice. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston, 1962.
12. Edwards, M. R., and Sproull, J. R. Safeguarding your employee rating system. Business 35: 17, 1985.
13. Lomgenecker,C. O., Sims, H. P., and Giola, D. A. Behind the mask: The politics of employee appraisal. Acad. Manage. Exec. 1: 183, 1987.
14. Edwards, M. R., Ewen, A. J., and Verdini, W. Fair performance management and pay practices for diverse work forces: The promise of multisource feedback. A.C.A. J. 11: 50, 1995.
15. Konger, J. A., and Benjamin, B. Building Leaders: How Successful Companies Develop the Next Generation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1999.
16. Church, A. H., Rogelberg, S. G., and Waclawski, J. The relationship between performance and response rates in multirater feedback. Personnel Psychol. 53: 435, 2000.
17. Jako, R. A. Evolution of multisource feedback in a dynamic environment. In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, and A. H. Church (Eds.), The Handbook of Multisource Feedback: The Comprehensive Resource for Designing and Implementing MSF Processes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
18. Lomgenecker, L. S., and Ludwig, D. Ethical dilemmas in performance appraisal revisited. J. Bus. Ethics 9: 961, 1990.
19. London, M., and Beatty, R. W. 360-Degree feedback as a competitive advantage. Hum. Resour. Manage. 32: 353, 1993.
20. Bracken, D. W. Straight talk about multirater feedback. Train. Dev. 48: 44, 1994.
21. London, M., Smither, J. W., and Adsit, D. J. Accountability: The Achilles' heel of multisource feedback. Group Organ. Manage. 22: 162, 1997.
22. Waldman, D. A., and Atwater, L. E. The Power of 360-Degree Feedback: How to Leverage Performance Evaluations for Top Productivity. Houston: Gulf, 1998.
23. Buckingham, M., and Coffman, C. First, break all the rules. Fortune October 25, 1999. P. 366.
24. Bechman, H. B., and Frankel, R. M. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann. Intern. Med. 101: 692, 1984.
25. Crystal, B. The 360-degree assessment: Healthcare executives receive letters from home about their leadership effectiveness. Healthc. Exec. 9: 18, 1994.
26. Axline, L. L. Viewpoints: The ethics of performance appraisal. Adv. Manage. J. 61: 44, 1996.
27. Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., and Antonioni, D. Has 360-degree feedback gone amok? Acad. Manage. Exec. 12: 86, 1998.
28. Branch, W. T., Jr. The ethics of caring and medical education. Acad. Med. 75: 127, 2000.
29. Rees, C., and Shepherd, M. The acceptability of 360-degree judgments as a method of assessing undergraduate medical students' personal and professional behaviors. Med. Educ. 39: 49, 2005.
30. Wenrich, M. D., Carline, I. D., Giles, L. M., et al. Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Acad. Med. 68: 680, 1993.
31. Connors, G. P., and Munro, T. W. 360-degree physician evaluations. Healthc. Exec. 5: 58, 2001.
32. Swing, S. Assessing the ACGME general competencies: General considerations and assessment methods. Acad. Emerg. Med. 9: 1278, 2002.
33. Rodgers, K. G., and Manifold, C. 360-degree feedback: Possibilities for assessmentofthe ACGME core competencies for emergency medicine residents. Acad. Emerg. Med. 9: 1300, 2002.
34. Violato, C., Lockyer, J. M., and Fidler, H. Multisource feedback: A method of assessing surgical practice. B.M.J. 326: 546, 2003.
35. Higgins, R. S. D., Bridges, J., Burke, J. M., et al. Implementing the ACGME general competencies in a cardiothoracic surgery residency program using 360-degree feedback. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 77: 12, 2004.
36. Gray, J. D. Global rating scales in residency education. Acad. Med. 71: S55, 1996.
37. Gordon,M. J.Cutting the Gordian knot:Atwo-part approach to the evaluation and professional development of residents. Acad. Med. 72: 876, 1997.
38. Fidler, H., Lockyer, J. M., Toews, J., et al. Changing physicians' practices: The effect of individual feedback. Acad. Med. 74: 702, 1999.
39. ACGME Outcomes Project. Available at: http://www.acgme. org. Accessed January 1, 2007.
40. ACGME toolbox of assessment methods Available at: http:// www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/compFullasp. Accessed January 1, 2007.
41. Tornow, W. W., and London, M. Maximizing the Value of 360-Degree Feedback: A Process for Successful Individual and Organizational Development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.
42. Hedge,J.W., Borman,W.C., and Birkeland,S.A.History and development of multisource feedback as a methodology. In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, and A. H. Church (Eds.), The Handbook of Multisource Feedback: The Comprehensive Resource for Designing and Implementing MSF Processes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
43. Ewen, A.J., and Edwards, M.R. Readiness for multisource feedback. In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, and A. H. Church (Eds.), The Handbook of Multisource Feedback: The Comprehensive Resource for Designing and Implementing MSF Processes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
44. Bracken, D. W., and Timmreck, C. W. Guidelines for multisource feedback when used for decision making. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 36: 64, 1999.
45. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
46. Arnold, L. Assessing professional behavior: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Acad. Med. 77: 502, 2002.
47. Rohrich, R. J. Professionalism: The end product of the medical profession. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 118: 1487, 2006.
48. Yukyl, F., and Lepsinger, R. How to get the most out of 360-degree feedback. Training 32: 45, 1995.
49. Antonioni, D. The design of an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process. Organ. Dyn. 25: 24, 1996.
50. Wimer, S., and Nowack, K. 13 Common mistakes using 360-degree feedback. Train. Dev. 52: 69, 1998.
51. Westerman, J. W., and Rosse, J. G. Reducing the threat of rater non-participation in 360-degree feedback systems: An exploratory examination of antecedents to participation in upward ratings. Group Organ. Manage. 67: 189, 1994.
52. Woehr, D. J., and Huffcutt, A. I. Rater training for performance appraisal: A quantitative review. J. Occup. Org. Psychol. 67: 189, 2006.
53. Plymale, M. A., Donnelly, M., Lawton, J., et al. Faculty evaluation of surgery clerkship students: Important components of written comments. Acad. Med. 77: S45, 2002.
54. Brousseau, K., and Perrault, M. Team View/360. Agoura Hills, Calif.: Advanced Teamware, 1993.
55. Bernardin, H. J., and Tyler, C. L. Legal and ethical issues in multisource feedback. In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timm-reck, and A. H. Church (Eds.), The Handbook of Multisource Feedback: The Comprehensive Resource for Designing and Implementing MSF Processes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
56. Dalton, M. A., and Hollenbeck, G. P. A model for behavioral change. In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, and A. H. Church (Eds.), The Handbook of Multisource Feedback: The Comprehensive Resource for Designing and Implementing MSF Processes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
57. Kaplan, R. E., Drath, W. H., and Kofodimos, J. R. High hurdles: The challenge of executive self-development. Manage. Exec 1: 195, 1987.
58. Kluger, A. N., and DeNisi, A. The effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol. Bull. 119: 254, 1996.