Participatory practices: Lessons learnt from two initiatives using online digital technologies to build knowledge

Computers and Education

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 110-119

  Joubert, Marie ^a   Wishart, Jocelyn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Authoring tools and methods; Computer mediated collaboration; Cooperative collaborative learning; Learning communities

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

AUTHORING TOOLS AND METHODS; COOPERATIVE/COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES; LEARNING COMMUNITY; ONLINE DISCUSSIONS; SCHOOL STUDENTS; SOCIO-CULTURAL; TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING;

EDUCATION;

EID: 84865623430     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.09.024     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Adamic, L. A., Wei, X., Yang, J., Gerrish, S., Nam, K. K., & Clarkson, G. S. (2010). Individual focus and knowledge contribution. First Monday, 15(3).
2. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch.
3. Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Bonk, C. J. (2003). Communication in a web-based conferencing system: The quality of computer-mediated interactions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 31-43.
4. Aragon, S. R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2003(100), 57-68.
5. Bateman, P., & Pike, J. (2007). Lurking in online communities: A communication apprehension perspective. Philadelphia: Acadmey of Management. OCIS Division.
6. Bean, L., & Hott, D. D. (2005). Wiki: A speedy new tool to manage projects. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 16(5).
7. Bos, N., Olson, J., Gergle, D., Olson, G., Wright, Z. (2002). Effects of four computer-mediated communications channels on trust development. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, 135-140.
8. Coleman, D., Levine, S. (2008). Collaboration 2.0 technology and best practices for successful collaboration in a web 2.0 World. Happy about.
9. Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between web 1.0 and web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6), 2.
10. Danis, C., & Singer, D. (2008). A wiki instance in the enterprise: Opportunities, concerns and reality. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 495-504). San Diego: ACM, Retrieved from. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1460563.1460642.
11. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-16). Amsterdam, NL: Pergamon, Elsevier Science.
12. Dillenbourg, Pierre (2005). Designing biases that augment socio-cognitive interactions. In R. Bromme, F. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computer-mediated knowledge communication-and how they may be overcome (pp. 243-264). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
13. Downing, K. J., Lam, T., Kwong, T., Downing, W., & Chan, S. (2007). Creating interaction in online learning: A case study. ALT-J, 15(3), 201-215.
14. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933. (Pubitemid 39558160)
15. Erickson, T., & Kellogg, W. A. (2000). Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that support social processes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(1), 59-83, Retrieved from. http://portal.acm.org/ citation.cfm?id345004.
16. Fallis, D. (2008). Toward an epistemology of Wikipedia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(10), 1662-1674.
17. Friedman, B., Khan, P. H., Jr., & Howe, D. C. (2000). Trust online. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 34-40, ACM.
18. Garrison, D. R. (2006). Online collaboration principles. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 25-34.
19. Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115-152.
20. Hou, H.-T., & Wu, S.-Y. (2011). Analyzing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of an online synchronous collaborative discussion instructional activity using an instant messaging tool: A case study. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1459-1468.
21. Kehrwald, B. (2008). Understanding social presence in text-based online learning environments. Distance Education, 29(1), 89-106.
22. Kwan, M., & Ramachandran, D. (2009). Trust and online reputation systems. In J. Goldbeck (Ed.), Computing with social trust - Human computer interaction series (pp. 287-311). London: Springer-Verlag.
23. Lanier, J. (2006). Digital Maoism: The hazards of the new online collectivism. The Edge, 183.
24. Levinson, R. (2003). Key issues in bioethics: A guide for teachers. London: RoutledgeFalmer. Long, S. A. (2006). Exploring the wiki world: The new face of collaboration. New Library World, 107(3/4), 157-159.
25. Mäkitalo, K., Weinberger, A., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2004). Uncertainty-reducing cooperation scripts in online learning environments. Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer-supported learning. In Proceedings of first joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs "instructional design" and "learning and instruction with computers" (pp. 312-319), Retrieved from. http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ hal-00190392/Tubingen.
26. Meyer, K. A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55-65. (Pubitemid 38818749)
27. Miller, P. (2005). Building the new library. Ariadane, Retrieved April 2011, from. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue45/miller/Web 2.0.
28. Newton, P., Driver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
29. Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443-456.
30. Pea, R. D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 285-299.
31. Peters, V. L., & Hewitt, J. (2010). An investigation of student practices in asynchronous computer conferencing courses. Computers & Education, 54(4), 951-961.
32. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer,W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71.
33. Rutkowski, A. F., Vogel, D. R., Van Genuchten, M., Bemelmans, T. M. A., & Favier, M. (2002). E-collaboration: The reality of virtuality. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 45(4), 219-230, IEEE.
34. Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning. Routledge.
35. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-115). Cambridge University Press.
36. Shank, G., & Cunningham, D. (1996). Mediated phosphor dots: Toward a post-Cartesian model of computer-mediated communication via the semiotic superhighway. In C. Ess (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication (pp. 27-41). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
37. Sierpinska, A. (2004). Research in mathematics education through a keyhole: Task problematization. For the Learning of Mathematics, 24(2), 7-15.
38. Sterelny, K. (2004). Externalism, epistemic artefacts and the extended mind. In R. Schantz (Ed.), The externalist challenge. New studies on cognition and intentionality (pp. 239- 254), Berlin.
39. Suthers, D. (2006). Technology affordances for intersubjective meaning making: A research agenda for CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 315-337. (Pubitemid 44394679)
40. Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115-136.
41. Thomas, M. J. W. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 351-366. (Pubitemid 36836945)
42. Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131-150.
43. Wagner, C., & Majchrzak, A. (2007). Enabling customer-centricity using wikis and the wiki way. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 17-43. (Pubitemid 46785756)
44. Wang, Q., & Woo, H. L. (2007). Comparing asynchronous online discussions and face to face discussions in a classroom setting. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(2), 272-286.
45. Wishart, J., Green, D., Joubert, M., & Triggs, P. (2011). Discussing Ethical Issues in School Science: An investigation into the opportunities to practise and develop arguments offered by online and face-to-face discussions. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 1(1), 47-69, Routledge.
46. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(1), 7-44.