An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source

Brain

Volumn 119, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 889-905

  Wilding, Edward L ^a   Rugg, Michael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Event related potential; Familiarity; Memory for source; Recognition memory; Recollection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECOGNITION; SCALP; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME;

EID: 0029967210     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/119.3.889     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Atkinson RC, Juola JF. Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In: Kornblum S, editor. Attention and performance IV. New York: Academic Press, 1973: 583-612.
2. Buckner AL, Tulving E. Neuroimaging studies of memory: theory and recent PET results. In: Baron JC, Grafman J, editors. Handbook of neuropsychology, Vol. 10. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995: 439-66.
3. Friedman D. ERPs during continuous recognition memory for words. Biol Psychol 1990; 30: 61-87.
4. Gardiner JM, Java RI. Recognising and remembering. In: Collins AF, Gathercole SE, Conway MA, Morris PE, editors. Theories of memory. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993: 163-88.
5. Haist F, Shimamura AP, Squire LR. On the relationship between recall and recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1992; 18: 691-702.
6. Hirst W, Johnson MK, Kim JK, Phelps EA, Risse G, Volpe BT. Recognition and recall in amnesics. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1986; 12: 445-51.
7. Hirst W, Johnson MK, Phelps EA, Volpe BT. More on recognition and recall in amnesics. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1988; 14: 758-62.
8. Humphreys MS, Bain JD, Pike R. Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: a theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychol Rev 1989; 96: 208-33.
9. Jacoby LL. Perceptual enhancement: persistent effects of an experience. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1983; 9: 21-38.
10. Jacoby LL, Dallas M. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. J Exp Psychol Gen 1981; 110: 306-40.
11. Jacoby LL, Kelley C. Unconscious influences of memory: dissociations and automaticity. In: Milner AD, Rugg MD, editors. The neuropsychology of consciousness. London: Academic Press, 1992: 201-33.
12. Janowsky JS, Shimamura AP, Squire LR. Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 1989; 27: 1043-56.
13. Jasper HH. The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1958; 10: 371-5.
14. Johnson R. Event-related potential insights into the neurobiology of memory systems. In: Baron JC, Grafman J, editors. Handbook of neuropsychology, Vol. 10. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995: 135-64.
15. Johnson R Jr, Pfefferbaum A, Kopell BS. P300 and long-term memory: latency predicts recognition performance. Psychophysiology 1985; 22: 497-507.
16. Johnston WA, Hawley KJ, Elliott JMG. Contribution of perceptual fluency to recognition judgments. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1991; 17: 210-23.
17. Johnson MK, Hashtroudi S, Lindsay DS. Source monitoring. [Review]. Psychol Bull 1993; 114: 3-28.
18. Kelley CM, Jacoby LL, Hollingshead A. Direct versus indirect tests of memory for source: judgments of modality. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1989; 15: 1101-8.
19. Keselman HJ, Rogan JC. Repeated measures F tests and psychophysiological research: controlling the number of false positives. Psychophysiology 1980; 17: 499-503.
20. Knowlton BJ, Squire LR. Remembering and knowing: two different expressions of declarative memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1995; 21: 699-710.
21. Kučera H, Francis WN. Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence (RI): Brown University Press. 1967.
22. Mandler G. Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence. Psychol Rev 1980; 87: 252-71.
23. McCarthy G, Wood CC. Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 62: 203-8.
24. McClelland JL, McNaughton BL, O'Reilly RC. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. [Review]. Psychol Rev 1995; 102: 419-57.
25. Moscovitch M. Memory and working-with-memory: a component process model based on modules and central systems. J Cognit Neurosci 1992; 4: 257-67.
26. Moscovitch M. Models of consciousness and memory. In: Gazzaniga MS, editor. The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1994: 1341-56.
27. Neville HJ, Kutas M, Chesney G, Schmidt AL. Event-related brain potentials during initial encoding and recognition memory of congruous and incongruous words. J Mem Lang 1986; 25: 75-92.
28. Palier KA, Kutas M. Brain potentials during memory retrieval provide neurophysiological support for the distinction between conscious recollection and priming. J Cognit Neurosci 1992; 4: 375-91.
29. Palier KA, Kutas M, McIsaac HK. Monitoring conscious recollection via the electrical activity of the brain. Psychol Sci 1995; 6: 107-11.
30. Potter DD, Pickles CD, Roberts RC, Rugg MD. The effects of scopolamine on event-related potentials in a continuous recognition memory task. Psychophysiology 1992; 29: 29-37.
31. Rajaram S. Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past. Mem Cognit 1993; 21: 89-102.
32. Richardson-Klavehn A, Bjork RA. Measures of memory. Annu Rev Psychol 1988; 39: 475-543.
33. Rugg MD. ERP studies of memory. In: Rugg MD, Coles MGH, editors. Electrophysiology of mind: event-related brain potentials and cognition. London: Oxford University Press, 1994: 113-27.
34. Rugg MD. Cognitive event-related potentials: Intracranial and lesion studies. In: Baron JC, Grafman J, editors. Handbook of Neuropsychology, Vol. 10. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995: 165-86.
35. Rugg MD, Doyle MC. Event-related potentials and recognition memory for low- and high-frequency words. J Cognit Neurosci 1992; 4: 69-79.
36. Rugg MD, Roberts RC, Potter DD, Pickles CD, Nagy ME. Eventrelated potentials related to recognition memory. Brain 1991; 114: 2313-32.
37. Rugg MD, Cox CJC, Doyle MC, Wells T. Event-related potentials and the recollection of low and high frequency words. Neuropsychologia 1995; 33: 471-84.
38. Schacter DL, Harbluk JL, McLachlan DR. Retrieval without recollection: an experimental analysis of source amnesia. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 1984; 23: 593-611.
39. Shimamura AP, Squire LR. A neuropsychological study of fact memory and source amnesia. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1987; 13: 464-73.
40. Smith ME. Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgements. J Cognit Neurosci 1993; 5: 1-13.
41. Smith ME, Halgren E. Dissociation of recognition memory components following temporal lobe lesions. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1989; 15: 50-60.
42. Snodgrass JG, Corwin J. Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. J Exp Psychol Gen 1988; 117: 34-50.
43. Squire LR. Declarative and nondeclarative memory: multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. In: Schacter DL, Tulving E, editors. Memory systems 1994. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1994: 203-31.
44. Squire LR, Knowlton B, Musen G. The structure and organization of memory. [Review]. Annu Rev Psychol 1993; 44: 453-95.
45. Teyler TJ, DiScenna P. The hippocampal memory indexing theory. Behav Neurosci 1986; 100: 147-54.
46. Van Petten C, Kutas M, Kluender R, Mitchiner M, McIsaac H. Fractionating the word repetition effect with event-related potentials. J Cognit Neurosci 1991; 3: 131-50.
47. Whittlesea BWA. Illusions of familiarity. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1993; 19: 1235-53.
48. Wilding EL, Doyle MC, Rugg MD. Recognition memory with and without retrieval of context: an event-related potential study. Neuropsychologia 1995; 33: 743-67.
49. Yonelinas AP. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1994: 20: 1341-54.