Chaperones divide yeast proteins into classes of expression level and evolutionary rate

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 618-625

  Bogumil, David ^a   Landan, Giddy ^a,b   Ilhan, Judith ^a   Dagan, Tal ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b University of Houston   (United States)

Author keywords

Codon usage; Community structure; Networks; Protein folding

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CHAPERONE; FUNGAL PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; CODON; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MUTATION RATE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; CODON; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOLECULAR CHAPERONES; MUTATION RATE; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84865443781     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evs025     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 19:716-723.
2. Ashburner M, et al. 2000. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 25:25-29. (Pubitemid 30257031)
3. Bogumil D, Dagan T. 2010. Chaperonin-dependent accelerated substitution rates in prokaryotes. Genome Biol Evol. 2:602-608.
4. Cannarozzi G, et al. 2010. A role for codon order in translation dynamics. Cell 141:355-367.
5. Cherry JM, et al. 1997. Genetic and physical maps of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 387:67-73. (Pubitemid 27334668)
6. Conz C, et al. 2007. Functional characterization of the atypical Hsp70 subunit of yeast ribosome-associated complex. J Biol Chem. 282:33977-33984. (Pubitemid 350159440)
7. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2011. ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 27:1164-1175.
8. Dobson CM. 2003. Protein folding and misfolding. Nature 426:884-890. (Pubitemid 38056880)
9. Drummond DA, Bloom JD, Adami C, Wilke CO, Arnold FH. 2005. Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102:14338-14343. (Pubitemid 41429699)
10. Drummond DA, Wilke CO. 2008. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134:341-352. (Pubitemid 352010328)
11. Ellis RJ. 1987. Proteins as molecular chaperones. Nature 328:378-379.
12. Esser C, et al. 2004. A genome phylogeny for mitochondria among alpha-proteobacteria and a predominantly eubacterial ancestry of yeast nuclear genes. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1643-1660. (Pubitemid 39096881)
13. Fares MA, Ruiz-Gonzalez MX, Moya A, Elena SF, Barrio E. 2002. GroEL buffers against deleterious mutations. Nature 417:398.
14. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Steinmetz LM, Scharfe C, Feldman MW. 2002. Evolutionary rate in the protein interaction network. Science 296:750-752. (Pubitemid 34442006)
15. Gautschi M, et al. 2001. RAC, a stable ribosome-associated complex in yeast formed by the DnaK-DnaJ homologs Ssz1p and zuotin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 98:3762-3767. (Pubitemid 32249845)
16. Geiler-Samerotte KA, et al. 2011. Misfolded proteins impose a dosagedependent fitness cost and trigger a cytosolic unfolded protein response in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108:680-685.
17. Ghaemmaghami S, et al. 2003. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425:737-741. (Pubitemid 37314318)
18. Gong Y, et al. 2009. An atlas of chaperone-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications to protein folding pathways in the cell. Mol Syst Biol. 5:275.
19. Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, Jacobzone M, Mercier R. 1981. Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 9:43-74.
20. Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 52:696-704. (Pubitemid 37365050)
21. Gupta RS. 1995. Evolution of the chaperonin families (Hsp60, Hsp10 and Tcp-1) of proteins and the origin of eukaryotic cells. Mol Microbiol. 15:1-11.
22. Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M. 2009. Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 16:574-581.
23. Horwich AL, Apetri AC, Fenton WA. 2009. The GroEL/GroES cis cavity as a passive anti-aggregation device. FEBS Lett. 583:2654-2662.
24. Huh WK, et al. 2003. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425:686-691.
25. Jones DT. 1999. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol. 292:195-202. (Pubitemid 29435759)
26. Kampinga HH, Craig EA. 2010. The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 11:579-592.
27. Katoh K, Kuma KI, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:511-518. (Pubitemid 40360980)
28. Kerner MJ, et al. 2005. Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonindependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell 122:209-220. (Pubitemid 41032985)
29. Krylov DM, Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV. 2003. Gene loss, protein sequence divergence, gene dispensability, expression level, and interactivity are correlated in eukaryotic evolution. Genome Res. 13:2229-2235. (Pubitemid 37265987)
30. Newman MEJ. 2006. Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Phys Rev E. 74:036104.
31. Pál C, Papp B, Hurst LD. 2001. Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. Genetics 158:927-931. (Pubitemid 32552328)
32. Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ. 2006. An integrated view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 7:337-348.
33. Queitsch C, Sangster TA, Lindquist S. 2002. Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature 417:618-623.
34. Rospert S, et al. 1993. Identification and functional analysis of chaperonin 10, the groES homolog from yeast mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 90:10967-10971. (Pubitemid 23354349)
35. Rutherford SL. 2003. Between genotype and phenotype: protein chaperones and evolvability. Nat Rev Genet. 4:264-274.
36. Sharp PM, Li WH. 1987. The codon adaptation index - a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15:1281-1295.
37. Shorter J, Lindquist S. 2008. Hsp104, Hsp70 and Hsp40 interplay regulates formation, growth and elimination of Sup35 prions. EMBO J. 27:2712-2724.
38. Stark C, et al. 2006. Biogrid: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:535-539.
39. Szklarczyk D, et al. 2011. The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored. Nucleic Acids Res. 39:561-568.
40. Tokuriki N, Tawfik DS. 2009. Chaperonin overexpression promotes genetic variation and enzyme evolution. Nature 459:668-673.
41. Tuller T, et al. 2010. An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation. Cell 141:344-354.
42. Voos W, Röttgers K. 2003. Molecular chaperones as essential mediators of mitochondrial biogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1592:51-62.
43. Wapinski I, Pfeffer A, Friedman N, Regev A. 2007. Natural history and evolutionary principles of gene duplication in fungi. Nature 449:54-61. (Pubitemid 47373776)
44. Warnecke T, Hurst LD. 2010. GroEL dependency affects codon usage - support for a critical role of misfolding in gene evolution. Mol Syst Biol. 6:340.
45. Yang JR, Zhuang SM, Zhang J. 2010. Impact of translational errorinduced and error-free misfolding on the rate of protein evolution. Mol Syst Biol. 6:421.
46. Young JC, Agashe VR, Siegers K, Hartl FU. 2004. Pathways of chaperone-mediated protein folding in the cytosol. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 5:781-791. (Pubitemid 39336272)