Frequency matrix approach demonstrates high sequence quality in Avian BARCODEs and highlights cryptic pseudogenes

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2012, Pages

  Stoeckle, Mark Y ^a   Kerr, Kevin C R ^b  

^a ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE 1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIRD; DNA BARCODING; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC IDENTIFICATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; POSITION WEIGHT MATRIX; PSEUDOGENE; QUALITY CONTROL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION; STOP CODON; SYSTEMATIC ERROR;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BIRDS; DATABASES, GENETIC; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PSEUDOGENES; QUALITY CONTROL; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84865412170     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043992     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Hebert PDN, Cywinkska A, Ball SL, de WaardJR, (2003) Biological identifications through barcodes. Proc R Soc London B 270: 313-322.
2. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN, (2007) BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 355-364.
3. Casiraghi M, Labra M, Ferri E, Galimberti A, De Mattia F, (2010) DNA barcoding: a six-question tour to improve users' awareness about the method. Brief Bioinform 11: 440-453.
4. Consortium for the Barcode of Life Database Working Group (2009) Data standards for BARCODE records in INSDC (BRIs). Available: http://www.barcoding.si.edu/pdf/dwg_data_standards-final.pdf. Accessed: 2012 April 4.
5. Frézal L, Leblois R, (2008) Four years of DNA barcoding: current advances and prospects. Infect Genet Evol 8: 727-736.
6. Jingo U, Kato T, Ito M, (2011) Current progress in DNA barcoding and future implications for entomology. Entomol Sci 14: 107-124.
7. Moritz C, Cicero C, (2004) DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biol 2: 1529-1531.
8. Dasmahapatra KK, Elias M, Hill RI, Hoffman JI, Mallet J, (2009) Mitchondrial DNA barcoding detects some species that are real and some that are not. Mol Ecol Res 10: 264-273.
9. Aliabadian M, Kaboli M, Nijman V, Vences M, (2009) Molecular identification of birds: performance of distance-based DNA barcoding in three genes to delimit parapatric species. PLoS ONE 4: e4119.
10. Baker AJ, Tavares ES, Elbourne R, (2009) Countering criticisms of single mitochondrial gene barcoding in birds. Mol Ecol Res 9: 257-268.
11. Tavares ES, Goncalves P, Miyaki CY, Baker AJ, (2011) DNA barcode detects high genetic structure within neotropical bird species. PLoS ONE 6: e28543.
12. Barraclough TG, (2010) Evolving entities: towards a unified framework for understanding diversity at the species and higher levels. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 365: 1801-1813.
13. Sirovich L, Stoeckle MY, Zhang Y, (2010) A structural analysis of biodiversity. PLoS ONE 5: e2966.
14. Longo MD, O'Neill MJ, O'Neill RJ, (2011) Abundant human DNA contamination identified in non-primate genome databases. PLoS ONE 6: e16410.
15. Vilgalys R, (2003) Taxonomic misidentification in public DNA databases. New Phytol 160: 4-5.
16. Meier R, Shiyang K, Vaidya G, Ng PK, (2006) DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst Biol 55: 715-728.
17. Hebert PDN, Stoeckle MY, Zemlak TS, Francis CM, (2004) Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLOS Biol 2: 1657-1663.
18. Kerr KCR, Stoeckle MY, Dove CJ, Weigt LA, Francis CM, et al. (2007) Comprehensive DNA barcode coverage of North American birds. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 535-543.
19. Kerr KCR, Birks SM, Kalyakin MV, Red'kin YA, Koblik EA, et al. (2009) Filling the gap - COI barcode resolution in eastern Palearctic birds. Frontiers Zoology 6: 29.
20. Kerr KCR, Litjmaer DA, Barreira AS, Hebert PDN, Tubaro PL, (2009) Probing evolutionary patterns in Neotropical birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS ONE 4: e379.
21. Vilaça ST, Lacerda DR, Sari EHR, Santos FR, (2006) DNA-based identification applied to Thamnophilidae (Passeriformes) species: the first barcodes of Neotropical birds. Rev Bras Ornitol 14: 7-13.
22. Yoo HS, Eah JY, Kim JS, Min MS, Paek WK, et al. (2006) DNA barcoding Korean birds. Mol Cell 22: 323-327.
23. Schindel DE, Stoeckle MY, Milensky CM, Trizna M, Schmidt BK, et al. (2011) Project Description: DNA Barcodes of Bird Species in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, USA. ZooKeys 152: 87-91.
24. Johnsen A, Rindal E, Ericson PGP, Zuccon D, Kerr KCR, et al. (2010) DNA barcoding of Scandanavian birds reveals divergent lineages in trans-Atlantic species. J Ornithol 151: 565-578.
25. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M, (2004) MEGA3: integrated software for molecular evolutionary genetics analysis and sequence alignment. Brief Bioinform 5: 150-163.
26. Edgar RC, (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucl Acids Res 32: 1792-1797.
27. Proutski V, Holmes EC, (1998) SWAN: a sliding window analysis of nucleotide sequence variability. Bioinformatics 14: 467-468.
28. Cha RS, Thilly WG, (1993) Specificity, efficiency, and fidelity of PCR. PCR Method Appl 3: S18-S29.
29. Frey JE, Frey B, (2004) Origin of intra-individual variation in PCR-amplified mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I of Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae): mitochondrial heteroplasmy or nuclear integration. Hereditas 140: 92-98.
30. Song H, Buhay JE, Whiting MF, Crandall KA, (2008) Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 13486-13491.
31. Dunshea G, Barros NB, Wells RS, Gales NJ, Hindell MA, et al. (2008) Pseudogenes and DNA-based diet analyses: a cautionary tale from a relatively well sampled predator-prey system. Bull Entomol Res 98: 239-248.
32. Sorenson MD, Quinn TW, (1998) Numts: a challenge for avian systematics and population biology. Auk 115: 214-221.
33. Mirol PM, Mascheretti S, Searle JB, (1999) Multiple nuclear pseudogenes of mitochondrial cytochrome b in Ctenomys (Caviomorpha, Rodentia) with either great similarity to or high divergence from the true mitochondrial sequence. Heredity 84: 538-547.
34. Ramos A, Barbena E, Mateiu L, González MM, Mairal Q, et al. (2011) Nuclear insertions of mitochondrial origin: database updating and usefulness in cancer studies. Mitochondrion 11: 946-953.
35. Dubey S, Michaux, Brunner H, Hütterer, Vogel P, (2009) False phylogenies on wood mice due to cryptic cytochrome-b pseudogene. Mol Phylogenet Evol 50: 633-641.
36. Kerr KCR, (2010) A cryptic, intergeneric cytochrome c oxidase I pseudogene in tyrant flycatchers (family: Tyrannidae). Genome 53: 1103-1109.
37. Menashe I, Aloni R, Lancet D, (2006) A probabilistic classifier for olfactory receptor pseudogenes. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 393.
38. Coin L, Durbin R, (2004) Improved techniques for the identification of pseudogenes. Bioinformatics 20(suppl 1): i94-i100.
39. Campagna L, Geale K, Handford P, Lijtmaer DA, Tubaro PL, (2011) A molecular phylogeny of the Sierra-Finches (Phrygilus, Passeriformes): extreme polyphyly in a group of Andean specialists. Mol Phylogenet Evol 61: 521-533.
40. Kwon YS, Kim JH, Choe JC, Park YC (2012) Low resolution of mitochondrial COI barcodes for identifying species of the genus Larus (Charadriiformes: Laridae). Mitochondrial DNA 2012 March 13.
41. Kraytsberg Y, Khrapko K, (2005) Single-molecule PCR: an artifact-free PCR approach for the analysis of somatic mutations. Exper Rev Mol Diagnostics 5: 1-7.
42. Dawson K, Thorpe RS, Malhotra A, (2010) Estimating genetic variability in non-model taxa: a general procedure for discriminating sequence errors from actual variation. PLoS ONE 5: e15204.
43. Kobayashi N, Tamura K, Aotsuka T, (1999) PCR error and population genetics. Biochem Genet 37: 317-321.
44. Cummings SM, McMullan M, Joyce DA, van Oosterhout C, (2010) Solutions for PCR, cloning, and sequencing errors in population genetic analysis. Conserv Genet 11: 1095-1097.
45. Li M, Wang IX, Li Y, Bruzel A, Richards AL, et al. (2011) Widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome. Science 333: 53-58.
46. Moilanen JS, Majamaa K, (2003) Phylogenetic network and physicochemical properties of nonsynonymous mutations in the protein-coding genes of human mitochondrial DNA. Mol Biol Evol 20: 1195-1210.
47. Hasegawa M, Cao Y, Yang ZH, (1998) Preponderance of slightly deleterious polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: nonsynonymous/synonymous rate ratio is much higher within species than between species. Mol Biol Evol 15: 1499.
48. Fry AJ, (1999) Mildly deleterious mutations in avian mitochondrial DNA: evidence from neutrality tests. Evolution 53: 1617-1620.
49. Rand DM, Kann LM, (1996) Excess amino acid polymorphism in mitochondrial DNA: contrasts among genes from Drosophila, mice, and humans. Mol Biol Evol 13: 735-748.
50. Kleinman CL, Majewski J, (2012) Comment on "Widespread RNA and DNA sequence differences in the human transcriptome". Science 335: 1302.
51. Hayden EC (2012) RNA editing under intense scrutiny. Nature News March 15, 2012.
52. Abramson J, Svensson-Ek M, Byrne B, Iwata S, (2001) Structure of cytochrome c oxidase: a comparison of the bacterial and mitochondrial enzymes. Biochimica Biophysica Acta 11544: 1-9.
53. Michel H, Behr J, Harrenga A, Kannt A, (1998) Cytochrome c oxidase: structure and spectroscopy. Ann Rev Biophysic Biomol Struct 27: 329-356.
54. Tsukihara T, Aoyama H, Yamashita E, Tomizaki T, Yamaguchi H, et al. (1996) The whole structure of the 13-subunit oxidized cytochrome c oxidase at 2.8 angstrom. Science 272: 1136-1144.
55. Oshikawa S, (2003) A cytochrome c oxidase proton pumping mechanism that excludes the O2 reduction site. FEBS Lett 555: 8-12.
56. Blouin MS, Yowell CA, Courtney CH, Dame JB, (1998) Substitution bias, rapid saturation, and the use of mtDNA for nematode systematics. Mol Biol Evol 15: 1719-1727.
57. Ward RD, Holmes BH, (2007) An analysis of nucleotide and amino acid variability in the barcode region of cytochrome c oxidase I (cox1) in fishes. Mol Ecol Notes 7: 899-907.
58. Kerr KCR, (2011) Searching for evidence of selection in avian DNA barcodes. Mol Ecol Res 11: 1045-1055.