Assessing the level of structural integration using Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD): Implicationsfor DSM-5

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 94, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 522-532

  Zimmermann, Johannes ^a   Ehrenthal, Johannes C ^b   Cierpka, Manfred ^b   Schauenburg, Henning ^b   Doering, Stephan ^c   Benecke, Cord ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMAN; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; HUMANS; PERSONALITY; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84865225738     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2012.700664     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., and, Pincus, A. L. 1990. Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55: 521-536. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674088
2. American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, (4th ed., text revision), Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
3. Azim, H. F. A., Piper, W. E., Segal, P. M., Nixon, G. W. H., and, Duncan, S. 1991. The quality of object relations scale. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 55: 323-343.
4. Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., and, Skodol, A. E. 2011. Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, Part I: A review of theory and methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93: 332-346. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.583808
5. Benecke, C., Koschier, A., Peham, D., Bock, A., Dahlbender, R. W., Biebl, W., and, Doering, S. 2009. Erste Ergebnisse zu Reliabilitt und Validitt der OPD-2 Strukturachse [First results on the reliability and validity of the OPD-2 axis structure]. Zeitschrift fr Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 55: 84-96.
6. Bernardi, R. 2010. DSM-5, OPD-2 y PDM: Convergencias y divergencias entre los nuevos sistemas diagnósticos psiquiátrico y psicoanalticos [DSM-5, OPD-2, and PDM: Commonalities and differences of new psychiatric and psychoanalytic diagnostic systems]. Revista de Psiquiatra del Uruguay, 74: 179-205.
7. Blatt, S. J., Chevron, E. S., Quinlan, D. M., Schaffer, C. E., and, Wein, S. 1992. The assessment of qualitative and structural dimensions of object representations, New Haven, CT: Unpublished manuscript, Yale University.
8. Bker, H., Himmighoffen, H., Straub, M., Schopper, C., Endrass, J., Kchenhoff, B., and, Hell, D. 2008. Deliberate self-harm in female patients with affective disorders: Investigation of personality structure and affect regulation by means of operationalized psychodynamic diagnostics. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 2196: 743-751. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181879daf
9. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., and, Rothstein, H. R. 2009. Introduction to meta-analysis, Chichester, UK: Wiley.
10. Bornstein, R. F. 2003. Behaviorally referenced experimentation and symptom validation: A paradigm for 21st-century personality disorder research. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17: 1-18. doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.1.1.24056 (Pubitemid 36343236)
11. Bornstein, R. F. 2011. Reconceptualizing personality pathology in DSM-5: Limitations in evidence for eliminating dependent personality disorder and other DSM-IV syndromes. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25: 235-247. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.235
12. Bronisch, T., Hiller, W., Zaudig, M., and, Mombour, W. 1995. IDCL-PInternationale Diagnosen Checklisten fr Persnlichkeitsstrungen nach ICD-10 und DSM-IV (Manual) [IDCL-P: International Diagnostic Checklists for Personality Disorders according to ICD-10 and DSM-IV (Manual)], Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
13. Cierpka, M., Grande, T., Rudolf, G., von der Tann, M., and, Stasch, M. 2007. The Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics system: Clinical relevance, reliability and validity. Psychopathology, 40: 209-220. doi: 10.1159/000101363 (Pubitemid 46717835)
14. Cierpka, M., Grande, T., Stasch, M., Oberbracht, C., Schneider, W., Schler, G., and, Schneider, G. 2001. Zur Validitt der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik (OPD)) [About the validity of the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD)]. Psychotherapeut, 46: 122-133. (Pubitemid 32274701)
15. Clark, L. 2007. Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: Perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization. Annual Review of Psychology, 58: 227-257. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190200
16. Clarkin, J. F., Caligor, E., Stern, B. L., and, Kernberg, O. F. 2004. Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO), New York, NY: Unpublished manuscript, Personality Disorders Institute, Weill Medical College of Cornell University.
17. Cohen, J. 1968. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70: 213-220. doi: 10.1037/h0026256
18. Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Crawford, M. J., Koldobsky, N., Mulder, R., and, Tyrer, P. 2011. Classifying personality disorder according to severity. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25: 321-330. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.321
20. Dahlbender, R. W., Rudolf, G., OPD Task Force and Task Force PDM. 2006. Psychic structure and mental functioning: Current research on the reliable measurement and clinical validity of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD) System. In Psychodynamic diagnostic manual, 615-662. Silver Spring, MD: Alliance of Psychoanalytic Organizations.
21. Derogatis, L. R. 1977. SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual-I for the R(evised) version, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine.
22. Derogatis, L. R. 1993. Brief Symptom Inventory: Administration, scoring and procedures manual (4th ed.), Minneapolis, MN: NCS, Pearson.
23. Doering, S., Burgmer, M., Heuft, G., Menke, B., Feldmann, M., Lbking, M., and, Schneider, G. 2012. Validity of the Levels of Structural Integration Axis of the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD). Manuscript in preparation.
24. Ehrenthal, J. C., Dinger, U., Horsch, L., Komo-Lang, M., Klinkerfu, M., Grande, T., and, Schauenburg, H. 2012. Der OPD-Strukturfragebogen (OPD-SF): Erste Ergebnisse zu Reliabilitt und Validitt [The OPD structure questionnaire (OPD-SQ). First results on reliability and validity]. Psychosomatik, Psychotherapie, Medizinische Psychologie, 62: 25-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295481
25. First, M. B., Gibbon, M., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., and, Benjamin, L. S. 1997. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II personality disorders (SCID-II), Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
26. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., and, Williams, J. B. W. 2002. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I disorders (SCID-I), New York, NY: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
27. Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, H., and, Steele, M. 1998. Reflective-functioning manual, version 5.0, for application to adult attachment interviews, London, UK: University College London.
28. Gamache, D., Laverdiere, O., Diguer, L., Hebert, E., Larochelle, S., and, Descoteaux, J. 2009. The Personality Organization Diagnostic Form: Development of a revised version. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197: 368-377. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181a20897
29. Grande, T., Dilg, R., Jakobsen, T., Keller, W., Krawietz, B., Langer, M., and, Rudolf, G. 2006. Differential effects of two forms of psychoanalytic therapy: Results of the Heidelberg-Berlin study. Psychotherapy Research, 16: 470-485. doi: 10.1080/10503300600608082 (Pubitemid 43932031)
30. Grande, T., Dilg, R., Jakobsen, T., Keller, W., Krawietz, B., Langer, M., and, Rudolf, G. 2009. Structural change as a predictor of long-term follow-up outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 19: 344-357. doi: 10.1080/10503300902914147
31. Grande, T., Rudolf, G., and, Oberbracht, C. 1998. Die Strukturachse der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik (OPD): Forschungsergebnisse zum Konzept und zur klinischen Anwendung [The structure axis of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD): Research findings on its concept and clinical application]. Persnlichkeitsstrungen, 2: 173-182.
32. Grande, T., Rudolf, G., and, Oberbracht, C. 2000. Was leistet die OPD? Empirische Befunde und klinische Erfahrungen mit der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik. In Vernderungsmessung auf OPD-Basis: Schwierigkeiten und ein neues Konzept [OPD-based assessment of change: Difficulties and a new concept], Edited by: Schneider, W. and Freyberger, H. J. 148-161. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
33. Grande, T., Schauenburg, H., and, Rudolf, G. 2002. Die Struktur der Persnlichkeit: Vom theoretischen Verstndnis zur therapeutischen Anwendung des psychodynamischen Strukturkonzepts. In Zum Begriff Struktur in verschiedenen Operationalisierungen. Ein empirischer Vergleich der Scales of Psychological Capacities und der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik [Different operationalizations of the concept of structure: An empirical comparison of the Scales of Psychological Capacities and the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis], Edited by: Rudolf, G., Grande, T. and Henningsen, P. 177-196. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer.
34. Grtering, T. B., and, Schauenburg, H. 2000. Leitlinien in der stationren Psychotherapie: Pro und Kontra. In Die Erfassung psychodynamisch relevanter PersnlichkeitsmerkmaleVergleich zweier klinischer Instrumente: Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile (KAPP) und OPD-Strukturachse [Assessment of psychodynamically relevant personality traits: A comparison of the clinical instruments Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile (KAPP) and OPD structure axis], Edited by: Bassler, M. 115-136. Gieen, Germany: Psychosozial.
35. Hill, A., Ujeyl, M., Habermann, N., Berner, W., and, Briken, P. 2008. Schuldfhigkeit bei sexuellen Ttungsdelikten [Criminal responsibility in sexual homicide perpetrators]. Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie, 76: 343-353. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038194 (Pubitemid 351986624)
36. Hopwood, C. J., Malone, J. C., Ansell, E. B., Sanislow, C. A., Grillo, C. M., McGlashan, T. H., and, Morey, L. C. 2011. Personality assessment in DSM-5: Empirical support for rating severity, style, and traits. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25: 305-320. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.3.305
37. Horowitz, L. M. 2004. Interpersonal foundations of psychopathology, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10727-000
38. Kernberg, O. F., and, Caligor, E. 2005. A psychoanalytic theory of personality disorders. In Major theories of personality disorder, (2nd ed., Edited by: Lenzenweger, M. F. and Clarkin, J. F. 114-156. New York, NY: Guilford.
39. Kraemer, H. C., Kupfer, D. J., Clarke, D. E., Narrow, W. E., and, Regier, D. A. 2012. DSM-5: How reliable is reliable enough?. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169: 13-15. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11010050
40. Krueger, R. F., Eaton, N. R., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., and, Skodol, A. E. 2011. Personality in DSM-5: Helping delineate personality disorder content and framing the metastructure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93: 325-331. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.577478
41. Leichsenring, F. 1999. Development and first results of the Borderline Personality Inventory: A self-report instrument for assessing borderline personality organization. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73: 45-63. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA730104 (Pubitemid 29402560)
42. Leising, D., Krause, S., Khler, D., Hinsen, K., and, Clifton, A. 2011. Assessing interpersonal functioning: Views from within and without. Journal of Research in Personality, 45: 631-641. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2011.08.011
43. Leising, D., and, Zimmermann, J. 2011. An integrative conceptual framework for assessing personality and personality pathology. Review of General Psychology, 15: 317-330. doi: 10.1037/a0025070
44. Lenzenweger, M. F., Clarkin, J. F., Kernberg, O. F., and, Foelsch, P. A. 2001. The Inventory of Personality Organization: Psychometric properties, factorial composition, and criterion relations with affect, aggressive dyscontrol, psychosis proneness, and self-domains in a nonclinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 13: 577-591. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.577 (Pubitemid 34024789)
45. Livesley, W. J. 1998. Suggestions for a framework for an empirically based classification of personality disorder. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 43: 137-147. (Pubitemid 28168987)
46. Livesley, W. J. 2012. Tradition versus empiricism in the current DSM-5 proposal for revising the classification of personality disorders. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 22: 81-90. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1826
47. Mestel, R., Klingelhfer, J., Dahlbender, R. W., and, Schler, G. 2004. Lernen an der Praxis: OPD und Qualittssicherung in der Psychodynamischen Psychotherapie. In Validitt der OPD-Achsen Konflikt und Struktur in der stationren psychosomatischen Rehabilitation [Validity of the OPD conflict and structure axes in inpatient psychotherapy], Edited by: Dahlbender, R. W., Buchheim, P. and Schler, G. 229-244. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
48. Meyer, B., and, Pilkonis, P. A. 2005. An attachment model of personality disorders. In Major theories of personality disorder, (2nd ed., Edited by: Lenzenweger, M. F. and Clarkin, J. F. 231-281. New York, NY: Guilford.
49. Morey, L. C., Berghuis, H., Bender, D. S., Verheul, R., Krueger, R. F., and, Skodol, A. E. 2011. Toward a model for assessing level of personality functioning in DSM-5, Part II: Empirical articulation of a core dimension of personality pathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93: 347-353. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2011.577853
50. Mller, C., Kaufhold, J., Overbeck, G., and, Grabhorn, R. 2006. The importance of reflective functioning to the diagnosis of psychic structure. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 79: 485-494. doi: 10.1348/14760830568048 (Pubitemid 44935669)
51. Nitzgen, D., and, Brnger, M. 2000. Was leistet die OPD? Empirische Befunde und klinische Erfahrungen mit der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik. In Operationalisierte Psychodynamische Diagnostik in der Rehabilitationsklinik Birkenbuck: Einsatz und Befunde [Operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis in the inpatient psychotherapeutic clinic Birkenbuck: Application and results], Edited by: Schneider, W. and Freyberger, H. J. 238-252. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
52. OPD Task Force. 2001. Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD): Foundations and manual, Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
53. OPD Task Force. 2008. Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis OPD-2: Manual of diagnosis and treatment planning, Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
54. Parker, G., Both, L., Olley, A., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., Irvine, P., and, Jacobs, G. 2002. Defining disordered personality functioning. Journal of Personality Disorders, 16: 503-522. doi: 10.1521/pedi.16.6.503.22139 (Pubitemid 36176968)
55. Pilkonis, P. A., Hallquist, M. N., Morse, J. Q., and, Stepp, S. D. 2011. Striking the (im)proper balance between scientific advances and clinical utility: Commentary on the DSM-5 proposal for personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2: 68-82. doi: 10.1037/a0022226
56. Pincus, A. L. 2011. Some comments on nomology, diagnostic process, and narcissistic personality disorder in the DSM-5 proposal for personality and personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2: 41-53. doi: 10.1037/a0021191
57. Rudolf, G. 2002. Die Struktur der Persnlichkeit. Vom theoretischen Verstndnis zur therapeutischen Anwendung des psychodynamischen Strukturkonzepts. In Struktur als psychodynamisches Konzept der Persnlichkeit [Structure as a psychodynamic concept of personality], Edited by: Rudolf, G., Grande, T. and Henningsen, P. 2-48. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer.
58. Rudolf, G., and, Doering, S. 2012. Handbuch der Strukturdiagnostik. Konzepte, Instrumente, Praxis. In Die Strukturachse der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik (OPD) [The structure axis of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD)], Edited by: Doering, S. and Hrz, S. 87-121. Stuttgart, Germany: Schattauer.
59. Rudolf, G., Grande, T., Oberbracht, C., and, Jakobsen, T. 1996. Erste empirische Untersuchungen zu einem neuen diagnostischen System: Die Operationalisierte Psychodynamische Diagnostik (OPD) [First empirical investigations on a new diagnostic system: The Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD)]. Zeitschrift fr Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 42: 343-357.
60. Schauenburg, H. 2000. Was leistet die OPD? Empirische Befunde und klinische Erfahrungen mit der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik. In Zum Verhltnis von Bindungsdiagnostik und psychodynamischer Diagnostik [The relation between attachment diagnosis and psychodynamic diagnosis], Edited by: Schneider, W. and Freyberger, H. J. 196-217. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
61. Schauenburg, H., and, Grande, T. 2011. Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, therapeutic interventions. In Interview measures of interpersonal functioning and quality of object relations, Edited by: Horowitz, L. M. and Strack, S. 343-358. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
62. Schneider, G., Lange, C., and, Heuft, G. 2002. Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics and differential therapy indication in routine diagnostics at a psychosomatic outpatient department. Psychotherapy Research, 12: 159-178. doi: 10.1093/ptr/12.2.159 (Pubitemid 40990866)
63. Schneider, G., Mendler, T., Heuft, G., and, Burgmer, M. 2008. Der Krper in der Konflikt-und Strukturdiagnostik der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen DiagnostikBezug zu Krperkonzepten in der Selbstauskunft [The body in Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD) Its representation on the axes Conflicts and Structure and correlations to self-assessment]. Zeitschrift fr Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 54: 132-149. (Pubitemid 351792043)
64. Schneider, W., Buchheim, P., Cierpka, M., Dahlbender, R., Freyberger, H. J., Grande, T., and, Schler, G. 2002. Rethinking the DSM: Psychological perspectives. In Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD): A new diagnostic approach in psychodynamic psychotherapy, Edited by: Beutler, L. E. and Malik, M. 177-201. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10456-007
65. Shedler, J., Beck, A., Fonagy, P., Gabbard, G. O., Gunderson, J., Kernberg, O., and, Westen, D. 2010. Personality disorders in DSM-5. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167: 1026-1028. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10050746
66. Skodol, A. E. 2012. Personality disorders in DSM-5. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 8: 317-344. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143131
67. Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., Clark, L. A., Oldham, J. M., Alarcon, R. D., and, Siever, L. J. 2011. Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorder, 25: 136-169. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25. 2.136
68. Skodol, A. E., Clark, L. A., Bender, D. S., Krueger, R. F., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., and, Oldham, J. M. 2011. Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part I: Description and rationale. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2: 4-22. doi: 10.1037/a0021891
69. Spitzer, C., Michels-Lucht, F., Siebel, U., and, Freyberger, H. J. 2002a. Die Strukturachse der operationalisierten psychodynamischen Diagnostik (OPD): Zusammenhnge mit soziodemographischen, klinischen und psychopathologischen Merkmalen sowie kategorialen Diagnosen [The axis structure of the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD): Its relationship with sociodemographic, clinical and psychopathological features as well as categorical diagnoses]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 52: 392-397. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34290
70. Spitzer, C., Michels-Lucht, F., Siebel, U., and, Freyberger, H. J. 2002b. Zur Konstruktvaliditt der Strukturachse der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik [On the validity of the axis structure of operationalized psychodynamic diagnostics]. Zeitschrift fr Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 48: 299-312. (Pubitemid 35315093)
71. Spitzer, C., Michels-Lucht, F., Siebel, U., and, Freyberger, H. J. 2004. Zum Zusammenhang zwischen OPD-Merkmalen der Persnlichkeitsstruktur und symptombezogenen sowie interpersonalen Behandlungsergebnissen stationrer Psychotherapie [The relationship between OPD features of personality structure and symptom-related and interpersonal outcome of inpatient psychotherapy]. Zeitschrift fr Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 50: 70-85. (Pubitemid 38232974)
72. Strau, B., Httmann, B., and, Schulz, N. 1997. Kategorienhufigkeit und prognostische Bedeutung einer operationalisierten psychodynamischen Diagnostik. Erste Erfahrungen mit der OPD-1 im stationren Rahmenn [Category distribution and prognostic significance of operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis. Initial experiences with OPD-1 in inpatient psychotherapy]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 47: 58-63. (Pubitemid 27119563)
73. Thomasius, R., Weiler, D., Sack, P.-M., Schindler, A., Gemeinhardt, B., Schuhbert, C., and, Kstner, U. 2001. Validitt der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik (OPD) bei familientherapeutisch behandelten Drogenabhngigen im adoleszenten und jungen Erwachsenenalter [Validity of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD) in the field of family therapy with adolescent and young adult drug addicts]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 51: 365-372. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16896 (Pubitemid 32889358)
74. Tyrer, P., Crawford, M., Mulder, R., Blashfield, R., Farnam, A., Fossati, A., and, Reed, G. M. 2011. The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Personality and Mental Health, 5: 246-259. doi: 10.1002/pmh.190
75. Uzdawinis, D., Edel, M. A., zgrdal, S., von Haebler, D., Hauser, M., Witthaus, H., and, Juckel, G. 2010. Operationalisierte Psychodynamische Diagnostik (OPD) bei Patienten im schizophrenen ProdromalstadiumEine explorative Studie [Operationalized psychodynamic diagnostics (OPD) in patients in a prodromal state of schizophreniaAn explorative study]. Zeitschrift fr Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 56: 150-162.
76. Wallerstein, R. S. 1991. Assessment of structural change in psychoanalytic therapy and research. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 36 (Suppl.): 241-261.
77. Weinryb, R. M., and, Rssel, R. J. 1991. Karolinska Psychodynamic ProfileKAPP. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 83 (Suppl. 363): 1-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1991.tb10573.x
78. Westen, D. 1997. Divergences between clinical and research methods for assessing personality disorders: Implications for research and the evolution of Axis II. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154: 895-903. (Pubitemid 27274530)
79. Westen, D., Barends, A., Leigh, J., Mendel, M., and, Silbert, D. 1990. Social Cognition and Object Relations Scales (SCORS), Ann Arbor, MI: Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.
80. Westen, D., Gabbard, G. O., and, Blagov, P. 2006. Personality and psychopathology. In Back to the future. Personality structure as a context for psychopathology, Edited by: Krueger, R. F. and Tackett, J. L. 335-384. New York, NY: Guilford.
81. Westen, D., and, Shedler, J. 1999. Revising and assessing Axis II, part I: Developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156: 258-272. (Pubitemid 29077118)
82. Widiger, T. A. 2011. A shaky future for personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2: 54-67. doi: 10.1037/a0021855
83. Widiger, T. A., and, Samuel, D. B. 2005. Evidence-based assessment of personality disorders. Psychological Assessment, 17: 278-287. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.278 (Pubitemid 41552363)
84. Widiger, T. A., and, Trull, T. J. 2007. Plate tectonics in the classification of personality disorder: Shifting to a dimensional model. American Psychologist, 62: 71-83. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.2.71
85. World Health Organization. 1992. ICD-10: The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines, Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
86. Zimmerman, M., Rothschild, L., and, Chelminski, I. 2005. The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 162: 1911-1918. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1911 (Pubitemid 41428621)
87. Zimmermann, J., Ehrenthal, J. C., Hrz, S., Rentrop, M., Rost, R., Schauenburg, H., and, Cierpka, M. 2010. Neue Validierungsstudien zur Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik (OPD-2)) [New validation studies on Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD-2)]. Psychotherapeut, 55: 69-73. doi: 10.1007/s00278-009-0717-z