Structural change as a predictor of long-term follow-up outcome

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 344-357

  Grande, Tilman ^a   Dilg, Reiner ^b   Jakobsen, Thorsten ^a   Keller, Wolfram ^b   Krawietz, Bärbel ^a   Langer, Monika ^a   Oberbracht, Claudia ^a   Stehle, Sabine ^b   Stennes, Margret ^b   Rudolf, Gerd ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b Theodor Wenzel Werk Berlin ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Long term psychotherapy; Outcome research; Psychoanalytic psychodynamic therapy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLOBAL SEVERITY INDEX; HEIDELBERG STRUCTURAL CHANGE SCALE; HUMAN; INVENTORY OF INTERPERSONAL PROBLEM; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOANALYSIS; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70549108868     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503300902914147     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Beutler, L. E., & Hamblin, D. L. (1986). Individualized outcome measures of internal change: Methodological considerations.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 48-53
3. Böker, H., Schopper, C., Straub, M., Himmighoffen, H., Endrass, J., Kuchenhoff, B., et al. (2007). Automutilistisches Verhalten bei Patientinnen mit affektiven Störungen: Untersuchung der Persönlichkeitsstruktur und Affektregulation mittels Operationalisierter Psychodynamischer Diagnostik (OPD) [Automutilistic behaviour in female patients with affective disorders: investigation of personality structure and affect regulation by means of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD)]. Psychotherapie. Psychosomatik und Medizinische Psychologie, 57, 319-327.
4. Brockmann, J., Schlüter, T., Brodbeck, D., & Eckert, J. (2002). Die Effekte psychoanalytisch orientierter und verhaltenstherapeutischer Langzeittherapien [Effects of psychoanalytically oriented and of behavioural long-term therapies. A comparative study]. Psychotherapeut, 47, 347-355.
5. Cierpka, M., Grande, T., Rudolf, G., van der Tann, M., Stasch, M., & OPD Task Force. (2007). The Operationalized Psycho dynamic Diagnostics system: Clinical relevance, reliability and validity. Psychopathology, 40, 209-220.
6. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
7. Connolly Gibbons, M. B., Crits-Christoph, P., Barber, J. P., & Schamberger, M. (2007). Insight in psychotherapy: A review of empirical literature. In L. G. Castonguay & C. Hill (Eds), Insight in psychotherapy (pp. 143-165). Washington, DC:American Psychological Association.
8. Derogatis, L. (1994). Symptom Checklist-90-Revised: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
9. DeWitt, K. N., Hartley, D., Rosenberg, S. E., Zilberg, N. J., & Wallerstein, R. S. (1991). Scales of Psychological Capacities: Development of an assessment approach. Psychoanalytic & Contemporary Thought, 14, 343-361.
10. Dilling, H., Mombour, W., Schmidt, M. H., & Schulte-Markwort, E. (Eds). (1994). Internationale Klassifikation psychischer Störungen ICD-10, Kapitel V(F). Forschungskriterien [International Classification of Mental Disorders ICD-10, Chapter V(F). Research criteria]. Bern, Germany: Huber.
11. Fonagy, P., Target, M., Steele, M., & Steele, H. (1998). Reflective- functioning manual: For application to Adult Attachment Interviews. Version 5.0. London: University College London.
12. Franke, G. (2002). SCL-90-R: Die Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis (2. Aufl.) [The Derogatis Symptom Checklist (2nd ed.)]. Gottingen, Germany: Beltz.
13. Grande, T. (2004). Zur Beurteilung der Leistung einzelner OPD- Rater und Standards für die Verwendung der OPD in der empirischen Forschung [Qualification of OPD raters and the use of the OPD in empirical research]. In R. W. Dahlbender, P. Buchheim, & G. Schüssler (Eds), Lernen an der Praxis. OPD und Qualitätssicherung in der Psychodynamischen Psychotherapie [Learning from practice. OPD and quality assurance in psychodynamic psychotherapy] (pp. 245-250). Bern, Germany: Huber.
14. Grande, T., Dilg, R., Jakobsen, T., Keller, W., Krawietz, B., Langer, M., et al. (2006). Differential effects of two forms of psychoanalytic therapy-Results of the Heidelberg-Berlin Study. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 470-485.
15. Grande, T., Rudolf, G., Oberbracht, C., & Jakobsen, T. (2001). Therapeutische Veränderungen jenseits der Symptomatik. Wirkungen stationärer Psychotherapie im Licht der Heidelberger Umstrukturierungsskala [Therapeutic changes beyond symptoms. The effects of inpatient psychotherapy in light of the Heidelberg Structural Change Scale]. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 47, 213-233.
16. Grande, T., Rudolf, G., Oberbracht, C., Jakobsen, T., & Keller, W. (2004). Investigating structural change in the process and outcome of psychoanalytic treatment. The Heidelberg-Berlin Study. In P. Richardson, H. Kächele, & C. Renlund (Eds), Research on psychoanalytic psychotherapy with adults (pp. 35-61). London: Karnac.
17. Grande, T., Rudolf, G., Oberbracht, C., & Pauli-Magnus, C. (2003). Progressive changes in patients' lives after psychotherapy: Which treatment effects support them? Psychotherapy Research, 13, 43-58.
18. Hill, C. E., & Lambert, M. J. (2004). Methodological issues in studying psychotherapy processes and outcome. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (pp. 84 135). New York: Wiley.
19. Horowitz, L. M., Strauss, B., & Kordy, H. (2000). Inventar zu Erfassung interpersonaler Probleme (2. Aufl.) [Inventory of Interpersonal Problems, 2nd ed.]. Göttingen, Germany: Beltz.
20. Huber, D., Henrich, G., & Klug, G. (2007). The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP): Sensitivity to change. Psychotherapy Research, 17, 474-481.
21. Kendall, P. C., Holmbeck, G., & Verduin, T. (2004). Methodology, design, and evaluation in psychotherapy research. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (pp. 16-43). New York: Wiley.
22. Kernberg, O. F. (1991). Psychic structure and structural change: An ego psychology object relations theory viewpoint. In T. Shapiro (Ed.), The concept of structure (pp. 315-337). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
23. Kernberg, O. F. (1999). Psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and supportive psychotherapy: Contemporary controversies. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 80, 1075-1091.
24. Lambert, M. J., & Hill, C. E. (1994). Assessing psychotherapy outcomes and processes. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 72-113). New York: Wiley.
25. Lambert, M. J., & Ogles, B. M. (2004). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (pp. 139-193). New York: Wiley.
26. Leuzinger-Bohleber, M. (2002). A follow-up study-Critical inspiration for our clinical practice? In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber & M. Target (Eds), Outcomes of psychoanalytic treatment (pp. 143-173). London: Whurr.
27. Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Stuhr, U., Rüger, B., & Beutel, M. (2001). Langzeitwirkungen von Psychoanalysen und Psychotherapien. Eine multiperspektivische, repräsentative Katamnesestudie [Long-term effects of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. A multi-center representative follow-up study]. Psyche, 55, 193-276.
28. Lunnen, K. M., & Ogles, B. M. (1998). A multiperspective, multivariable evaluation of reliable change. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 66, 400-410.
29. Lunnen, K. M., Ogles, B. M., & Pappas, L. N. (2008). A multiperspective comparison of satisfaction, symptomatic change, perceived change, and end-point functioning. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 145-152.
30. Menninger, K. A. (1958). Theory of psychoanalytic technique. New York: Basic Books.
31. Michalak, J., Kosfelder, J., Meyer, F., & Schulte, D. (2003). Messung des Therapieerfolgs. Veränderungsmessung oder retrospektive Erfolgsbeurteilung [Measuring the success of therapy. Change measures or retrospective assessment]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 32, 94-103.
32. Moore, B. E., & Fine, B. D. (1990). Psychoanalytic terms & concepts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33. Nedelmann, C. (1981). Behandlungsziel und Gesundheitsbegriff in der Psychoanalyse [Treatment goals and the concept of health in psychoanalysis]. In H. Bach (Ed.), Der Krankheitsbe griff in der Psychoanalyse [The concept of disease in psychoanalysis] (pp. 55-67). Gottingen, Germany: Vanden hoeck & Ruprecht.
34. OPD Task Force. (Ed.). (2001). Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics. Foundations and manual. Seattle, WA: Hogrefe & Huber.
35. OPD Task Force. (Ed.). (2008). Operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis (OPD-2). Manual of diagnosis and treatment planning. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber.
36. Pekarik, G., & Wolff, C. B. (1996). Relationship of satisfaction to symptom change, follow-up adjustment, and clinical significance. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 202-208.
37. Pfeffer, A. Z. (1959). A procedure for evaluating the results of psychoanalysis: A preliminary report. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 7, 418-444.
38. Rapaport, D. (1960). The structure of psychoanalytic theory: A systemizing attempt (Psychological Issues Series, Vol. II). New York: International Universities Press.
39. Rudolf, G. (1991). Die therapeutische Arbeitsbeziehung [The psychotherapeutic working alliance]. Berlin: Springer.
40. Rudolf, G., Grande, T., Dilg, R., Jakobsen, T., Keller, W., Oberbracht, C., et al. (2002): Structural changes in psychoanalytic therapies-The Heidelberg-Berlin Study on Long-Term Psychoanalytic Therapies (PAL). In M. Leuzinger Bohleber & M. Target (Eds), Longer-term psychoanalytic treatment-Perspectives for therapists and researchers (pp. 201-222). London: Whurr.
41. Rudolf, G., Grande, T., & Oberbracht, C. (2000). Die Heidel- berger Umstrukturierungsskala. Ein Modell der Veränderung in psychoanalytischen Therapien und seine Operationalisierung in einer Schätzskala [The Heidelberg Structural Change Scale. A model for change in psychoanalytic therapies and its operationalization in an assessment scale]. Psychotherapeut, 45, 237-246.
42. Rudolf, G., Laszig, P., & Henningsen, C. (1997). Dokumentation im Dienste von klinischer Forschung und Qualitätssicherung [Documentation as a way of clinical research and quality control]. Psychotherapeut, 42, 145-155.
43. th ed.]. Munich: Urban & Fischer Verlag.
44. Sandler, J., & Sandler, A. (1983). The second censorship, the three box model, and some technical implications. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 413-425.
45. Schauenburg, H., & Strack, M. (1999). Measuring psychotherapeutic change with the Symptom Checklist-90-R-SCL 90 R. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 68, 199-207.
46. Schlesinger, N., & Robbins, F. (1975). The psychoanalytic process: Recurrent patterns of conflicts and changes in ego functions. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 23, 761-782.
47. Schneider, G., Mendler, T. M., Heuft, G., & Burgmer, M. (2008). Validität der Konfliktachse der Operationalisierten Psychodynamischen Diagnostik (OPD-1)-Empirische Ergebnisse und Folgerungen für die OPD-2 [Validity of axis III "conflicts" of Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnostics (OPD-1)-Empirical results and conclusions for OPD-2]. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 54, 46-62.
48. Schneider, G., Schmitz-Moormann, S., Bär, O., Driesch, G., & Heuft, G. (2006). Psychodynamische Therapiefoki in einer stationären multimodalen Therapie-Zusammenhänge zu den Selbstauskunftsskalen und individuellen Therapiezielen [Psy chodynamic therapy foci in inpatient psychotherapy-Relations to self-assessment scales and individual therapeutic goals]. Zeitschrift fur Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 52, 259-273.
49. Schulte, D. (2008). Patients' outcome expectancies and their impression of suitability as predictors of treatment outcome. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 481-494.
50. Stasch, M., Schmal, H., Hillenbrand, E., & Cierpka, M. (2007). Fokusorientierte Interventionen mit der OPD in der stationären Psychotherapie. Effekte auf Ergebnis und Verlauf der Behandlung [Focal interventions based on the OPD in inpatient treatment. Effects on outcome and process]. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, 53, 309-323.
51. Stiles, W. B., Elliot, R., Llewelyn, S. P., Firth-Cozens, J. A., Margison, F. R., Shapiro, D. A., et al. (1990). Assimilation of problematic experiences by clients in psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 27, 411-420.
52. Stiles, W. B., Meshiot, C. M., Anderson, T. M., & Sloan, W. W. (1992). Assimilation of problematic experiences: The case of John Jones. Psychotherapy Research, 2, 81-101.
53. Stiles, W. B., Shapiro, D. A., Harper, H., & Morrison, L. A. (1995). Therapist contributions to psychotherapeutic assimilation: An alternative to the drug metaphor. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 68, 1-13.
54. Thomä, H., & Kächele, H. (1987). Psychoanalytic practice: 1. Principles. Berlin: Springer.
55. Ticho, G. R. (1967). On self-analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 48, 308-318.
56. Wallerstein, R. S. (1965). The goals of psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 13, 748-770.
57. Wallerstein, R. S. (1988). Psychoanalysis and psychotherapy: Relative roles reconsidered. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 16, 129-151.
58. Wallerstein, R. S. (1996). Scales of Psychological Capacities. Version 1. Unpublished manuscript.
59. Wallerstein, R. S. (2001). Die Generationen der Psychotherapieforschung-ein Überblick [Psychoanalytic therapy research: An overview]. In U. Stuhr, M. Leuzinger-Bohleber, & M. Beutel (Eds), Langzeitpsychotherapie. Perspektiven fur Therapeuten und Wissenschaftler [Long-term psychotherapy: Perspectives for therapists and researchers] (pp. 38-60). Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
60. Weinryb, R. M., & Rössel, R. J. (1991). Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile-KAPP. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 83, 1-23.