We want respect: Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities address respect in research

American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 263-274

  McDonald, Katherine Elizabeth ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Inclusion; People with intellectual and developmental disabilities; Research participation; Respect

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; ETHICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH DESIGN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865117198     PISSN: 19447515     EISSN: 19447558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.4.263     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aldridge, J. (2007). Picture this: The use of participatory photographic research methods with people with learning disabilities. Disability & Society, 22, 1-17. (Pubitemid 44878927)
2. Aman, M., & Handen, B. (2006). Reactions to ''Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research'' by Dr. Teresa Iacono. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 31, 180-182. (Pubitemid 44359323)
3. Andre-Barron, D., Strydom, A., & Hassiotis, A. (2008). What to tell and how to tell: A qualitative study of information sharing in research with adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 501-506.
4. Atlasti Scientific Software Development. (2009). Atlas.ti (v.6.0). Software. Berlin, Germany: Author.
5. Becker, H., Roberts, G., Morrison, J., & Silver, J. (2004). Recruiting people with disabilities as research participants: Challenges and strategies to address them. Mental Retardation, 42, 471-475. (Pubitemid 39563549)
6. Boxall, K., & Ralph, S. (2009). Research ethics and the use of visual images in research with people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34, 45-54.
7. Brigham, L. (1998). Representing the lives of women with learning difficulties: Ethical dilemmas in the research process. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 146-150.
8. Brodin, J., & Renblad, K. (2000). Ethical reflections in research on persons with intellectual disabilities. Technology & Disability, 13, 151-159.
9. Cameron, L., & Murphy, J. (2006). Obtaining consent to participate in research: The issues involved in including people with a range of learning and communication disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 113-120.
10. Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 186-190.
11. Clements, J., Rapley, M., & Cummins, R. A. (1999). On, to, for, with -Vulnerable people and the practices of the research community. Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy, 27, 103-115. (Pubitemid 29265505)
12. Dalton, A., & McVilly, K. (2004). Ethics guidelines for international multicenter research involving people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 1, 57-70.
13. Diesfeld, K. (1999). International and ethical safeguards: Genetics and people with learning disabilities. Disability & Society, 14, 21-36.
14. Dillon, R. (2010). Respect. In Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Available at http://plato. stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/respect/
15. Dybwad, G., & Bersani, H. (1996). New voices: Selfadvocacy by people with disabilities. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
16. Dye, L., Hare, D. J., & Hendy, S. (2007). Capacity of people with intellectual disabilities to consent to take part in a research study. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 168-174.
17. Dye, L., Hendy, S., Hare, D. J., & Burton, M. (2004). Capacity to consent to participate in research -A recontextualization. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 144-150. (Pubitemid 39064551)
18. Ellem, K., Wilson, J., Hong Chui, W., & Knox, M. (2008). Ethical challenges of life story research with ex-prisoners with intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 23, 497-509.
19. Ferguson, D. (2004). Learning disability research: A discussion paper. Learning Disability Practice, 7, 17-19. (Pubitemid 38920779)
20. Fisher, C. B. (2003). Goodness-of-fit ethic for informed consent to research involving adults with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9, 27-31. (Pubitemid 36298305)
21. Fisher, C. B., Cea, C. D., Davidson, P. W., & Fried, A. L. (2006). Capacity of persons with mental retardation to consent to participate in randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 1813-1820. (Pubitemid 44522492)
22. Freedman, R. I. (2001). Ethical challenges in the conduct of research involving persons with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 39, 130-141. (Pubitemid 33653132)
23. Gilbert, T. (2004). Involving people with learning disabilities in research: Issues and possibilities. Health & Social Care in the Community, 12, 298-308. (Pubitemid 38882502)
24. Ham, M., Jones, N., Mansell, I., Northway, R., Price, L., & Walker, G. (2004). ''I'm a researcher!'' Working together to gain ethical approval for a participatory research study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8, 397-407. (Pubitemid 40045375)
25. Heller, T., Pederson, E., & Miller, A. (1996). Guidelines from the consumer: Improving consumer involvement in research and training for persons with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 34, 141-148. (Pubitemid 26187616)
26. Iacono, T. (2006). Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 31, 173-179. (Pubitemid 44359322)
27. Iacono, T., & Murray, V. (2003). Issues of informed consent in conducting medical research involving people with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 41-51. (Pubitemid 38422523)
28. Lai, R., Elliott, D., & Ouellette-Kuntz, H. (2006). Attitudes of research ethics committee members towards individuals with intellectual disabilities: The need for more research. Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 3, 114-118.
29. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Malott, R. W. (2002). Notes from a radical behaviorist: Is it morally defensible to use the developmentally disabled as guinea pigs? Behavior & Social Issues, 11, 105-106.
31. McCarthy, M. (1998). Interviewing people with learning disabilities about sensitive topics: A discussion of ethical issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 140-145.
32. McDonald, K., Keys, C., & Henry, D. (2008). The gatekeepers of science: Attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 113, 466-478.
33. McDonald, K., & Kidney, C. (2012). What's right? Ethics in intellectual disability research. Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 9, 27-39.
34. McDonald, K., Kidney, C., Nelms, S., Parker, M., Kimmel, A., & Keys, C. (2009). Including adults with intellectual disabilities in research: Scientists' perceptions of risk and protections. Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 244-252.
35. McVilly, K. R., & Dalton, A. J. (2006). Commentary on Iacono (2006): ''Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research.'' Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 31, 186-188. (Pubitemid 44359325)
36. Miles,M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37. Miller, A., & Keys, C. (1996). Awareness, action, and collaboration: How the self-advocacy movement is empowering for persons with developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation, 34, 312-319. (Pubitemid 26337262)
38. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protections of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
39. Nicolaidis, C., Raymaker, R., McDonald, K., Robertson, S., Dern, S., & Ashkenzy, E. (2011). Collaboration strategies in non-traditional CBPR partnerships: Lessons from a geographically-dispersed partnership with autistic self-advocates. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, & Action, 5, 143-150.
40. Roberts, L., Hammond, K., Warner, & Lewis, R. (2004). Influence of ethical safeguards on research participation: Comparison of perspectives of people with schizophrenia and psychiatrists. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 2309-2311. (Pubitemid 39587299)
41. Rodgers, J. (1999). Trying to get it right: Undertaking research involving people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 14, 421-433.
42. Rolph, S. (1998). Ethical dilemmas in historical research with people with learning difficulties. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 135-139.
43. Stalker, K. (1998). Some ethical and methodological issues in research with people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 13, 5-19. (Pubitemid 128539574)
44. Turnbull, A., & Lakin, C. (2005) National Research Goals for People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
45. Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Gartlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., Whitener, L. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence (Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 99). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
46. Woodring, J., Foley, S., Rado, G., Brown, K., & Hamner, D. (2006). Focus groups and methodological reflections: Conscientious flexibility in the field. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 16, 248-258. (Pubitemid 44599531)