International Ethical Safeguards: Genetics and people with learning disabilities

Disability and Society

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 21-36

  Diesfeld, Kate ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033483592     PISSN: 09687599     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09687599926352     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. BACH, M. (1994) Quality of life: questioning the vantage points for research, in: Disability is not Measles: new research paradigms in disability, pp. 128-151 (Ontario, L'Institut Roeher).
2. BERESFORD, P. & CAMPBELL, J. (1994) Disabled people, service users, user involvement, and representation, Disability and Society, 9, pp. 315-325.
3. BROCK, D. (Sept-Oct 1994) Good decisionmaking for incompetent patients, Hastings Center Report (Special Supp), pp. S8-S11.
4. BROWN, H. & SMITH, H. (1989) Whose life is it anyway? Community care policy, Disability Handicap and Society, 4(2), pp. 105-119.
5. CARSON, D. (1993) Disabling progress: the law commission's proposals on mentally incapacitated adults' decision-making, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 5, p. 305.
6. CHERRY, C. (Oct. 1997) Health care, human worth, and the limits of the particular, Journal of Medical Ethics, 23, pp. 310-314.
7. COUNCIL OF EUROPE (1996) Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with Regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine (Strasbourg, Council of Europe).
8. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (1991) Local Research Ethics Committees, cited in McHale (1993), 161.
9. DRESSER, R. & WHITEHOUSE, P. (1994) The incompetent patient on the slippery slope, Hastings Center Report, 24, No. 4, pp. 6-12.
10. FENNELL, P. (1996) Treatment Without Consent: law, psychiatry and the treatment of mentally disordered (London, Routledge).
11. FETHE, C. (1993) Beyond voluntary consent: Hans Jonas on the moral requirements of human experimentation, Journal of Medical Ethics, 19, pp. 99-103.
12. FULFORD, K.W.M. & HOWSE, K. (1993) Ethics of research with psychiatric patients: principles, problems, and the primary responsibilities of researchers, Journal of Medical Ethics, 19, p. 85.
13. GADD, E. (1998) Changing the law on decision making for mentally incapacitated adults, British Medical Journal, 316, 10 January, p. 90.
14. GILLMAN, M., SWAIN, J. & HEYMAN, B. (1997) Life history or 'case history': the objectification of people with learning difficulties through the tyranny of professional discourses, Disability and Society, 12, pp. 675-693.
15. GLEASON, J. (1994) Theoretical framework for what persons with severe and profound multiple disabilities do in context, Disability is not Measles: new research paradigms in disability, p. 247 (Ontario, L'Institut Roeher).
16. GOODING, C. (1994) Disabling Laws, Enabling Acts: disability rights in Britain and America (London, Pluto).
17. GOODING, C. (1996) Blackstone's Guide to the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (London, Blackstone's Press).
18. INCLUSION INTERNATIONAL (1996) Promoting and Ensuring Human Dignity and Human Rights: response to the I.B.C. preliminary draft of a universal declaration of March 1996 on the Human Genome and Human Rights (Ontario, L'Institut Roeher).
19. JONAS, H. (1972) Philosophical Essays: from ancient creed to technological man (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
20. KASS, N., SUGARMAN, J., FADEN, R. & SCHOCH-SPANA, M. (1996) Trust: the fragile foundation of biomedical research, Hastings Center Report, pp. 25-29.
21. KOENIG, B. (1996) The power (and limits) of proximity, Hastings Center Report, pp. 29-31.
22. LAW COMMISSION REPORT, 'Mental Incapacity' (1995) No. 231 (London, HMSO).
23. L'INSTITUT ROEHER (1994) Just Technology? From Principles to Practice in Bio-Ethical Principles: issue paper of the International League of Societies for Persons with Mental Handicap (Ontario, L'Institut Roeher).
24. LORD CHANCELLOR'S DEPARTMENT (1997) Who Decides? Making decisions on behalf of mentally incapacitated adults, cm3803 (London, HMSO).
25. LORD LLOYD OF HEMPSTEAD & FREEMAN, M.D.A. (1985) Lloyds' Introduction to Jurisprudence, 5th edn (London, Stevens).
26. MCCUBBIN, M. & COHEN, D. (1996) Extremely unbalanced: interest divergence and power disparities between clients and psychiatry, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 19, p. 1.
27. MCGREGOR VENNELL, M. (1995) Medical research and treatment: ethical standards in the international context, Medical Law International, 2, p. 13.
28. MCHALE, J.V. (1993) Guidelines for medical research: some ethical and legal problems, Medical Law Review, 1, Summer, pp. 160-185.
29. MORENO, J. (1993) Who's to choose? Surrogate decision-making in New York State, Hastings Center Reports, pp. 5-11.
30. MORREIM, G.H. (1993) Profoundly diminished life, Hastings Center Report, pp. 33-42.
31. MORRIS, J. (1993) Involving Disabled People in Community Care Planning, Dept of Social Policy and Social Work (Manchester, University of Manchester).
32. New York Times (1998) Fears of research, 22 April 1998, pA24, Col. 1.
33. NUFFIELD COUNCIL (1997) Mental Disorders and Genetics: the ethical context, in scope of study (London, Nuffield Council).
34. OLIVER, M. (1990) The Politics of Disablement (Basingstoke, Macmillan).
35. PHILLIPS, M. (1995) Rage, rage against the dying of our rights, The Observer, 5/11/95, p. 11.
36. RAWLS, J.A. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
37. SMITH, C. (1997) Disabling autonomy: the role of government, the law, and the family, Journal of Law and Society, 24, pp. 421-439.
38. STALKER, K. (1998) Some ethical and methodological issues in research with people with learning difficulties, Disability and Society, 13, pp. 5-19.
39. SUGARMAN, J. (1994) Recognizing good decisionmaking for incapacitated patients, Hastings Center Report, Special Suppl (Nov-Dec), pp. S11-S13.
40. SUTCLIFFE, J. & SIMONS, K. (1993) Self-advocacy and Adults with Learning Difficulties (London, NIACE).
41. TURNBULL, H.R. (1988) Fifteen questions: ethical inquiries in mental retardation, in: J. STARK (Ed.) Mental Retardation and Mental Health: classification, diagnosis, treatment, services (New York, Springer-Verlag).
42. UNION OF PHYSICALLY IMPAIRED AGAINST SEGREGATION (UPIAS) (1970) Fundamental Principles of Disability (London, UPIAS).
43. WARD, A. (1996) Consensus for Change: a report on a major conference to consider the need for a fundamental review of the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984, Plenary Lecture 6 December 1996 (Edinburgh, The Law Society of Scotland).
44. WILKINSON, R.G. (1996) Unhealthy Societies: the afflictions of inequality (London, Routledge).
45. WOLFENSBERGER, W. (1994) The growing threat to the lives of handicapped people in the context of modernistic values, Disability and Society, 9, p. 395.