Commentary on Iacono (2006): "Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research"

Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 186-188

  McVilly, Keith R ^a   Dalton, Arthur J ^b  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b NEW YORK STATE INSTITUTE FOR BASIC RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Informed consent; Intellectual disability; Research ethics

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTELLECTUAL IMPAIRMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS;

EID: 33748479075     PISSN: 13668250     EISSN: 14699532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13668250600876426     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Bach, M., & Rock, M. (1996). Seeking consent to participate in research from people whose ability to make an informed decision could be questioned: The supported decision-making model. Ontario: The Roeher Institute.
2. Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
3. Clements, J., Rapley, M., & Cummins, R. (1999). On, to, for, with - vulnerable people and the practices of the research community. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 27, 103-115.
4. Dalton, A., & McVilly, K. (2004). Ethics guidelines for international, multicenter research involving people with intellectual disabilities (Guidelines commissioned by the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual Disability [IASSID]). Journal of Policy & Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 1, 57-70.
5. Department of Constitutional Affairs (2006). Mental Capacity Act Code of Practice: Consultation paper. London, UK: Author.
6. Dinerstein, R., Herr, S., & O'Sullivan, J. (1999). A guide to consent. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
7. Freedman, R. (2001). Ethical challenges in the conduct of research involving persons with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 39, 130-141.
8. Griffin, T., & Balandin, S. (2004). Ethical research involving people with intellectual disabilities. In E. Emerson, C. Hatton, T. Thompson, & T. R. Parmenter (Eds.), The international handbook of applied research in intellectual disabilities (pp. 61-82). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
9. Iacono, T. (2006). Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 31, 173-179.
10. Lipson, J. (1994). Ethical issues in ethnography. In J. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 333-355). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
11. Pettit, P. (1992). Instituting a research ethic: Chilling and cautionary tales. Bioethics, 6, 89-112.
12. Sturman, E. D. (2005). The capacity to consent to treatment and research: A review of standardized assessment tools. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 954-974.