What Is Right? Ethics in Intellectual Disabilities Research

Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 27-39

  Mcdonald, Katherine E ^a   Kidney, Colleen A ^b  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human research ethics; Inclusion; Institutional review boards; Intellectual disabilities; Research participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858308990     PISSN: 17411122     EISSN: 17411130     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-1130.2011.00319.x     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Aman, M. G., & Handen, B. (2006). Reactions to "Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research" by Dr. Teresa Iacono. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 31, 180-182.
2. Andre-Barron, D., Strydom, A., & Hassiotis, A. (2008). What to tell and how to tell: A qualitative study of information sharing in research with adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 501-506.
3. Arscott, K., Dagnan, D., & Kroese, B. S. (1998). Consent to psychological research by people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 11, 77-83.
4. Atkinson, D. (2004). Research and empowerment: Involving people with learning difficulties in oral and life history research. Disability & Society, 19, 691-702.
5. Becker, H., Roberts, G., Morrison, J., & Silver, J. (2004). Recruiting people with disabilities as research participants: Challenges and strategies to address them. Mental Retardation, 42, 471-475.
6. Beh, H. G. (2002). The role of institutional review boards in protecting human subjects: Are we really ready to fix a broken system? Law & Psychology Review, 26, 1-47.
7. Bentley, J. P., & Thacker, P. G. (2004). The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decision making process. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 293-298.
8. Black, B. S., Brandt, J., Rabins, P. V., Samus, Q. M., Steele, C. D., Lyketsos, C. G., etal. (2008). Predictors of providing informed consent or assent for research participation in assisted living residents. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16, 83-91.
9. Boxall, K., & Ralph, S. (2009). Research ethics and the use of visual images in research with people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34, 45-54.
10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 7-101.
11. Brigham, L. (1998). Representing the lives of women with learning difficulties: Ethical dilemmas in the research process. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 146-150.
12. Brodin, J., & Renblad, K. (2000). Ethical reflections in research on persons with intellectual disabilities. Technology and Disability, 13, 151-159.
13. Brown, H., & Thompson, D. (1997). The ethics of research with men who have learning disabilities and abusive sexual behaviour: A minefield in a vacuum. Disability & Society, 12, 695-707.
14. Cambridge, P., & Forester-Jones, R. (2003). Using individualized communication for interviewing people with intellectual disability: A case study of user-centred research. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 28, 5-23.
15. Cameron, L., & Murphy, J. (2006). Obtaining consent to participate in research: The issues involved in including people with a range of learning and communication disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 113-120.
16. Charlton, J. (1998). Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
17. Clegg, J. (1999). Ethics and intellectual disability. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 12, 537-541.
18. Clegg, J. (2004). Practice in focus: A hermeneutic approach to research ethics. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 186-190.
19. Coleman, C., Menikoff, J., Goldner, J., & Dubler, N. (2005). The ethics and regulations of research with human subjects. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
20. Dalton, A. J., & McVilly, K. R. (2004). Ethics guidelines for international multicenter research involving people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 1, 57-70.
21. Diesfeld, K. (1999). International and ethical safeguards: Genetics and people with learning disabilities. Disability & Society, 14, 21-36.
22. Dybwad, G., & Bersani, H. (1996). New voices: Self-advocacy by people with disabilities. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
23. Dye, L., Hare, D. J., & Hendy, S. (2007). Capacity of people with intellectual disabilities to consent to take part in a research study. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 20, 168-174.
24. Dye, L., Hendy, S., Hare, D. J., & Burton, M. (2004). Capacity to consent to participate in research-A recontextualization. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 144-150.
25. Ellem, K., Wilson, J., Chui, W., & Knox, M. (2008). Ethical challenges of life story research with ex-prisoners with intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 23, 497-509.
26. Ellis, J. (1992). Decisions by and for people with mental retardation: Balancing considerations of autonomy and protection. Villanova Law Review, 37, 1779-1809.
27. Fisher, C. B. (2002). Respecting and protecting mentally impaired persons in medical research. Ethics & Behavior, 12, 280-283.
28. Fisher, C. B. (2003). Goodness-of-fit ethic for informed consent to research involving adults with mental retardation and developmental disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 9, 27-31.
29. Fisher, C. B., Cea, C. D., Davidson, P. W., & Fried, A. L. (2006). Capacity of persons with mental retardation to consent to participate in randomized clinical trials. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 1813-1820.
30. Foster-Fishman, P., & Keys, C. (1997). The person/environment dynamics of employee empowerment: An organizational culture analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 345-369.
31. Freedman, R. I. (2001). Ethical challenges in the conduct of research involving persons with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 39, 130-141.
32. Gates, B., & Waight, M. (2007). Reflections on conducting focus groups with people with learning disabilities: Theoretical and practical issues. Journal of Research in Nursing, 12, 111-126.
33. Gilbert, T. (2004). Involving people with learning disabilities in research: Issues and possibilities. Health & Social Care in the Community, 12, 298-308.
34. Ham, M., Jones, N., Mansell, I., Northway, R., Price, L., & Walker, G. (2004). "I'm a researcher!" Working together to gain ethical approval for a participatory research study. Journal of Leading Disabilities, 8, 397-407.
35. Huntington, I., & Robinson, W. (2007). The many ways of saying yes and no: Reflections on the research coordinator's role in recruiting research participants and obtaining informed consent. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 29, 6-10.
36. Iacono, T. (2006a). Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 31, 173-179.
37. Iacono, T. (2006b). Further comments on the researched, researchers and ethics committees: A response. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 31, 189-191.
38. Iacono, T., & Murray, V. (2003). Issues of informed consent in conducting medical research involving people with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 41-51.
39. Kim, S. (2006). When does decisional impairment become decisional incompetence? Ethical and methodological issues in capacity research in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, 92-97.
40. Kim, S. Y. H., Cox, C., & Caine, E. D. (2002). Impaired decision-making ability in subjects with Alzheimer's disease and willingness to participate in research. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 797-802.
41. Kim, S., Kim, H. M., Langa, K. M., Karlawish, J. H., Knopman, D. S., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2009). Surrogate consent for dementia research: A national survey of older Americans. Neurology, 72, 149-155.
42. Krahn, G., Hammond, L., & Turner, A. (2006). A cascade of disparities: Health and health care access for people with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 12, 70-82.
43. Lai, R., Elliott, D., & Ouellette-Kuntz, H. (2006). Attitudes of research ethics committee members towards individuals with intellectual disabilities: The need for more research. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 3, 114-118.
44. Lakin, K., & Turnbull, A. (2005). National goals and research for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
45. Malott, R. W. (2002). Notes from a radical behaviorist: Is it morally defensible to use the developmentally disabled as guinea pigs? Behavior and Social Issues, 11, 105-106.
46. McCarthy, M. (1998). Interviewing people with learning disabilities about sensitive topics: A discussion of ethical issues. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 140-145.
47. McDonald, K., & Keys, C. (2008). How the powerful decide: Access to research participation for those at the margins. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 79-93.
48. McDonald, K., Keys, C., & Henry, D. (2008). The gatekeepers of science: Attitudes toward the research participation of adults with intellectual disability. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 113, 466-478.
49. McDonald, K., Kidney, C., Nelms, S., Parker, M., Kimmel, A., & Keys, C. (2009). Including adults with intellectual disabilities in research: Scientists' perceptions of risk and protections. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 244-252.
50. McVilly, K. R., & Dalton, A. J. (2006). Commentary on Iacono (2006): "Ethical challenges and complexities of including people with intellectual disability as participants in research." Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 31, 186-188.
51. Morris, C., Niederbuhl, J., & Mahr, J. (1993). Determining the capability of individuals with mental retardation to give informed consent. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 263-272.
52. National Institute of Health. (2009). Research involving individuals with questionable capacity to consent: Points to consider. Retrieved November 12, 2009, from
53. Nicolaidis, C., Raymaker, R., McDonald, K., Robertson, S., Dern, S., & Ashkenzy, E. (2011). Collaboration strategies in non-traditional CBPR partnerships: Lessons from a geographically-dispersed partnership with autistic self-advocates. Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, 5, 143-150.
54. Oakes, J. M. (2002). Risks and wrongs in social science research. Evaluation Review, 26, 443-479.
55. Ramcharan, P. (2006). Ethical challenges and complexities of including vulnerable people in research: Some pre-theoretical considerations. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 31, 183-185.
56. Roberts, L., & Roberts, B. (1999). Psychiatric research ethics: An overview of evolving guidelines and current ethical dilemmas in the study of mental illness. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 1025-1038.
57. Roberts, L., Hammond, K., & Hoop, J. (2006). An inverse relationship between perceived harm and participation willingness in schizophrenia research protocols. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 2002-2004.
58. Roberts, L., Hammond, K., Warner, T. D., & Lewis, R. (2004). Influence of ethical safeguards on research participation: Comparison of perspectives of people with schizophrenia and psychiatrists. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 2309-2311.
59. Roberts, L., Warner, T., Brody, J., Roberts, B., Lauriello, J., & Lyketsos, C. (2002). Patient and psychiatrists ratings of hypothetical schizophrenia research protocols: Assessment of harm potential and factors influencing participation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 573-584.
60. Roberts, L. W., Warner, D., & Brody, J. L. (2000). Perspectives of patients with schizophrenia and psychiatrists regarding ethically important aspects of research participation. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 67-74.
61. Rodgers, J. (1999). Trying to get it right: Undertaking research involving people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 14, 421-433.
62. Rolph, S. (1998). Ethical dilemmas in historical research with people with learning difficulties. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 135-139.
63. Sachs, G. (1994). Ethical aspects of dementia research: Informed consent and proxy consent. Clinical Research, 42, 403-412.
64. Stalker, K. (1998). Some ethical and methodological issues in research with people with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 13, 5-19.
65. Stineman, M. G., & Musick, D. W. (2001). Protection of human subjects with disability: Guidelines for research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, S9-S14.
66. Walker, M. U. (2002). Autonomy, beneficence, and justice in wider context. Ethics & Behavior, 12, 291-293.
67. Warren, J. W., Sobal, J., Tenney, J. H., Hoopes, J. M., Damron, D., Levenson, S., etal. (1986). Informed consent by proxy. An issue in research with elderly patients. New England Journal of Medicine, 315, 1124-1128.
68. Whyte, W. (1990). Participatory action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69. Widom, C., & Czaja, S. (2005). Reactions to research participation in vulnerable subgroups. Accountability in Research, 12, 115-138.
70. Yan, E., & Munir, K. (2004). Regulatory and ethical principles in research involving children and individuals with developmental disabilities. Ethics & Behavior, 14, 31-49.